Article published In: Culture – Language – Cognition
Edited by Marcelo Dascal †
[Pragmatics & Cognition 20:2] 2012
► pp. 295–316
Language: Between cognition, communication and culture
Published online: 18 February 2013
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.20.2.06reb
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.20.2.06reb
Everett’s main claim is that language is a “cultural tool”, created by hominids for communication and social cohesion. I examine the meaning of the expression “cultural tool” in terms of the influence of language on culture (i.e. the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis) or of the influence of culture on language (Everett’s hypothesis). I show that these hypotheses are not well-supported by evidence and that language and languages, rather than being “cultural tools” as wholes are rather collections of tools used in different language games, some cultural or social, some cognitive. I conclude that the coincidence between language and culture is due to the fact that both originate from human nature.
Cited by (7)
Cited by seven other publications
Horák, Miroslav, Michal Uhrin & Ana Paula Amaral
Martins, Mauricio Dias, Bruno Gingras, Estela Puig-Waldmueller & W. Tecumseh Fitch
Reboul, Anne
Everett, Daniel L.
Martins, Maurício de Jesus Dias, Zarja Muršič, Jinook Oh & W. Tecumseh Fitch
Martins, Maurício Dias, Sabine Laaha, Eva Maria Freiberger, Soonja Choi & W. Tecumseh Fitch
Chrisomalis, Stephen
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
