Cover not available

Article published In: Discourse-pragmatic markers, fillers and filled pauses: Pragmatic, cognitive, multimodal and sociolinguistic perspectives
Edited by Kate Beeching, Grant Howie, Minna Kirjavainen and Anna Piasecki
[Pragmatics & Cognition 29:2] 2022
► pp. 297–323

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Between placeholder and filler

Degrees of prosodic prominence of French machin and truc

 | Universität Tübingen
 | Universität Tübingen
Published online: 11 April 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.22003.hen
Abstract
French truc and machin (‘thing’) can function as placeholders, fillers or in general extender constructions. The aim of our paper is to investigate whether the prosodic characteristics of these three different uses may give a clue as to their respective status. For our analysis, we extracted 112 occurrences of truc and 57 occurrences of machin from the audio data of the PFC Corpus, which were analysed using Praat, focusing on the acoustic duration, the individual pitch contour and the integration of machin and truc into the intonation contour of the utterance. As in previous studies, our results show that the prosodic patterns vary remarkably and show a highly heterogeneous picture so that the use of prosodic properties as cues for disambiguation is problematic. However, we are able to show some weak tendencies which point to a close functional link between placeholders and fillers reflecting their pragmatic functions. There is no evidence for prosodic weakening or even phonetic reduction in placeholders. Furthermore, we detect some evidence for the detachment typical of pragmatic markers in the case of fillers. The prosodic characteristics of truc and machin in general extender constructions diverge from both the placeholder and the filler functions. Their prosody seems to be largely determined by the particular respective construction into which both forms are strongly integrated.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Fillers and placeholders: An overview
  • 3.French truc and machin
  • 4.The prosodic properties of truc and machin
    • 4.1Method
    • 4.2The prosodic analysis of truc
    • 4.3The prosodic analysis of machin
  • 5.Discussion
    • Acoustic durations
    • Intonation contours
    • Prosodic integration/detachment
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (40)
References
Anscombre, Jean-Claude. 1979. Délocutivité benvenistéenne, délocutivité généralisée et performativité. Langue française 421. 69–84. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bartkova, Katarina, Alice Bastien & Mathilde Dargnat. 2016. How to be a discourse particle? In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2016, 859–863. Boston: Boston University. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beeching, Kate, Ludivine Crible & Minna Kirjavainen. 2022. Can filled pauses be represented as linguistic items? Investigating the effect of exposure on the perception and production of um. Language and Speech 65(2). 263–289. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Béguelin, Marie-José & Gilles Corminboeuf. 2017. Ou comme ça, machin et autres marqueurs d’indétermination dans les listes. Discours 201. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile. 1966. Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bertrand, Roxane & Catherine Chanet. 2005. Fonctions pragmatiques et prosodie de enfin en français spontané. Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique 171. 41–68.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2021. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. Computer program, version 6.1.50. [URL]
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 1986. An introduction to English prosody. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delais-Roussarie, Elisabeth, Brechtje Post, Mathieu Avanzi, Carolin Buthke, Albert Di Cristo, Ingo Feldhausen, Sun-Ah Jun, Philippe Martin, Trudel Meisenburg, Annie Rialland, Rafèu Sichel-Bazin & Hi-Yon Yoo. 2015. Intonational phonology of French: Developing a ToBI system for French. In Sónia Frota & Pilar Prieto (eds.), Intonation in Romance, 63–100. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dictionnaire historique de la langue française (DHLF). 1998. Paris: Le Robert.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dubois, Sylvie. 1992. Extension particles, etc. Language Variation and Change 41. 179–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ducard, Dominique. 2017. L’histoire d’un truc. Linx: Revue des linguistes de l’Université Paris Nanterre 741. 17–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Durand, Jacques, Bernard Laks & Chantal Lyche. 2002. La phonologie du français contemporain: Usages, variétés et structure. In Claus Pusch & Wolfgang Raible (eds.), Romanistische Korpuslinguistik : Korpora und gesprochene Sprache [Romance corpus linguistics: Corpora and spoken language], 93–106. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph E. 1985. A unified theory of syntactic categories. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eychenne, Julien. 2018. Dolmen: A program for the analysis of speech corpora. Computer program, version 2.0.0. [URL]. [retrieved 4 May 2018]
Fox, Barbara. 2010. Introduction. In Nino Amiridze, Boyd H. Davis & Margaret Maclagan (eds.), Fillers, pauses and placeholders, 1–10. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldman, Jean-Philippe. 2011. EasyAlign: An automatic phonetic alignment tool under Praat. Paper presented at the 12th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association. 27–31 August, Florence, Italy.
Hayashi, Makoto & Kyung-eun Yoon. 2010. A cross-linguistic exploration of demonstratives in interaction: With particular reference to the context of word-formulation trouble. In Nino Amiridze, Boyd Davis & Margaret Maclagan (eds.), Fillers, pauses and placeholders, 33–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hennecke, Inga & Wiltrud Mihatsch (2022). From taxonomic to pragmatic uses of French genre: Degrees of prosodic prominence as indicators of pragmaticalization. In Hélène Vassiliadou & Marie Lammert (eds.), Clear versus approximate categorisation: A crosslinguistic perspective, 299–338. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnsen, Laure Anne & Mathieu Avanzi. 2020. Étude des contours prosodiques des listes ouvertes dans le corpus OFROM. Studia Linguistica Romanica 41. 110–128.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jun, Sun-Ah & Cécile Fougeron. 2000. A phonological model of French intonation. In Antonis Botinis (ed.), Intonation: Analysis, modeling and technology, 209–242. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kleiber, Georges. 1994. Nominales: Essais de sémantique référentielle. Paris: Colin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koch, Peter. 1993. Kyenbé-tyonbo: Wurzeln kreolischer Lexik. In Thomas Kotschi & Christian Foltys (eds.), Berliner romanistische Studien. Für Horst Ochse, 259–287. Berlin: Institut für Romanische Philologie der FU.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Koch, Peter & Oesterreicher, Wulf. 1990. Gesprochene Sprache in der Romania: Französisch, Italienisch, Spanisch. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lee, Lou, Katarina Bartkova, Mathilde Dargnat & Denis Jouvet. 2018. Prosodic and pragmatic values of discourse particles in French. In ExLing 2018: Proceedings of the 9th Tutorial and Research Workshop on Experimental Linguistics, 77–80. Athens: ExLing Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mihatsch, Wiltrud. 2006a. Kognitive Grundlagen lexikalischer Hierarchien untersucht am Beispiel des Französischen und Spanischen. Tübingen: Niemeyer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006b. Machin, truc, chose: La naissance de marqueurs pragmatiques. In Martina Drescher & Barbara Job (eds.), Les marqueurs discursifs dans les langues romanes: Approches théoriques et méthodologiques, 153–172. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. ‘Wird man von Hustensaft wie so ne art bekifft?’ Approximationsmarker in romanischen Sprachen. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Overstreet, Maryann. 1999. Whales, candlelight, and stuff like that: General extenders in English discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. And stuff und so: Investigating pragmatic expressions in English and German. Journal of Pragmatics 37(11). 1845–1864. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pekarek Doehler, Simona. 2016. More than an epistemic hedge: French je sais pas ‘I don’t know’ as a resource for the sequential organization of turns and actions. Journal of Pragmatics 1061. 148–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plag, Ingo, Julia Homann & Gero Kunter. 2017. Homophony and morphology: The acoustics of word-final S in English. Journal of Linguistics 53(1). 81–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Podlesskaya, Vera. 2010. Parameters for typological variation of placeholders. In Nini Amiridze, Boyd H. Davis & Margaret Maclagan (eds.), Fillers, pauses and placeholders, 11–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pustka, Elissa. 2011. Einführung in die Phonetik und Phonologie des Französischen. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Secova, Maria. 2014. “Je sais et tout mais…”: Might the general extenders in European French be changing? Journal of French Language Studies 24(2). 281–304. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selting, Margret. 2007. Lists as embedded structures and the prosody of list construction as an interactional resource. Journal of Pragmatics 391. 483–526. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Waltereit, Richard. 2006. Abtönung. Zur Pragmatik und historischen Semantik von Modalpartikeln und ihren funktionalen Äquivalenten in romanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Niemeyer (Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Welby, Pauline. 2003. The slaying of Lady Mondegreen, being a study of French tonal association and alignment and their role in speech segmentation. Ohio: Ohio State University PhD dissertation.
Wichmann, Anne. 2011. Grammaticalization and prosody. In Heiko Narrog & Bernd Heine (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization, 331–341. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Seraku, Tohru
2025. Placeholders and interjective hesitators. Studies in Language 49:2 ► pp. 376 ff. DOI logo
Seraku, Tohru
2025. Placeholders in written language: The case of Japanese kō and otsu. Lingua 325 ► pp. 104008 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue