Article published In: Diagrammatic Reasoning
Edited by Riccardo Fusaroli and Kristian Tylén
[Pragmatics & Cognition 22:2] 2014
► pp. 244–263
Iconicity
From sign to system in human communication and language
Nicolas Fay | School of Psychology, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley WA 6009
Published online: 11 December 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.22.2.05fay
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.22.2.05fay
This paper explores the role of iconicity in spoken language and other human communication systems. First, we concentrate on graphical and gestural communication and show how semantically motivated iconic signs play an important role in creating such communication systems from scratch. We then consider how iconic signs tend to become simplified and symbolic as the communication system matures and argue that this process is driven by repeated interactive use of the signs. We then consider evidence for iconicity at the level of the system in graphical communication and finally draw comparisons between iconicity in graphical and gestural communication systems and in spoken language.
Keywords: symbols, signs, icons, language origin, communication, language
References (64)
Armstrong, D.F., & Wilcox, S. (2007). The gestural origin of language. Oxford University Press, USA.
Boye, K., & Harder, P. (2012). A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language, 88(1), 1–44.
Bromberg, I. (2007). Systematicity in the Arabic Mental Lexicon. Perspectives on Arabic Linguistics XIX (Vol. 2891, pp. 3–18).
Caldwell, C.A., & Smith, K. (2012). Cultural Evolution and Perpetuation of Arbitrary Communicative Conventions in Experimental Microsocieties. PLoS ONE, 7(8), e43807.
Christiansen, M.H., & Chater, N. (2008). Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(05), 489–509.
Christensen, P., Fusaroli, R, & Tylén, K. (2016). Environmental constraints shaping constituent order in emerging communication systems: Structural iconicity, interactive alignment and conventionalization. Cognition, 1461, 67–80. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.004.
Ellison, T.M. (2001). Induction and Inherent Similarity. In M. Ramscar & U. Hahn (Eds.), Similarity and Categorization (pp. 29–50). Oxford University Press.
Ellison, T.M., Fay, N., & Garrod, S. (in preparation). From Signs to Structure: The Immediate Emergence of Systematicity in an Interactive Communication Game.
Fay, N., Arbib, M., & Garrod, S. (2013). How to Bootstrap a Human Communication System. Cognitive Science, 37(7), 1356–1367.
Fay, N., & Ellison, T.M. (2013). The Cultural Evolution of Human Communication Systems in Different Sized Populations: Usability Trumps Learnability. PLoS ONE, 8(8), e71781.
Fay, N., Garrod, S., & Roberts, L. (2008). The fitness and functionality of culturally evolved communication systems. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 363(1509), 3553–3561.
Fay, N., Garrod, S., Roberts, L., & Swoboda, N. (2010). The interactive evolution of human communication systems. Cognitive Science, 34(3), 351–386.
Fay, N., Lister, C.J., Ellison, T.M., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2014). Creating a Communication System from Scratch: Gesture Beats Vocalization Hands Down. Frontiers in Psychology, 51: 354.
Frishberg, N. (1975). Arbitrariness and iconicity: Historical change in American Sign Language. Language, 511, 696–719.
Galantucci, B. (2005). An experimental study of the emergence of human communication systems. Cognitive Science, 29(5), 737–767.
Galantucci, B., & Garrod, S. (2011). Experimental Semiotics: A Review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5(11), 1–15.
Galantucci, B., Kroos, C., & Rhodes, T. (2010). The effects of rapidity of fading on communication systems. Interaction Studies, 11(1), 100–111.
Garrod, S., Fay, N., Lee, J., Oberlander, J., & MacLeod, T. (2007). Foundations of Representation: Where Might Graphical Symbol Systems Come From? Cognitive Science, 31(6), 961–987.
Garrod, S., Fay, N., Rogers, S., Walker, B., & Swoboda, N. (2010). Can iterated learning explain the emergence of graphical symbols? Interaction Studies, 11(1), 33–50.
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). The resilience of language: What gesture creation in deaf children can tell us about how children learn language. New York: Psychology Press.
Goldin-Meadow, S., Butcher, C., Mylander, C., & Dodge, M. (1994). Nouns and Verbs in A Self-Styled Gesture System: What′ s in A Name? Cognitive Psychology, 27(3), 259–319.
Hauser, M., Yang, C., Berwick, R., Tattersall, I., Ryan, M., Watumull, J.,. . . Lewontin, R. (2014). The mystery of language evolution. Frontiers in Psychology, 51, 401.
Heine, B., Claudi, U., & Hünnemeyer, F. (1991). Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework (Vol. 1571): University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Hockett, C.F. (1960). Logical considerations in the study of animal communication. In W. Lanyon & W. Tavolga (Eds.), Animal sounds and communication (pp. 392–430). Washington: American Institute of Biological Sciences.
Hupet, M., & Chantraine, Y. (1992). Changes in repeated references: Collaboration or repetition effects? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 211, 485–496.
Kantartzis, K., Imai, M., & Kita, S. (2011). Japanese Sound-Symbolism Facilitates Word Learning in English-Speaking Children. Cognitive Science, 35(3), 575–586.
Kegl, J., Senghas, A., & Coppola, M. (1999). Creation through Contact: Sign Language Emergence and Sign Language Change in Nicaragua. In M. DeGraff (Ed.), Language Creation and Language Change: Creolization, Diachrony and Development (pp. 179–237). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kirby, S., Cornish, H., & Smith, K. (2008). Cumulative cultural evolution in the laboratory: An experimental approach to the origins of structure in human language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(31), 10681–10686.
Krauss, R.M., & Weinheimer, S. (1964). Changes in the length of reference phrases as a function of social interaction: A preliminary study. Psychonomic Science, 11, 113–114.
. (1966). Concurrent feedback, confirmation and the encoding of referents in verbal communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 343–346.
Monaghan, P., Christiansen, M.H., & Fitneva, S.A. (2011). The arbitrariness of the sign: Learning advantages from the structure of the vocabulary. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(3), 325.
Morford, J.P. (1996). Insights to language from the study of gesture: A review of research on the gestural communication of non-signing deaf people. Language and Communication, 16(2), 165–178.
Peirce, C.S. (1931-1958). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vol. 1-81). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Perlman, M., Dale, R., & Lupyan, G. (2015). Iconicity can ground the creation of vocal symbols. Royal Society Open Science, 2(8).
. (2014). Iterative vocal charades: the emergence of conventions in vocal communication. In E.A. Cartmill, S. Roberts, H. Lyn & H. Cornish (Eds.),
The Evolution of Language: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference (EVOLANG10
). New Jersey: World Scientific.
Perniss, P., Thompson, R., & Vigliocco, G. (2010). Iconicity as a general property of language: evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, Article 2771, 1–15.
Piantadosi, S.T., Tily, H., & Gibson, E. (2011). Word lengths are optimized for efficient communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(9), 3526–3529.
Pinker, S., & Bloom, P. (1990). Natural-Language and Natural-Selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13(4), 707–726.
Poplack, S., & Tagliamonte, S. (1999). The grammaticization of going to in (African American) English. Language Variation and Change, 11(03), 315–342.
Ramachandran, V.S., & Hubbard, E.M. (2001). Synaesthesia–a window into perception, thought and language. Journal of consciousness studies, 8(12), 3–34.
Robinson, J.H., & Griffith, P.L. (1979). On the scientific status of iconicity. Sign Language Studies, 25(1), 297–315.
Sandler, W., Meir, I., Padden, C., & Aronoff, M. (2005). The emergence of grammar: Systematic structure in a new language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(7), 2661–2665.
Sauter, D.A., Eisner, F., Ekman, P., & Scott, S.K. (2010). Cross-cultural recognition of basic emotions through nonverbal emotional vocalizations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(6), 2408–2412.
Scott-Phillips, T.C., & Kirby, S. (2010). Language evolution in the laboratory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(9), 411–417.
Scott-Phillips, T.C., Kirby, S., & Ritchie, G.R.S. (2009). Signalling signalhood and the emergence of communication. Cognition, 113(2), 226–233.
Selten, R., & Warglien, M. (2007). The emergence of simple languages in an experimental coordination game. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1041, 7361–7366.
Shillcock, R., Kirby, S., McDonald, S., & Brew, C. (2001). Filled pauses and their status in the mental lexicon. Paper presented at the ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop (ITRW) on Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech.
Smith, A.D.M. (2014). Models of language evolution and change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 5(3), 281–293.
Tamariz, M. (2008). Exploring systematicity between phonological and context-cooccurrence representations of the mental lexicon. Mental Lexicon, 3(2).
. (2011). Linguistic Structure Evolves to Match Meaning Structure. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
Tamariz, M., Ellison, T.M., Barr, D.J., & Fay, N. (2014). Cultural selection drives the evolution of human communication systems. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 281(1788).
Theisen, C.A., Oberlander, J., & Kirby, S. (2010). Systematicity and arbitrariness in novel communication systems. Interaction Studies, 11(1), 14–32.
Cited by (28)
Cited by 28 other publications
Thompson, Arthur Lewis, Thomas Van Hoey, Aaron Wing Cheung Chik & Youngah Do
Hawkins, Robert D., Megumi Sano, Noah D. Goodman & Judith E. Fan
Moita, Mara, Ana Maria Abreu & Ana Mineiro
Wisher, Izzy & Kristian Tylén
Cherkes, Bohdan & Yuliya Idak
Fay, Nicolas, Bradley Walker, T. Mark Ellison, Zachary Blundell, Naomi De Kleine, Murray Garde, Casey J. Lister & Susan Goldin-Meadow
Slonimska, Anita, Asli Özyürek & Olga Capirci
Woźniak, Mateusz & Guenther Knoblich
Kempe, Vera, Nicolas Gauvrit, Nikolay Panayotov, Sheila Cunningham & Monica Tamariz
Mineiro, Ana, Inmaculada Concepción Báez-Montero, Mara Moita, Isabel Galhano-Rodrigues & Alexandre Castro-Caldas
Monaghan, Padraic & Seán G. Roberts
Nielsen, Alan KS & Mark Dingemanse
Planer, Ronald J. & David Kalkman
Shea, Kaela, Olivier St-Cyr & Tom Chau
Żywiczyński, Przemysław, Sławomir Wacewicz & Casey Lister
Lister, C.J., B. Walker & N. Fay
Bohn, Manuel, Josep Call & Michael Tomasello
Castillo, Lucía, Kenny Smith & Holly P. Branigan
Kempe, Vera, Nicolas Gauvrit, Alison Gibson & Margaret Jamieson
Worthington, Maulfry, Marjolein Dobber & Bert van Oers
Cohn, Neil
Edmiston, Pierce, Marcus Perlman & Gary Lupyan
Fay, Nicolas, Bradley Walker, Nik Swoboda & Simon Garrod
Fay, Nicolas, Bradley Walker, Nik Swoboda, Ichiro Umata, Takugo Fukaya, Yasuhiro Katagiri & Simon Garrod
Nölle, Jonas, Marlene Staib, Riccardo Fusaroli & Kristian Tylén
Lister, Casey J. & Nicolas Fay
2017. How to create a human communication system. Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 18:3 ► pp. 314 ff.
Misyak, Jennifer, Takao Noguchi & Nick Chater
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
