Cover not available

Article published In: New Developments in Relevance Theory
Edited by Manuel Padilla Cruz and Agnieszka Piskorska
[Pragmatics & Cognition 28:2] 2021
► pp. 252–276

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

On the interpretation of utterances with expressive expletives

 | Universidad de Sevilla
Published online: 27 June 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.21008.pad
Abstract
Expressive adjectives or expressive expletives have been argued to voice the speaker’s attitude towards the referent of the noun with which they co-occur, even though the attitude may be felt to be expressed about the referent of another sentential constituent or the state of affairs alluded to in the sentence where they are inserted. A previous pragmatic approach suggests that this is possible because these expletives perform an individual speech act, while a syntactic approach posits a feature whose detachment from a particular constituent enables the speaker’s attitude to target the referent of another sentential constituent or even on the entire proposition expressed. This paper proposes an alternative relevance-theoretic account of the interpretation of utterances containing expressive expletives, which considers pragmatic factors and the cognitive processes in comprehension. It is grounded in contributions on the output of lexical pragmatic processes and the role of paralinguistic clues in utterance comprehension.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Expressive expletives and attitude expression
  • 3.Some problems with the extant approaches
  • 4.Towards a relevance-theoretic account
    • 4.1On the contribution of expressive expletives to communication
    • 4.2On the expression of attitudes towards another referent and the propositional content
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (73)
References
Bayard, Donn & Sateesh Krishnayya. 2001. Gender, expletive use, and context: Male and female expletive use in structured and unstructured conversation among New Zealand university students. Women and Language 24(1). 1–15.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 1987. Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. Understanding utterances. An introduction to pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Relevance and linguistic meaning. The semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. On the descriptive ineffability of expressive meaning. Journal of Pragmatics 43(14). 3537–3550. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Slurs and expletives: A case against a general account of expressive meaning. Language Sciences 521. 22–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Börjars, Kersti & Kate Burridge. 2001. Introducing English grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bross, Fabian. 2021. On the interpretation of expressive adjectives: Pragmatics or Syntax? Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 6(1). 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 2000. Explicature and semantics. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 121. 1–44.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Thoughts and utterances. The pragmatics of explicit communication. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013a. Word meaning, what is said and explicature. In Carlo Penco & Filippo Domaneschi (eds.), What is said and what is not, 175–204. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013b. Implicature, explicature, and truth-theoretic semantics. In Maite Ezcurdia & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), The semantics-pragmatics boundary in philosophy, 261–283. Peterborough: Broadview Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Billy. 2007. “Blazing a trail”: Moving from natural to linguistic meaning in accounting for the tones of English. In Randi A. Nilsen, Nana A. Appiah Amfo & Kaja Borthen (eds.), Interpreting utterances: Pragmatics and its interfaces. Essays in honour of Thorstein Fretheim, 69–81. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Collins, Peter & Carmella Hollo. 2000. English grammar. An introduction. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Daly, Nicola, Janet Holmes, Jonathan Newton & Maria Stubbe. 2004. Expletives as solidarity signals in FTAs on the factory floor. Journal of Pragmatics 36(5). 945–964. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Klerk, Vivian. 1991. Expletives: Men only? Communication Monographs 58(2). 156–169. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frazier, Lyn, Brian Dillon & Charles Clifton. 2015. A note on interpreting damn expressives: Transferring the blame. Language and Cognition 7(2). 291–304. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenbaum, Sidney & Randolph Quirk. 1993. A student’s grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert P. 1957. Meaning. Philosophical Review 661. 377–388. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gutzmann, Daniel. 2019. The grammar of expressivity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Jacqueline Guéron. 1999. English grammar. A generative perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, Alison. 2017. Lexical pragmatics, explicature and ad hoc concepts. In Ilse Depraetere & Raphael Salkie (eds.), Semantics and pragmatics: Drawing a line, 55–100. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Robert, Larry G. Coleman & John A. Daly. 1980. Expletives and androgyny. Anthropological Linguistics 22(3). 131–137.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney. 1988. English grammar. An outline. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hughes, Susan E. 1992. Expletives of lower working-class women. Language in Society 21(2). 391–303. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ifantidou, Elly. 1992. Sentential adverbs and relevance. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 41. 193–214.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jary, Mark. 2016. Rethinking explicit utterance content. Journal of Pragmatics 1021. 24–37. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jay, Timothy B. 2005. American women: Their cursing habits and religiosity. In Allyson Jule (ed.), Gender and the language of religion, 63–84. London: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaye, Barbara K. & Barry S. Sapolsky. 2004. Offensive language in prime-time television: Four years after television age and content ratings. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 48(4). 554–569. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam. 1988. How gestures can become like words? In Fernando Poyatos (ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives in nonverbal communication, 131–141. Toronto: Hogrefe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Madella, Pauline. 2020. Prosodic pointing: From pragmatic awareness to pragmatic competence in Chinese hearers of L2 English. PhD dissertation, University of Brighton.
Mazzarella, Diana. 2013. ‘Optimal relevance’ as a pragmatic criterion: The role of epistemic vigilance. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 251. 20–45.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCloskey, Laura A. & Lerita M. Coleman. 1992. Difference without dominance: Children’s talk in mixed- and same-sex dyads. Sex Roles 27(5–6). 241–257. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNeill, David. 1992. Hand and mind. What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murphy, Bróna. 2009. ‘She’s a fucking ticket’: The pragmatics of fuck in Irish English – an age and gender perspective. Corpora 4(1). 85–106. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Padilla Cruz, Manuel. 2009a. Towards an alternative relevance-theoretic approach to interjections. International Review of Pragmatics 1(1). 182–206. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009b. Might interjections encode concepts? More questions than answers. Łodź Papers in Pragmatics 5(2). 241–270. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Understanding and overcoming pragmatic failure in intercultural communication: From focus on speakers to focus on hearers. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 51(1). 23–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Interlocutors-related and hearer-specific causes of misunderstanding: Processing strategy, confirmation bias and weak vigilance. Research in Language 15(1). 11–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018a. Expressive APs and expletive NPs revisited: Refining the extant relevance-theoretic procedural account. Lingua 2051. 54–70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018b. Pragmatic competence injustice. Social Epistemology. A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy 32(3). 143–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020a. Towards a relevance-theoretic approach to the diminutive morpheme. Russian Journal of Linguistics 24(4). 774–795. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020b. El malentendido. In Victoria Escandell Vidal, José Amenós Pons & Aoife Kathleen Ahern (eds.), Pragmática, 384–407. Madrid: Akal.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022. Is free enrichment always free? Revisiting ad hoc-concept construction. Journal of Pragmatics 1871. 130–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. In press. Ad hoc concepts, affective attitude and epistemic stance. Pragmatics & Cognition.
. Submitted. Paralanguage and ad hoc concepts. Pragmatics.
Potts, Christopher. 2005. The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007a. The expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics 33(2). 165–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007b. The centrality of expressive indices. Theoretical Linguistics 33(2). 255–268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Recanati, François. 1989. The pragmatics of what is said. Mind & Language 4(4). 295–329. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, Kate. 2019. Referring expressions, pragmatics, and style: Reference and beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan. 1994. Understanding verbal understanding. In Jean Khalfa (ed.), What is intelligence? 179–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance. Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. Relevance. Communication and cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. Beyond speaker’s meaning. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 15(44). 117–149. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Staley, Constance M. 1978. Male-female use of expletives: A heck of a difference in expectations. Anthropological Linguistics 20(8). 367–380.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stanley, Jason. 2000. Context and logical form. Linguistics and Philosophy 23(4). 391–434. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Making it articulated. Mind & Language 17(1–2). 149–168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wharton, Tim. 2001. Natural pragmatics and natural codes. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 131. 109–158.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Paul Grice, saying and meaning. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 141. 207–248.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Pragmatics and non-verbal communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Pragmatics and prosody. In Keith Allan & Kasia Jazczolt (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of pragmatics, 567–584. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. That bloody so-and-so has retired: Expressives revisited. Lingua 175–1761. 20–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre. 2016. Reassessing the conceptual-procedural distinction. Lingua 175–1761. 5–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Robyn Carston. 2006. Metaphor, relevance and the ‘emergent property’ issue. Mind & Language 21(3). 404–433. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. A unitary approach to lexical pragmatics: Relevance, inference and ad hoc concepts. In Noel Burton-Roberts (ed.), Pragmatics, 230–259. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Pragmatics and the challenge of ‘non-propositional’ effects. Journal of Pragmatics 1451. 31–38. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber. 1993. Linguistic form and relevance. Lingua 90(1–2). 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Relevance theory. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 141. 249–287.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Relevance theory. In Larry Horn & Gregory Ward (eds.), The handbook of pragmatics, 607–632. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre & Tim Wharton. 2006. Relevance and prosody. Journal of Pragmatics 38(10). 1559–1579. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Yus, Francisco
2025. Inferring from Emojis: From Propositions to Feelings and Emotions. In Emoji Pragmatics, ► pp. 173 ff. DOI logo
Glauch, Kalle
2024. The Culprit-Hypothesis: how blame attribution influences the interpretation of expressive adjectives. Language and Cognition 16:4 ► pp. 2169 ff. DOI logo
Ifantidou, Elly
2024. Pragmatics and Cognition. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2023. Paralanguage and ad hoc concepts. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 33:3 ► pp. 343 ff. DOI logo
Padilla Cruz, Manuel
2024. Irina T. Pandarova, Revisiting sentence adverbials and relevance (Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 334). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 2021. Pp. ix + 254. ISBN 9789027213730.. English Language and Linguistics 28:4 ► pp. 849 ff. DOI logo
Piskorska, Agnieszka & Manuel Padilla Cruz
2023. Concepts and context in relevance-theoretic pragmatics. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 33:3 ► pp. 313 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue