Marcelo Dascal (ed.). The Practice of Reason. Leibniz and his Controversies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2010. xvi + 359 pp. ISBN 978 90 272 1887 2Hb 978 90 272 8867 7Eb

Reviewed by

Txetxu Ausin | Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Madrid

Published online: 26 July 2011

https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.19.1.10aus

References (4)

References

Ausín, T. 2005a. “Weighing and gradualism in Leibniz as instruments for the analysis of normative conflicts”. Studia Leibnitiana 37(1): 99–111.

2005b. Entre la lógica y el derecho. Paradojas y conflictos normativos. México/Madrid: Plaza y Valdés.

Dascal, M. 2001. “Nihil sine ratione → Blandior ratio”. In H. Poser (ed), Nihil sine ratione. Proceedings of the VII Internationaler Leibniz-Kongress. Berlin: Leibniz Gesellschaft, 276–280.

Ranea, A. G. 1989. “The a priori method and the actio concept revised. Dynamics and metaphysics in an unpublished controversy between Leibniz and Denis Papin”. Studia Leibnitiana 20(1): 42–68.

Marcelo Dascal (ed.). The Practice of Reason. Leibniz and his Controversies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2010. xvi + 359 pp. ISBN 978 90 272 1887 2Hb 978 90 272 8867 7Eb

Marcelo Dascal (ed.). The Practice of Reason. Leibniz and his Controversies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2010. xvi + 359 pp. ISBN 978 90 272 1887 2Hb 978 90 272 8867 7Eb