Discussion published In: Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 2:1 (1994) ► pp.167–190
Discussion
The constitutive rule of a round table
On (On) Searle on Conversation
Published online: 1 January 1994
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.2.1.07ame
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.2.1.07ame
'What is the dialogical way to episteme?' and 'What chances has a commentary to approach correctly this question? ' constitute the author's problems in presenting and discussing the collective volume (On) Searle on Conversation. The contributors — along with Searle and the author of this essay — are involved in a discussion about discussion, whose constitutive norms are examined. In order to reduce the 'staging' distance between the critical act and the object of criticism, some of the analyzed concepts are transformed into analytical instruments.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Amel, Rodica
2001. Review of Lafont & Medina (1999): The Linguistic Turn in Hermeneutic Philosophy. Pragmatics & Cognition 9:2 ► pp. 349 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
