Cover not available

Review published In: Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 20:1 (2012) ► pp.222228

Get fulltext from our e-platform
References (10)
References
Amossy, R. 1999. “La notion d’éthos, de la rhétorique à l’analyse du discours”. In R. Amossy (ed), Images de soi dans le discours. La construction de l’éthos. Genève: Delachaux et Niestlé.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Arnauld, A. and Nicole, P. 1683. La logique ou l’art de penser. Critical edition by P. Clair and F. Girbal. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France [1965].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Caffi, C. and Janney, R. W. 1994. “Toward a pragmatics of emotive communication”. Journal of Pragmatics 211: 325–373. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamblin, C. L. 1970. Fallacies. London: Methuen.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. 1980. L’énonciation. De la subjectivité dans le langage. Paris: A. Colin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1845. A System of Logic. New York: Harper & Bros.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., and Foss, M. A. 1987. “The referential structure of the affective lexicon”. Cognitive Science 111: 341–364. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perelman, C. and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. 1969. The New Rhetoric. A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame, IL: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plantin, C., Doury, M., and Traverso, V. (eds). 2000. Les émotions dans les interactions. Lyon: Presses Universitaires Lyon.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toulmin, S. 1958. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue