Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 27:2 (2020) ► pp.457–473

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

An experimental study of the detection of clicks in English

 | University of St. ThomasMinnesota
 | University of St. ThomasMinnesota
Published online: 6 October 2021
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.20009.vig
Abstract
This experimental study sets out to determine whether people detect click sounds in American English. Recent research has documented the use of non-phonemic clicks in a variety of languages to fulfill a range of functions such as sequence management or signaling searches and different types of attitudinal stance. While these clicks are acoustically salient and have been reported to occur with a frequency of up to 14 per minute in British English, they have not been widely investigated until relatively recently. For this experiment, we designed video stimuli consisting of A and B pairs of approximately 10 seconds of speech, one with a click and the other with the click edited out. We gave 118 participants a questionnaire and asked if they could detect a difference between the pairs of videos. The results indicate that the majority of participants, between 79% and 86%, do not detect click sounds.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
  • 3.Method
    • 3.1Participants
    • 3.2Video stimuli
    • 3.3Preliminary experiments
      • 3.3.1Edit detection
      • 3.3.2Pilot
    • 3.4Instrument and procedure
    • 3.5Data coding and analysis
    • 3.6Research hypotheses
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Quantitative
    • 4.2Qualitative
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
References (47)
References
Arlington, Jody, Sebastian Brenninkmeyer, Danielle Arn, Rita Grundhauser & Daniel O’Connell. 1992. A usual extreme case: Pause reports of informal spontaneous dialogue. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 30(2). 161–163. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arnold, Jennifer, Maria Fagnano & Michael Tanenhaus. 2003. Disfluencies signal theee, um, new information. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32(1). 25–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benor, Sarah. 2004. Second style acquisition: The linguistic socialization of newly orthodox Jews. Stanford University dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Block, Ned. 2007. Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 301. 481–548. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brennan, Susan & Maurice Williams. 1995. The feeling of another’s knowing: Prosody and filled pauses as cues to listeners about the metacognitive states of speakers. Journal of Memory and Language 341. 383–398. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert & Jean Fox Tree. 2002. Using uh and um in spontaneous dialog. Cognition 841. 73–111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Christentfeld, Nicholas. 1995. Does it hurt to say um? Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 19(3). 171–186. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duez, Danielle. 1985. Perceptions of silent pauses in continuous speech. Language and Speech 28(4). 377–389. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry & Thomas Bever. 1965. The psychological reality of linguistic segments. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 41. 414–420. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox Tree, Jean. 2001. Listeners’ uses of um and uh in speech comprehension. Memory and Cognition 29(2). 320–326. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Interpreting pauses and ums at turn exchanges. Discourse Processes 34(1). 37–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gold, Erica, Peter French & Philip Harrison. 2013. Clicking behavior as a possible speaker discriminant in English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 43(3). 339–349. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
González Temer, Verónica. 2014. Clicks in Chilean Spanish conversation. In Theodora Lee (ed.), Proceedings of the first postgraduate and academic researchers in linguistics at York, 74–99. York: University of York.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hieke, Adolf, Sabine Kowal & Daniel O’Connell. 1983. The trouble with “articulatory” pauses. Language and Speech 26(3). 203–214. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jokinen, Kristiina. 2010. Hesitation and uncertainty as feedback. DiSS-LPSS 5th workshop on disfluency in spontaneous speech and 2nd international symposium on linguistic patterns in spontaneous speech, 103–106. Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kayser, Christoph, Christopher Petkov, Michael Lippert & Nikos Logothetis. 2005. Current Biology 15(21). 1943–1947. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krahmer, Emiel & Marc Swerts. 2005. How children and adults produce and perceive uncertainty in audiovisual speech. Language and Speech 481. 29–53. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Xiaoting. 2020. Click-initiated self-repair in changing the sequential trajectory of actions-in-progress. Research on Language and Social Interaction 53(1). 90–117. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, James & Winifred Strange. 1968. The perception of hesitation in spontaneous speech. Perception & Psychophysics 3(6). 427–438. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mattys, Sven & Jamie Clark. 2002. Lexical activity in speech processing: Evidence from pause detection. Journal of Memory and Language 47(3). 343–359. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mattys, Sven, Christopher W. Pleydell-Pearce, James Melhorn & Sharron E. Whitecross. 2005. Detecting silent pauses in speech: A new tool for measuring on-line lexical and semantic processing. Psychological Science 16(12). 958–964. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGuire, Grant. 2010. A brief primer on experimental designs for speech perception research (Unpublished manuscript). Santa Cruz: University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moreno, Julia. 2019. [!] What’s the name of it? [!]: Phonetic clicks in word search strategies in Glasgow. In Sasha Calhoun, Paola Escudero, Marija Tabain & Paul Warren (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th international congress of phonetic sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019, 1823–1827. Canberra, Australia: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ogden, Richard. 2013. Clicks and percussives in English conversation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 43(3). 299–320. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. Audibly not saying something with clicks. Research on Language and Social Interaction 53(1). 66–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paschen, Ludger. 2019. On clicks in Russian everyday communication. In Nicole Richter & Nadine Thielemann (eds.), Urban voices: The sociolinguistics, grammar and pragmatics of spoken Russian, 237–257. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pillion, Betsy. 2019. Acoustic properties of para-phonemic sounds: Clicks in American English. In Sasha Calhoun, Paola Escudero, Marija Tabain & Paul Warren (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th international congress of phonetic sciences, Melbourne, Australia 2019, 2660–2664. Canberra, Australia: Australasian Speech Science and Technology Association Inc.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pinto, Derrin & Donny Vigil. 2018. Clicks as discourse markers in Peninsular Spanish. Spanish in Context 15(3). 441–464. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Searches and clicks in Peninsular Spanish. Pragmatics 29(1). 83–105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. Spanish clicks in discourse marker combinations. Journal of Pragmatics 1591. 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reber, Elisabeth. 2012. Affectivity in interaction. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reber, Arthur & John Anderson. 1970. The perception of clicks in linguistic and nonlinguistic messages. Perception and Pyschophysics 8(2). 81–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scherer, Klaus, Harvey London & Jared Wolf. 1973. The voice of confidence: Paralinguistic cues and audience evaluation. Journal of Research in Personality 7(1). 31–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schleef, Erik. 2019. The evaluation of unfilled pauses: Limits of the prestige, solidarity and dynamism dimensions. Lingua 2281. 1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, Walter & Richard Shiffrin. 1977. Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review 84(1). 1–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trouvain, Jürgen. 2014. Laughing, breathing, clicking – The prosody of nonverbal vocalisations. In Proceedings of the conference on speech prosody (SP7), 598–602. Dublin, IE. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. On clicks in German. In Adrian Leemann, María-José Kolly, Stephan Schmid & Volker Dellwo (eds.), Phonetics and phonology: Studies from German-speaking Europe, 21–33. Frankfurt/Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Trouvain, Jürgen & Zofia Malisz. 2016. Inter-speech clicks in an Interspeech keynote. In Proceedings of Interspeech, 1397–1401. San Francisco, CA. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watanabe, Michiko. 2003. The constituent complexity and types of fillers in Japanese. In Maria-Josep Solé, Daniel Recasens & Joaquin Romero (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th international congress of phonetic sciences, 2473–2476. Adelaide: Causal Productions.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watanabe, Michiko, Keikichi Hirose, Yasuharu Den & Nobuaki Minematsu. 2008. Filled pauses as cues to the complexity of upcoming phrases for native and non-native listeners. Speech Communication 50(2). 81–94. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wright, Melissa. 2005. Studies of the phonetics-interaction interface: Clicks and interactional structures in English conversation. York: University of York dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Clicks as markers of new sequences in English conversation. In Jürgen Trouvain & William Barry (eds.), Proceedings of the 16th international congress of phonetic sciences, 1069–1072. Germany: Universität des Saarlandes.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011a. On clicks in English talk-in-interaction. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 41(2). 207–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011b. The phonetics–interaction interface in the initiation of closings in everyday English telephone calls. Journal of Pragmatics 43(4). 1080–1099. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xiaoming, Jiang & Marc D. Pell. 2017. The sound of confidence and doubt. Speech Communication 881. 106–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Momtaz, Sara & Gavin M. Bidelman
2024. Effects of Stimulus Rate and Periodicity on Auditory Cortical Entrainment to Continuous Sounds. eneuro 11:3 ► pp. ENEURO.0027-23.2024 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue