Cover not available

Article published In: New Developments in Relevance Theory
Edited by Manuel Padilla Cruz and Agnieszka Piskorska
[Pragmatics & Cognition 28:2] 2021
► pp. 277–298

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Memes as multimodal metaphors

A relevance theory analysis

 | Kingston University
Published online: 27 June 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.21010.sco
Abstract
In this article I analyse object labelling image macro internet memes as multimodal metaphors, taking the Distracted Boyfriend meme as a case study. Object labelling memes are multimodal texts in which users add labels to a stock photograph to convey messages that are often humorous or satirical in nature. Using the relevance-theoretic account of metaphor, I argue that object labelling memes are multimodal metaphors which are interpreted using the same processes as verbal metaphors. The labelling of the image guides the viewer in the construction of ad hoc concepts, and it is these ad hoc concepts that contribute to the overall meaning that is communicated. The analysis in this article is rooted in the relevance-theoretic claim that pragmatic interpretive processes are triggered by all and any ostensive acts of communication. I also draw heavily on Deirdre Wilson’s work on lexical pragmatics to show how this plays out in the case of a multimodal digital text. Memes, like verbal metaphors, do not require a special theory or framework. They can be understood as ostensive stimuli which trigger the search for an optimally relevant interpretation.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Internet memes
  • 3.Relevance, metaphors, and internet memes
    • 3.1Relevance, ostension, and memes
    • 3.2Metaphors, relevance and ad hoc concepts
  • 4.Analysis and discussion: The case of the distracted boyfriend
    • 4.1Object labelling memes and reference
    • 4.2Object labelling memes as multimodal metaphors
    • 4.3Memes, metaphor, and meaning
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (39)
References
Barthes, Roland. 1977. Image, music, text. London: Fontana.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and utterances: The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Billy. 2013. Relevance theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara & Vandelanotte, Lieven. 2017. Internet memes as multimodal constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 28(3). 565–598. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forceville, Charles. 2020. Visual and multimodal communication: Applying the relevance principle. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forceville, Charles & Clark, Billy. 2014. Can pictures have explicatures?. Linguagem em (Dis)curso, 14(3). 451–472. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. 1994. The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Glucksberg, Sam. 2001. Understanding figurative language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray, Cohn, Neil & Griffith, Bill. 2012. A user’s guide to thought and meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jewitt, Carey. 2013. Multimodal methods for researching digital technologies. In Sara Price, Carey Jewitt & Barry Brown (eds.), SAGE handbook of digital technology research, 250–265 London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Knobel, Michele & Lankshear, Colin. 2008. Remix: The art and craft of endless hybridization. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(1). 22–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Miltner, Kate M. 2014. “There’s no place for lulz on LOLCats”: The role of genre, gender, and group identity in the interpretation and enjoyment of an Internet meme. First Monday, 19(8). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oswald, Steve & Maillat, Didier. 2018. Deceptive puns: The pragmatics of humour in puns. In Cristián N. Padilla (ed.), Perspectivas sobre el significado: Desde lo biológico a lo social, 145–171. La Serena: Editorial Universidad de la Serena.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reboul, Anne. 1998. A relevance theoretic approach to reference. Relevance theory workshop, 45–50. University of Luton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1999. Reference, agreement, evolving reference and the theory of mental representations. In Martine Coene (ed.), Traiani Augusti vestigia pressa sequamur :studia 1 lingvistica in honorem L. Tasmowki, 601–616. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Recanati, François. 2012. Mental files. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Mental files and identity. In Anne Reboul (ed.) Mind, values, metaphysics: Philosophical papers Dedicated to Kevin Mulligan. University of Geneva. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, Kate. 2020. Referring expressions, pragmatics, and style: Reference and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021a. The pragmatics of rebroadcasting content on Twitter: How is retweeting relevant? Journal of Pragmatics, 1841. 52–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021b. Contrastive stress in English: Meaning, expectations and ostension. In Elly Ifantidou, Louis de Saussure & Tim Wharton (eds.), Beyond meaning, 29–41. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022. Pragmatics online. Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Segev, Elad, Nissenbaum, Asaf, Stolero, Nathan & Shifman, Limor. 2015. Families and networks of internet memes: The relationship between cohesiveness, uniqueness, and quiddity concreteness. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(4). 417–433. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William. 1597/1980. Romeo and Juliet. London: Methuen & Co. Ltd.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shifman, Limor. 2014. Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre. 1986/95. Relevance: Communciation and cognition. Second edition (with postface) ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. The mapping between the mental and the public lexicon. In Peter Carruthers & Jill Boucher (eds.), Language and thought, 184–200. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. 2008. A deflationary account of metaphor. In Raymond W. Gibbs (ed.), Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, 84–105. Cambridge: Camrbidge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre. 2015. Beyond speaker’s meaning. Croatian Journal of Philosophy, 15(44). 117–149.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wharton, Tim. 2009. Pragmatics and non-verbal communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre. 2003. Relevance and lexical pragmatics. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 15(2). 273–292.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Carston, Robyn. 2007. A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: Relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts. In Noel Burton-Roberts (ed.), Pragmatics, 230–260. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Pragmatics and the challenge of “non-propositional” effects. Journal of Pragmatics, 1451. 31–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Kolaiti, Patricia. 2017. Lexical pragmatics and implicit communication. In Piotr Cap & Marta Dynel (eds.), Implicitness: From lexis to discourse, 147–175. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Sperber, Dan. 2002. Truthfulness and relevance. Mind, 111(443). 583–632. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Meaning and relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yus, Francisco. 2018. Identity-related issues in meme communication. Internet Pragmatics, 1(1). 113–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zappavigna, Michele. 2012. Discourse of Twitter and social media: How we use language to create affiliation on the web. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (13)

Cited by 13 other publications

Babatunde, Samuel A. & Peace Olamide Obademi
2025. “Let the Poor Breathe”: A Multimodal Discourse Analysis of Selected Online Images on Economic Hardship in Nigeria. Howard Journal of Communications 36:4 ► pp. 488 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Xinhao, Dongxin Wen & Decheng Zuo
2025. Towards Detecting Chinese Harmful Memes with Fine-Grained Explanatory Augmentation. Electronics 14:17 ► pp. 3504 ff. DOI logo
Hayes, Tracey
2025. Mittens and masks: Meme commentary on the covid-19 pandemic. Computers and Composition 75 ► pp. 102910 ff. DOI logo
Koickakudy, Mitul Joseph
2025. Memes as ensemble of illocutionary acts. Language and Semiotic Studies DOI logo
Meier-Vieracker, Simon
2025. Überschreibungen. Multimodale Metaphern auf TikTok. In TikTok – Memefication und Performance [Digitale Linguistik, 2], ► pp. 47 ff. DOI logo
Meleshchenko, Olga & Olena Radchenko
2025. Multimodal simile in internet memes on X responding to the 2024 U.S. presidential election. Cognition, Communication, Discourse :30 ► pp. 92 ff. DOI logo
Sun, Ya, Pan Zheng & Chenle Li
2025. #greenCNPC, #CleanerEnergy: Pragmatic use of self-praise metaphors in Chinese corporate discourse on Twitter/X. Journal of Pragmatics 249 ► pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Topor, Lev
2025. 3. Memetic antisemitism. In Imagery of Hate Online, ► pp. 33 ff. DOI logo
Altahmazi, Thulfiqar H.
2024. Humorous but hateful. Internet Pragmatics 7:2 ► pp. 219 ff. DOI logo
Anderau, Glenn & Daniel Barbarrusa
2024. The Function of Memes in Political Discourse. Topoi 43:5 ► pp. 1529 ff. DOI logo
Sigurdardottir, Heba & Hanna Rautajoki
2024. Embodying scenes of moral disorder: Bodily gestures as a site of signification in feminist TikTok activism. Nordic Journal of Media Studies 6:1 ► pp. 11 ff. DOI logo
Wang, Jingjing, Joshua Luo, Grace Yang, Allen Hong & Feng Luo
2023. 2023 International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA), ► pp. 1338 ff. DOI logo
Yus, Francisco
2023. Meme-Mediated Humorous Communication. In Pragmatics of Internet Humour, ► pp. 245 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue