Cover not available

Article published In: Discourse-pragmatic markers, fillers and filled pauses: Pragmatic, cognitive, multimodal and sociolinguistic perspectives
Edited by Kate Beeching, Grant Howie, Minna Kirjavainen and Anna Piasecki
[Pragmatics & Cognition 29:2] 2022
► pp. 324–346

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Linguistic and paralinguistic constraints on the function of (eu) acho que as DM in Brazilian Portuguese

A multilevel approach

ORCiD logo with link | Universidade Federal de Sergipe
ORCiD logo with link | Universidade Federal de Sergipe
ORCiD logo with link | Universidade Federal de Sergipe
Published online: 11 April 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.21024.fre
Like I think in English, (eu) acho que in Brazilian Portuguese can function as a discourse marker (DM) with more than one meaning, and these meanings are curiously diametrically opposed. Certainty, doubt or uncertainty is inferred by hearers in an interactional context. In a sample of audio-video recorded interviews, the occurrences of this DM were classified by meaning, and association tests between meanings and linguistic factors (pronoun realization, polarity, position in utterance), real-world features (type of evidence from which the speaker says something, and discursive topic), prosody (F0, intensity and duration), and facial expressions were carried out. Differences that distinguish these factors were identified among certainty, doubt and uncertainty uses. The certainty meaning of (eu) acho que was associated with pronoun presence, more formality and topics in which the speaker had direct evidence. Uncertainty and doubt were associated with pronoun absence, less formality and topics in which the speaker did not have direct evidence. Patterns of intensity and duration acted to distinguish the certainty, doubt and uncertainty meanings of (eu) acho que. In a conditional decision tree, the position in utterance, presence of a pronoun, type of speaker’s evidence, discursive topic, and duration helped to disambiguate the meanings of (eu) acho que. These results suggest the relevance of a multilevel approach to describe DM, in different languages, at least with respect to mental state verbs.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Features of the meanings of (eu) acho que in Brazilian Portuguese
    • 2.1Structural features
    • 2.2Informational features
    • 2.3Prosodic features
    • 2.4Emotional features
    • 2.5A multilevel approach for DMs
  • 3.Method
    • 3.1Data collection
    • 3.2Analysis of the data
    • 3.3Statistical analysis
  • 4.Results
  • 5.Discussion and conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (47)
References
Aijmer, Karin. 2011. I think – An English modal particle. In Toril Swan & Olaf Jansen Westvik (eds.), Modality in Germanic languages, 1–48. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Antunes, Leandra Batista & Véronique Aubergé. 2015. Análise prosódica da certeza e da incerteza em fala espontânea e atuada [Prosodic analysis of certainty and uncertainty in spontaneous and acted speech]. Revista Diadorim 17(2). 212–237. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Antunes, Leandra Batista, Véronique Aubergé & Yuko Sasa. 2014. Certainty and uncertainty in Brazilian Portuguese: Methodology of spontaneous corpus collection and data analysis. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Speech Prosody, 110–114. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Babel, Anna M. 2009. Dizque, evidentiality, and stance in Valley Spanish. Language in Society 38(4). 487–511. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baltrusaitis, Tadas, Amir Zadeh, Yao Chong Lim & Louis-Philippe Morency. 2018. Openface 2.0: Facial behaviour analysis toolkit. In Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition, 59–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & David Weenink. 2018. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.37. [URL]
Casseb-Galvão, Vânia Cristina. 1999. O achar no português no Brasil: Um caso de gramaticalização [The achar in Brazilian Portuguese: A grammaticalization case]. Campinas: Universidade Estadual de Campinas MA dissertation.
. 2001. Evidencialidade e gramaticalização no português do Brasil: Os usos da expressão diz que [Evidentiality and grammaticalization in Brazilian Portuguese: The uses of the expression diz que]. Araraquara: Universidade Estadual Paulista PhD dissertation.
Castellano, Ginevra, Loic Kessous & George Caridakis. 2008. Emotion recognition through multiple modalities: Face, body gesture, speech. In Christian Peter & Russell Beale (eds.), Affect and emotion in human-computer interaction, 92–103. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cruz, Marisa, Marc Swerts & Sónia Frota. 2017. The role of intonation and visual cues in the perception of sentence types: Evidence from European Portuguese varieties. Laboratory Phonology 81. 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duarte, Maria Eugênia Lamoglia. 2000. The loss of the ‘avoid pronoun’ principle in Brazilian Portuguese. In Mary Aizawa Kato & Esmeralda Vailati Negrão (eds.), Brazilian Portuguese and the null subject parameter, 17–36. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ekman, Paul. 2000. Basic emotions. In Tim Dalgleish & Mick Power (eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion, 45–60. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ekman, Paul & Wallace V. Friesen. 1975. Unmasking the face: A guide to recognizing emotions from facial clues. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1978. Facial Action Coding System: A technique for the measurement of facial movement. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 1999. What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics 31(7). 931–952. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Freitag, Raquel Meister Ko. 2003. Gramaticalização e variação de acho (que) e parece (que) na fala de Florianópolis [Grammaticalization and variation of acho (que) and parece (que) in Florianópolis’ speech]. Florianópolis: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina PhD dissertation.
Freitag, Raquel Meister Ko., Regina Célia Fernandes Cruz & Thiago da Cunha Nascimento. 2021. The grammar in the body: On embodied resources in meaning construction and negotiation. Cadernos de Linguística 2(2). 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Freitag, Raquel Meister Ko. & Bruno Pinheiro. 2020. Modelo de árvore de inferência condicional para explicar usos linguísticos variáveis [Conditional inference tree model for explaining variable language usages]. In Cristina dos Santos Carvalho, Norma da Silva Lopes & Angélica Rodrigues. Sociolinguística e funcionalismo: Vertentes e interfaces [Sociolinguistics and functionalism: Τrends and interfaces], 317–342. Salvador: Editora Uneb. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Freitag, Raquel Meister Ko., Julian Tejada, Bruno Pinheiro & Paloma Cardoso. 2021. Função na língua, generalização e reprodutibilidade [Function in language, generalization and reproducibility]. Revista da Abralin 20(1). 1–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gonçalves, Sebastião Carlos Leite. 2003. Gramaticalização, modalidade epistêmica e evidencialidade: Um estudo de caso no português do Brasil [Grammaticalization, epistemic modality and evidentiality: A case study in Brazilian Portuguese]. Campinas: Universidade Estadual de Campinas PhD dissertation.
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. 1998. The semantic status of discourse markers. Lingua 104(3–4). 235–260. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hirst, Daniel. 2012. Analyse tier Praat script.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 1990. Hedges and boosters in women’s and men’s speech. Language & Communication 10(3). 185–205. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hothorn, Torsten, Kurt Hornik & Achim Zeileis. 2006. Unbiased recursive partitioning: Α conditional inference framework. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 15(3). 651–674. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoye, Leo Francis. 2005. “You may think that; I couldn’t possibly comment!” Modality studies: Contemporary research and future directions. Part I. Journal of Pragmatics 37(8). 1295–1321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levshina, Natalia. 2020. Conditional inference trees and random forests. In Madali Paquot & Stefan Gries (eds.), A practical handbook of corpus linguistics, 611–643. Bern: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, Binmei. 2009. Chinese discourse markers in oral speech of mainland Mandarin speakers. In Proceedings of the 21st North American conference on Chinese linguistics, 358–374.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macedo, Alzira Tavares de. 1998. Iniciadores de turno em função da polidez [Shift starters in politeness functions]. Revista de Estudos da linguagem 7(2). 9–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ningelgen, Jana & Peter Auer. 2017. Is there a multimodal construction based on non-deictic so in German? Linguistics Vanguard 3(1). 15. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oliveira e Silva, Gisele Machline de & Alzira Tavares de Macedo. 1996. Análise sociolinguística de alguns marcadores conversacionais [Sociolinguistic analysis of some conversational markers]. In Alzira Tavares de Macedo, Claudia Roncarati & Maria Cecília Mollica (eds.), Variação e discurso, 11–49. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oliveira, Bruna Ferreira Valenzuela de. 2011. A prosódia na expressão das atitudes de dúvida, incerteza e incredulidade no português brasileiro [Prosody in the expression of attitudes of doubt, uncertainty and disbelief in Brazilian Portuguese]. Belo Horizonte: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais PhD dissertation.
Redeker, Gisela. 2006. Discourse markers as attentional cues at discourse transitions. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to discourse particles, 339–358. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rilliard, Albert & Moraes, João Antônio. 2017. Social affective variations in Brazilian Portuguese: A perceptual and acoustic analysis. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem 25(3). 1043–1074. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Romano, Manuela & Maria José Cuenca. 2013. Discourse markers, structure and emotionality in oral narratives. Narrative Inquiry 23(2). 344–370. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sato, Shie. 2017. On establishing I think as a final particle in interactions: Some comparisons with sentence-final particles in Japanese. Journal of Pragmatics 1101. 83–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schoonjans, Steven. 2013. Is gesture subject to grammaticalization? Linguistic Society of Belgium 81. 1–14.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silva, Juliana Preisser de Godoy. 2008. Análise dos aspectos prosódicos na expressão da certeza e da dúvida no português brasileiro [Analysis of prosodic aspects in the expression of certainty and doubt in Brazilian Portuguese]. Belo Horizonte: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais PhD dissertation.
Swerts, Marc, Emiel Krahmer, Pashiera Barkhuysen & Lennard van de Laar. 2003. Audiovisual cues to uncertainty. In ISCA Archives – Tutorial and Research Workshop on Error Handling in Spoken Dialogue Systems, 25–30.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, Sali A. R. & Harald Baayen. 2012. Models, forests, and trees of York English: Was/Were variation as a case study for statistical practice. Language variation and change 24.21. 135–178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tejada, Julian, Raquel Meister Ko. Freitag, Bruno Pinheiro, Paloma Batista Cardoso, Victor Renê Andrade Souza & Lucas Santos Silva. 2021. Building and validation of a set of facial expression images to detect emotions: A transcultural study. Psychological Research. 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. & Anthony Mulac. 1991. A quantitative perspective on the grammaticalization of epistemic parentheticals in English. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization, 313–329. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1995. Subjectification in grammaticalization. In Dieter Stein & Susan Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wittenburg, Peter, Hennie Brugman, Albert Russel, Alex Klassmann & Han Sloetjes. 2006. ELAN: A professional framework for multimodality research. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 1556–1559.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Moraes, Lavínia de Carvalho, Irene Cristina Silvério, Rafael Alexandre Sousa Marques, Bianca de Castro Anaia, Dandara Freitas de Paula, Maria Carolina Schincariol de Faria, Iury Cleveston, Alana de Santana Correia & Raquel Meister Ko Freitag
2025. Análise de ambiguidade linguística em modelos de linguagem de grande escala (LLMs). Texto Livre 18 DOI logo
Juszczyk, Konrad & Barbara Konat
2024. The use of discourse markers in conversation: The case of “myślę” – “I think” in Polish Career Clean Coaching. Lingua Posnaniensis 66:1 ► pp. 7 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue