Cover not available

Article published In: Diagrammatic Reasoning
Edited by Riccardo Fusaroli and Kristian Tylén
[Pragmatics & Cognition 22:2] 2014
► pp. 264–283

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Diagrammatic reasoning

Abstraction, interaction, and insight

 | aCenter for Semiotics, School of Communication and Culture, Aarhus University, Denmark
 | bThe Interacting Minds Centre, Aarhus University, Denmark
 | cInstitute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, University of Warszawa, Poland
 | dHumanomics Center, Department of Arts and Cultural Studies, University of Copenhagen
Published online: 11 December 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.22.2.06tyl
Many types of everyday and specialized reasoning depend on diagrams: we use maps to find our way, we draw graphs and sketches to communicate concepts and prove geometrical theorems, and we manipulate diagrams to explore new creative solutions to problems. The active involvement and manipulation of representational artifacts for purposes of thinking and communicating is discussed in relation to C.S. Peirce’s notion of diagrammatical reasoning. We propose to extend Peirce’s original ideas and sketch a conceptual framework that delineates different kinds of diagram manipulation: Sometimes diagrams are manipulated in order to profile known information in an optimal fashion. At other times diagrams are explored in order to gain new insights, solve problems or discover hidden meaning potentials. The latter cases often entail manipulations that either generate additional information or extract information by means of abstraction. Ideas are substantiated by reference to ethnographic, experimental and historical examples.
References (57)
Alibali, M.W., Spencer, R.C., Knox, L., & Kita, S. (2011). Spontaneous gestures influence strategy choices in problem solving. Psychol Sci, 22(9), 1138–1144. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Atã, P., Bitarello, B., & Queiroz, J. (2014). Iconic semiosis and representational efficiency in the London Underground Diagram. Cognitive Semiotics, 7(2), 177–190. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bechtel, W., & Abrahamsen, A. (2012). Diagramming phenomena for mechanistic explanation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bjørndahl, J., Fusaroli, R., Østergaard, S., & Tylén, K. (2014). Thinking together with material representations: Joint epistemic actions in creative problem solving. Cognitive Semiotics, 7(1), 103–123.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2015). When agreeing is not enough. Interaction Studies, 16(3).
Bjørndahl, J.S., Fusaroli, R., Østergaard, S., & Tylén, K. (2014). Thinking together with material representations: Joint epistemic actions in creative problem solving. Cognitive Semiotics, 7(1), 103–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boysen, S.T., Bernston, G.G., Hannan, M.B., & Cacioppo, J.T. (1996). Quantity-based interference and symbolic representations in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of experimental psychology . Animal behavior processes, 22(1), 76–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burnston, D., Sheredos, B., Abrahamsen, A., & Bechtel, W. (2015). Scientists’ Use of Diagrams in Developing Mechanistic Explanations, Pragmatics and Cognition. Pragmatics and Cognition., 22(2), 224–242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cairo, A. (2012). The Functional Art: An introduction to information graphics and visualization. New Riders.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, A. (2006a). Language, embodiment, and the cognitive niche. Trends Cogn Sci, 10(8), 370–374. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2006b). Material symbols. Philosophical psychology, 19(3), 291–307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58(1), 7–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, H.H., & Krych, M.A. (2004). Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding. 62–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cowley, S.J., & Vallée-Tourangeau, F. d. r. (Eds.). (2014). Cognition Beyond the Brain: Computation, Interactivity and Human Artifice (Vol. 171). Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dale, R., Fusaroli, R., Duran, N., & Richardson, D.C. (2013). The self-organization of human interaction. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 591, 43–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dixon, J.A., Stephen, D.G., Boncoddo, R., & Anastas, J. (2010). The self-organization of cognitive structure. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 521, 343–384. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duncker, K. (1945). The Structure and Dynamics of Problem-Solving Processes. Psychological Monographs, 58(5), 1–112. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fay, N., Garrod, S., Roberts, L., & Swoboda, N. (2010). The interactive evolution of human communication systems. Cogn Sci, 34(3), 351–386. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fusaroli, R., Bahrami, B., Olsen, K., Rees, G., Frith, C.D., Roepstorff, A., & Tylén, K. (2012). Coming to terms: an experimental quantification of the coordinative benefits of linguistic interaction. Psychological Science, 231, 931–939. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fusaroli, R., Gangopadhyay, N., & Tylén, K. (2014). The dialogically extended mind: Making a case for language as skilful intersubjective engagement. Cognitive Systems Research, 29-301, 31–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fusaroli, R., Raczaszek-Leonardi, J., & Tylén, K. (2014). Dialog as interpersonal synergy. New Ideas in Psychology, 321, 147–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fusaroli, R., & Tylén, K. (2012). Carving Language for Social Coordination: a dynamic approach. Interaction Studies, 131, 103–123. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (in press). Investigating conversational dynamics: Interactive alignment, Interpersonal synergy, and collective task performance. Cognitive Science.
Garrod, S., & Doherty, G. (1994). Conversation, co-ordination and convention: An empirical investigation of how groups establish linguistic conventions. Cognition, 53(3), 181–215. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garrod, S., Fay, N., Lee, J., Oberlander, J., & MacLeod, T. (2007). Foundations of Representation: Where Might Graphical Symbol Systems Come From? Cognitive Science, 31(6), 961–987. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grant, E.R., & Spivey, M.J. (2003). Eye movements and problem solving guiding attention guides thought. Psychological Science, 14(5), 462–466. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Healey, P.G., Swoboda, N., Umata, I., & King, J. (2007). Graphical language games: Interactional constraints on representational form. Cognitive Science, 31(2), 285–309.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hintikka, J. (1983). The game of language: Studies in game-theoretical semantics and its applications. Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2007). Socratic Epistemology: Explorations of Knowledge-Seeking by Questioning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2005). Material anchors for conceptual blends. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(10), 1555–1577. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2010). Cognitive Ecology. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(4), 705–715. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1995). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. MIT press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kirsh, D., & Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic action. Cognitive Science, 18(4), 513–549. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., Haider, H., & Rhenius, D. (1999). Constraint relaxation and chunk decomposition in insight problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(6), 1534. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Köhler, W. (1925). Komplextheorie und Gestalttheorie. Psychological Research, 6(1), 358–416. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maglio, P.P., Matlock, T., Raphaely, D., Chernicky, B., & Kirsh, D. (1999). Interactive skill in scrabble. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Twenty First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ohlsson, S. (1992). Information-processing explanations of insight and related phenomena. Advances in the psychology of thinking, chap. 11, 1–44.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peirce, C.S. (1931). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce: Vols. 1-6 (C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss, eds.). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1976). The New Elements of Mathematics by C.S. Peirce, edited by Carolyn Eisele. Walter De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1981). Writings of Charles S. Peirce : a chronological edition. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (1998). Charles S. Peirce : the essential writings. Amherst, N.Y.: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwartz, D.L. (1995). The emergence of abstract representations in dyad problem solving. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(3), 321–354. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sheredos, B., Burnston, D., Abrahamsen, A., & Bechtel, W. (2013). Why do biologists use so many diagrams? Philosophy of Science, 80(5), 931–944. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shin, S.-J. (2010). Peirce’s two ways of abstraction. In M. Moore (Ed.), New Essays on Peirce’s Mathematical Philosophy. Chicago and La Salle: Open Court.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stjernfelt, F. (2000). Diagrams as centerpiece of a Peircean epistemology. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, XXXVI(3), 357–392.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2007). Diagrammatology: An investigation on the borderlines of phenomenology, ontology, and semiotics. New York: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2014). Natural Propositions: The Actuality of Peirce’s Doctrine of Dicisigns. Docent Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tek, S., Mesite, L., Fein, D., & Naigles, L. (2014). Longitudinal analyses of expressive language development reveal two distinct language profiles among young children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 44(1), 75–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tylén, K., Fusaroli, R., Bundgaard, P., & Østergaard, S. (2013). Making sense together: A dynamical account of linguistic meaning making. Semiotica, 1941, 39–62.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (2013). Interactivity, efficiency, and individual differences in mental arithmetic. Experimental psychology, 60(4), 302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weller, A., Villejoubert, G., & Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (2011). Interactive insight problem solving. Thinking & Reasoning, 17(4), 424–439. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yau, N. (2011). Visualize this: the FlowingData guide to design, visualization, and statistics. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (19)

Cited by 19 other publications

Pagnotta, Murillo, Mateusz Psujek, Larissa M. Straffon, Riccardo Fusaroli & Kristian Tylén
2025. Drawing Animals in the Paleolithic: The Effect of Perspective and Abbreviation on Animal Recognition and Aesthetic Appreciation. Topics in Cognitive Science DOI logo
Tong, Jingrong
2025. Diagrammatic thinking and audience reading of COVID-19 data visualisations: A UK case study. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 31:4 ► pp. 1486 ff. DOI logo
Brieven, Géraldine, Lev Malcev & Benoit Donnet
2024. 2024 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Cerutti, Michele
2023. Diagrams as centerpiece for an enactivist epistemology. Semiotika 18 ► pp. 118 ff. DOI logo
Kerr, Clive
2023. Visualizing Portfolios: Prompt Discussions and Provoke Debates in Management Meetings. IEEE Engineering Management Review 51:4 ► pp. 124 ff. DOI logo
MADSEN, ANDERS KOED, ANDERS KRISTIAN MUNK & JOHAN IRVING SØLTOFT
2023. Friction by Machine: How to Slow Down Reasoning with Computational Methods. Ethnographic Praxis in Industry Conference Proceedings 2023:1 ► pp. 65 ff. DOI logo
Perissinotto, Henrique T. D. & João Queiroz
2023. Metacognition and diagrams in marking-for-self. Cognitive Semiotics 16:2 ► pp. 145 ff. DOI logo
Tylén, Kristian, Riccardo Fusaroli, Sara Møller Østergaard, Pernille Smith & Jakob Arnoldi
2023. The Social Route to Abstraction: Interaction and Diversity Enhance Performance and Transfer in a Rule‐Based Categorization Task. Cognitive Science 47:9 DOI logo
Fabry, Regina E. & Markus Pantsar
2021. A fresh look at research strategies in computational cognitive science: The case of enculturated mathematical problem solving. Synthese 198:4 ► pp. 3221 ff. DOI logo
Marshall, Guy Clarke & André Freitas
2021. Measuring diagram quality through semiotic morphisms. Semiotica 2021:239 ► pp. 125 ff. DOI logo
Marshall, Guy Clarke, Caroline Jay & André Freitas
2021. Structuralist Analysis for Neural Network System Diagrams. In Diagrammatic Representation and Inference [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12909], ► pp. 480 ff. DOI logo
Omoge, Michael
2021. Naturalised modal epistemology and quasi-realism. South African Journal of Philosophy 40:3 ► pp. 229 ff. DOI logo
Tylén, Kristian, Riccardo Fusaroli, Sergio Rojo, Katrin Heimann, Nicolas Fay, Niels N. Johannsen, Felix Riede & Marlize Lombard
2020. The evolution of early symbolic behavior inHomo sapiens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117:9 ► pp. 4578 ff. DOI logo
Hohol, Mateusz & Marcin Miłkowski
2019. Cognitive Artifacts for Geometric Reasoning. Foundations of Science 24:4 ► pp. 657 ff. DOI logo
Philipsen, Johanne S. & Sarah Bro Trasmundi
2019. Gesture reuse as distributed embodied cognition. Gesture 18:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Reid, Heleen A. J., Clare Hocking & Liz Smythe
2019. The making of occupation-based models and diagrams: History and semiotic analysis. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy 86:4 ► pp. 313 ff. DOI logo
Fontainha, Tharcisio Cotta, Adriana Leiras, Renata Albergaria de Mello Bandeira & Luiz Felipe Scavarda
2017. Public-Private-People Relationship Stakeholder Model for disaster and humanitarian operations. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 22 ► pp. 371 ff. DOI logo
Christensen, Peer, Riccardo Fusaroli & Kristian Tylén
2016. Environmental constraints shaping constituent order in emerging communication systems: Structural iconicity, interactive alignment and conventionalization. Cognition 146 ► pp. 67 ff. DOI logo
Stege Bjørndahl, Johanne, Riccardo Fusaroli, Svend østergaard & Kristian Tylén
2015. Agreeing is not enough. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 16:3 ► pp. 495 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue