Cover not available

Article published In: The Dynamics of Lexical Innovation: Data, methods, models
Edited by Daphné Kerremans, Jelena Prokić, Quirin Würschinger and Hans-Jörg Schmid
[Pragmatics & Cognition 25:1] 2018
► pp. 122–141

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Metalinguistic comments and signals

What can they tell us about the conventionalization of neologies?

 | Stockholm University
Published online: 12 June 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.18005.sva
Abstract
Many neologies receive a large amount of metalinguistic focus during their conventionalization. This includes explicit metalinguistic comments, as well as several ways of emphasizing a new word qua word in running texts, so-called metasignals (e.g., quotation marks). This article reports from a large quantitative study of 360 Swedish neologies. It investigates the nature and the amount of metafocus during conventionalization. More than 96% of the neologies received metafocus at least once, but the mean proportion of metafocused citations was low, just under 3.5%. Metafocusing is likely to be more intense in early phases and is likely to decline over time. No long-term effects of metafocusing on the conventionalization process itself were found in corpus data.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Metacomments and metasignals
  • 3.Data
  • 4.Patterns of metafocusing
  • 5.Decline over time
  • 6.How does metafocusing affect conventionalization?
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (19)
References
Baayen, R. Harald. 2009. Corpus linguistics in morphology: Morphological productivity. In Anke Lüdeling & Merja Kytö (eds.), Corpus linguistics: An international handbook, 900–919. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bauer, Laurie. 1983. English word-formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. Morphological productivity (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 95). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Setting limits on creativity in the production and use of metaphorical and metonymical compounds. In Sascha Michel & Alexander Onysko (eds.), Cognitive approaches to word formation, 221–245. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berry, Roger. 2005. Making the most of metalanguage. Language Awareness 14(1). 3–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bower, Jack & Satomi Kawaguchi. 2011. Negotiation of meaning and corrective feedback in Japanese/English eTandem. Language Learning & Technology 15(1). 41–71.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. 1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form (Typological Studies in Language 9). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Roswitha. 1998. Lexical change in present-day English: A corpus-based study of the motivation, institutionalization, and productivity of creative neologisms. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kerremans, Daphné. 2015. A web of new words: A corpus-based study of the conventionalization process of English neologisms. Frankfurt am Main etc.: Peter Lang. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Metcalf, Allan. 2002. Predicting new words. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Morzycki, Marcin. 2011. Metalinguistic comparison in an alternative semantics for imprecision. Natural Language Semantics 191. 39–86. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Predelli, Stefano. 2003. Scare quotes and their relation to other semantic issues. Linguistics and Philosophy 261. 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2008. New words in the mind: Concept-formation and entrenchment of neologisms. Anglia 126 (1). 1–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. English morphology and word-formation: An introduction. 3rd edn. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Semino, Elena. 2016. A corpus-based study of ‘mixed metaphor’ as a metalinguistic comment. In Raymond W. Gibbs Jr. (ed.), Mixing metaphor (Metaphor in Language, Cognition, and Communication 6), 203–220. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Svanlund, Jan. 2006. Hur man etablerar sig som curlingförälder och stafettläkare . Svenskans beskrivning 281. Örebro universitet. 359–368.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Lexikal etablering: En korpusundersökning av hur nya sammansättningar konventionaliseras och får sin betydelse (Stockholm Studies in Scandinavian Philology, n.s., 52). Vällingby: Elanders.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Yusra, Kamaludin & Yuni Budi Lestari
2025. Translingualism and solidarity in multiethnic communities. International Journal of Multilingualism ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Becker, Israela
2024. Let my speakers talk: metalinguistic activity can indicate semantic change. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 20:2 ► pp. 289 ff. DOI logo
Winter-Froemel, Esme
2023. Alterity marking and enhancing accessibility in lexical borrowing: meta-information techniques in the use of incipient anglicisms in French and Italian. Folia Linguistica 57:2 ► pp. 345 ff. DOI logo
Winter-Froemel, Esme
2023. Alterity marking and enhancing accessibility in lexical borrowing: meta-information techniques in the use of incipient anglicisms in French and Italian. Folia Linguistica 0:0 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue