Cover not available

Article published In: Writing and the Mind
Edited by David R. Olson and Marcelo Dascal †
[Pragmatics & Cognition 21:3] 2013
► pp. 431–447

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Literacy and the languages of rationality

 | University of Toronto
Published online: 24 July 2015
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.21.3.01ols
Literacy, specifically the use of writing for rational purposes, adds a new dimension to the traditional problem of the relation between language, thought and rationality. Central to rational thought are the logical relations expressed by such terms as “is”, “or”, “and” and “not”. Whereas some see these concepts as fundamental and innate, it is here argued that such terms exhibit a diverse range of uses in speech and thought but through literacy and education they become explicit objects of thought and formalized or ‘normed’ into logical operators as part of a literate rationality. This more formal orientation to language is seen as metarepresentational and may be shown to have both an historical and a developmental trajectory.
References (51)
Adams, M.J. 1990. Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bialystok E. and Craik F.I.M. 2009. “Cognitive and linguistic processing in the bilingual mind”. Current Directions in Psychological Science 19(1): 19–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, D. 1986. Spoken and written textual dimensions in English: Resolving the contradictory findings. Language 621: 384–414. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Are there linguistic consequences of literacy? Comparing the potentials of language use in speech and writing”. In D.R. Olson and N. Torrance (eds), Cambridge Handbook of Literacy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 75–91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Braine, M.D. and Rumain, B. 1981. “Children’s comprehension of ‘or’: Evidence for a sequence of competencies”. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 311: 46–70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brandom, R. 2000. Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caines, M. 2009, May 15. “Arrange one’s face: Review of H. Mantel’s ‘Wolf Hall’”. Times Literary Supplement. Retrieved from [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chartier, R. 1995. Forms and Meanings. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, A. 2008. Supersizing the Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crain, S. and Khlentzos, D. 2010. “The logic instinct”. Mind and Language 251: 30–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Donaldson, M. 1978. Children’s Minds. Glasgow: Fontana/Collins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferreiro, E. and Teborsky, A. 1982. Literacy Before Schooling. Exeter, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fleming, J.D. 2007. “Making sense of science and the literal: Modern semantics and early modern hermeneutics”. In K. Killeen and P.J. Forshaw (eds), The Word and the World: Biblical Exegesis and Early Modern Science. Palgrave Macmillan, 45–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fodor, J. 1975. The Language of Thought. New York: Crowell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, W.G. 1976. The Language of Disjunction. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. OISE/University of Toronto.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
French, L. and Nelson, K. 1985. Young Children’s Understanding of Relational Terms. New York: Springer Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gadamar, H.-G. 1975. Truth and Method. London: Sheed & Ward.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gaskell, Mrs. 1948. Mary Barton. London: Dent.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goody, J. and Watt, I. 1963. “The consequences of literacy”. Comparative Studies in Society and History 5(3): 304–345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H.P. 1989. Studies in the Ways with Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hallidy, M.A.K. 1985. Spoken and Written Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harris, R. 2009. Rationality and the Literate Mind. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halverson, J. 1991. “Olson on literacy”. Language in Society 201: 619–640. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hilton, D.J. 1995. “The social context of reasoning: Conversational inference and rational judgment”. Psychological Bulletin 1181: 48–271. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Himmelmann, N.P. 2006. “The challenges of segmenting spoken language”. In J. Gippert, N.P. Himmelmann, and V. Mosel (eds) Essentials of Language Documentation. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, 253–274. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Homer, B. and Olson, D.R. 1999. “Literacy and children’s conception of words”. Written Language and Literacy 2(1): 113–140. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. 1996. “On the reality of cognitive illusions”. Psychological Review 103(3): 582–591. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leezenberg, M. 2001. Contexts of Metaphor. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, S.C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levy-Bruhl, L. 1926. How Natives Think. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Locke, J. 1961. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. London: Dent. (Original work published 1690)Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lundberg, I., Frost, J., and Petersen, O.P. 1988. “Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children”. Reading Research Quarterly 231: 263–284. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luria, A. 1976. Cognitive Development: Its Cultural and Social Foundations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macnamara, J. 1986. A Border Dispute: The Place of Logic in Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McLuhan, M. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Noveck, I.A. 2001. “When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigation of scalar implicatures”. Cognition 781: 165–188. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olson, D.R. 1977. “From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing”. Harvard Educational Review 47(3): 257–281. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. The World on Paper: The Conceptual and Cognitive Implications of Writing and Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. “The written representation of negation”. Pragmatics and Cognition 51: 235–252. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Narrative, cognition and rationality”. In J.P. Gee and M. Handford (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, 604–615.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olson, D.R. and Astington, J.W. (2013). “Preschool children conflate pragmatic agreement and semantic truth”. First Language 331: 617–627. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olson, D.R. and Oatley, K. 2014. “Literacy and thought: The quotation theory of writing”. Written Communication 311: 4–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Papafragou, A. and Musolino, J. 2003. “Scalar implicatures: Experiments at the semantic-pragmatic interface”. Cognition 86(3): 253–282. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piaget, J. 1962. The Psychology of Intelligence. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simpson, J. 2007. Burning to Read: English Fundamentalism and Its Reformation Opponents. Cambridge, MA: Belknap/Harvard University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Snow, C. and Uccelli, P. 2009. “The challenge of academic language”. In D.R. Olson and N. Torrance (eds), The Cambridge Handbook of Literacy. New York: Cambridge University Press, 112–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sprat, T. 1966. In J.I. Cope and H.W. Jones (eds), History of the Royal Society of London for the Improving of Natural Knowledge. St. Louis: Washington University Press. (Original work published in 1667).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stanovich, K. 1999. Who is Rational? Studies of Individual Differences in Reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stanovich, K.E. 2009. What Intelligence Tests Miss: The Psychology of Rational Thought. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1962. Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G.E.M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yuill, N. 2009. “The relation between ambiguity understanding and metalinguistic discussion of joking riddles in good and poor comprehenders: Potential for intervention and possible processes of change”. First Language 291: 65–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Koller, Aaron
2024. The Evolving Definition of “Word” in Early Northwest Semitic Writing: From ‏דברים‎ to ‏תיבות‎. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 83:1 ► pp. 123 ff. DOI logo
Olson, David R.
2022. Two cheers for literacy: Walter Ong, President Trump and the literate mind. Explorations in Media Ecology 21:1 ► pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Hambye, Philippe
2017. Langues et discours comme objets sociologiques : une illustration en sociologie de l’éducation. Langage et société N° 160-161:2 ► pp. 59 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue