Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 25:2 (2018) ► pp.384–416

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required

Beyond triadic communication

A three-dimensional conceptual space for modelling intersubjectivity

 | Leiden University, The Netherlands
 | Leiden University, The Netherlands
Published online: 25 November 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.18004.dui
Abstract
Coordinating different viewpoints is an essential part of human interaction. Languages have evolved conventional ways of supporting this process: many linguistic items are somehow involved in viewpoint management, ranging from morphological elements and lexical units to grammatical constructions and narrative patterns. In this paper we propose a conceptual model for analysing how particular instances (or combinations) of such linguistic items can be used to coordinate the viewpoints of signallers, addressees, and third parties involved in an interaction event. In essence, our model augments Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Volume I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar “viewing arrangement” through the addition of a third dimension to the existing two. We discuss the details of our model using a range of examples from spoken discourse, newspaper articles, and literary fiction, and end by placing it in broader discussions on human social cognition.
Article outline
  • 1.Viewpoint management and intersubjectivity
  • 2.A three-dimensional conceptual space
    • 2.1Dyadic and triadic communication
    • 2.2Speaker commitment and viewpoint embedding: Dalabon and English
    • 2.3The general model
  • 3.Thoughtscapes and the 3D-model: Three case studies
    • 3.1Case 1: Murder or accident?
    • 3.2Case 2: Scope and framing in adjectives
    • 3.3Case 3: Perspective mixing: Free Indirect Discourse, and other forms
  • 4.Conclusion and discussion
    • 4.1Summary
    • 4.2The broader context: Intersubjective language and intersubjective thought
  • Notes
  • References
References (48)
References
Apperly, Ian. 2011. Mindreaders: The cognitive basis for theory of mind. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. The dialogic imagination. Edited by Michael Holquist, translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin/London: Texas University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bal, Mieke. 1985. Narratology: Introduction to the theory of narrative. Toronto: Toronto University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berger, Peter L. & Thomas Luckmann. 1966. The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara. 2012. The language of stories: A cognitive approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dancygier, Barbara, Wei-lun Lu & Arie Verhagen (eds.). 2016. Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities. (Cognitive Linguistics Research [CLR] 55). Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dennett, Daniel C. 1987. The intentional stance. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 1985. Competing motivations. In John Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in syntax, 343–365. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003. Discourse and grammar. In Michael Tomasello (ed.), The new psychology of language: Cognitive and functional approaches to language structure, vol. 21. 47–87. London: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2007. The stance triangle. In Robert Englebretson (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse: Subjectivity, evaluation, interaction, 139–182. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Duijn, Max J. van. 2016. The lazy mindreader: A humanities perspective on mindreading and multiple-order intentionality. PhD Thesis, Leiden University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Readers’ mindreading challenges, and how they can inform cognitive science. Review of General Psychology 22(2). 188–198. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas. 2010. Dying words: Endangered languages and what they have to tell us. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1994. Mental Spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fludernik, Monika. 1993. The fiction of language and the languages of fiction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Genette, Gérard. 1980. Narrative discourse: An essay in method. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heyes, Cecilia. 2018. Cognitive gadgets: The cultural evolution of thinking. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hühn, Peter, Wolf Schmid & Jörg Schönert (eds.). 2009. Point of view, perspective, and focalization: Modeling mediation in narrative. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hutchinson, Tom. 1988. Speech presentations in fiction with reference to The Tiger Moth by H. E. Bates. In Michael H. Short (ed.), Reading, analysing and teaching literature, 120–145. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Volume I: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Volume II: Descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2014. Subordination in a dynamic account of grammar. In Laura Visapää, Jyrki Kalliokoski, Helena Sorva (eds.). Contexts of subordination: Cognitive, typological and discourse perspectives , 17–72. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey & Mick Short. 2007 [1981]. Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose. 2nd edn. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McElreath, Richard & Joseph Henrich. 2007. Dual inheritance theory: The evolution of human cultural capacities and cultural evolution. In Robin Dunbar & Louise Barrett (eds.), Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McGregor, William B. 1997. Semiotic grammar. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milligan, Karen, Janet Wilde Astington & Lisa Ain Dack. 2007. Language and theory of mind: Meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. Child Development 78(2). 622–646. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nikiforidou, Kiki. 2010. Viewpoint and construction grammar: The case of past+now . Language and Literature 19(3). 265–284. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Owings, Donald H. & Eugene S. Morton. 1998. Animal vocal communication: A new approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanders, Ted, José Sanders & Eve Sweetser. 2009. Causality, cognition and communication: A mental space analysis of subjectivity in causal connectives. In Ted Sanders & Eve Sweetser (eds.), Causal categories in discourse and cognition, 19–59. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Seyfarth, Robert M., Dorothy L. Cheney & Peter Marler. 1980. Vervet monkey alarm calls: Semantic communication in a free-ranging primate. Animal Behaviour 28(4). 1070–1094. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2008. Origins of human communication. Boston: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. A natural history of human thinking. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vandelanotte, Lieven. 2002. Prenominal adjectives in English: Structures and ordering. Folia Linguistica XXXVI 3–4. 219–259.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. Deixis and grounding in speech and thought representation. Journal of Pragmatics 36(3). 489–520.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Mister so-called X: Discourse functions and subjectification of so-called . In Christopher S. Butler, Raquel Hidalgo Downing & Julia Lavid (eds.), Functional perspectives on grammar and discourse: In honour of Angela Downing, 359–394. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Speech and thought representation in English: A cognitive-functional approach. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Wait till you got started”. How to submerge another’s discourse in your own. In Barbara Dancygier & Eve Sweetser (eds.), Viewpoint in language: A multimodal perspective, 198–218. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verhagen, Arie. 2000. “The girl that promised to become something”: An exploration into diachronic subjectification in Dutch. In Thomas F. Shannon & Johan P. Snapper (eds.). The Berkeley Conference on Dutch Linguistics 1997: The Dutch Language at the Millennium, 197–208. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Constructions of intersubjectivity: Discourse, syntax, and cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008a. Intersubjectivity and explanation in linguistics – A reply to Hinzen and Van Lambalgen. Cognitive Linguistics 19(1). 125–143. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008b. Intersubjectivity and the architecture of the language system. In Jordan Zlatev, Timothy P. Racine, Chris Sinha & Esa Itkonen (eds.), The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity, 307–331. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wellman, Henry M. 2014. Making minds: How theory of mind develops. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Westh, Cecil. 1980. H. E. Bates: The song of the wren, the dam, the tiger moth, Oh! Sweeter than the berry. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilkins, David. 1986. Particle/clitics for criticism and complaint in Mparntwe Arrernte (Aranda). Journal of Pragmatics 10(5). 575–596. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Kefalidou, Sophia
2025. Irony, intersubjectivity and construal. In What makes a Figure [Figurative Thought and Language, 19], ► pp. 271 ff. DOI logo
Verhagen, Arie
2023. The origins of perspective taking lie in iconic language use: Unifying theories of signs, conversation, and narrative perspective. Frontiers in Communication 8 DOI logo
Zeman, Sonja
2019. The emergence of viewpoints in multiple perspective constructions. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 226 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue