Cover not available

Article published In: Discourse-pragmatic markers, fillers and filled pauses: Pragmatic, cognitive, multimodal and sociolinguistic perspectives
Edited by Kate Beeching, Grant Howie, Minna Kirjavainen and Anna Piasecki
[Pragmatics & Cognition 29:2] 2022
► pp. 347369

References (23)
References
Ariel, Mira & Caterina Mauri. 2018. Why use or? Linguistics 561. 939–993. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bazzanella, Carla. 1995. I segnali discorsivi. In Lorenzo Renzi, Giampaolo Salvi & Anna Cardinaletti (eds.), Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione (vol. 31), 225–257. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beeching, Kate. 2016. Pragmatic markers in British English: Meaning in social interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beeching, Kate & Ulrich Detges. 2014. Introduction. In Kate Beeching & Ulrich Detges (eds.), Discourse functions at the left and right periphery: Crosslinguistic investigations of language use and language change, 1–23. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bernini, Giuliano. 1995. Le profrasi. In Lorenzo Renzi, Giampaolo Salvi & Anna Cardinaletti (eds.), Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione (vol. 31), 175–222. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope & Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Denis, Derek & Sali A. Tagliamonte. 2016. Innovation, right? Change, you know? Utterance-final tags in Canadian English. In Heike Pichler (ed.), Discourse-pragmatic variation and change in English: New methods and insights, 86–112. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 2014. Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics 25(3). 359–410. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin. 2006. Frames, constructions, and invariant meanings: The functional polysemy of discourse particles. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to discourse particles, 427–447. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lo Baido, Maria Cristina. 2018. Categorization via exemplification: Evidence from Italian. Folia Linguistica Historica 391. 69–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mauri, Caterina. 2021. Ad hoc categorization in linguistic interaction. In Caterina Mauri, Eugenio Goria & Ilaria Fiorentini (eds.), Building categories in interaction: Linguistic resources at work, 9–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mauri, Caterina & Andrea Sansò. 2018. Linguistic strategies for ad hoc categorization: Theoretical assessment and cross-linguistic variation. Folia Linguistica Historica 39(1). 1–35.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mauri, Caterina, Ilaria Fiorentini & Eugenio Goria. 2021. Building categories in interaction: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. In Caterina Mauri, Eugenio Goria & Ilaria Fiorentini (eds.), Building categories in interaction: Linguistic resources at work, 1–8. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mauri, Caterina, Silvia Ballarè, Eugenio Goria, Massimo Cerruti & Francesco Suriano. 2019. KIParla corpus: A new resource for spoken Italian. In Raffaella Bernardi, Roberto Navigli & Giovanni Semeraro (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics (CLiC-it).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Molinelli, Piera. 1988. Fenomeni della negazione dal latino all’italiano. Firenze: La Nuova Editrice.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. Ma anche no! Trent’anni di un’espressione di successo. Lingua Italiana. [[URL]]
Moretti, Bruno. 1993. False partenze e contraddizioni logiche convenzionalizzate: “Sì o no”? Vox Romanica 521. 85–95.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwenter, Scott A. 2000. Viewpoints and polysemy: Linking adversative and causal meanings of discourse markers. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhler & Bernd Kortmann (eds.), Cause, condition, concession, contrast: Cognitive and discourse perspectives, 257–282. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2013. Sequence organization. In Jack Sidnell & Tanya Stivers (eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis, 191–209. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tottie, Gunnel. 2014. On the use of uh and um in American English. Functions of Language 21(1). 6–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2008. “All that he endeavoured to prove was …”: On the emergence of grammatical constructions in dialogual and dialogic contexts. In Robin Cooper & Ruth Kempson (eds.), Language in flux: Dialogue coordination, language variation, change and evolution, 143–177. London: King’s College Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue