Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 24:3 (2017) ► pp.441–473

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Spectrums of thought in gesture

Using gestures to analyze concepts in philosophy

 | University of Nottingham Ningbo China
 | City University of Hong Kong
Published online: 28 February 2019
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.17024.ste
Abstract
This study examines the form and function of gestural depictions that develop over extended stretches of concept explanation by a philosopher. Building on . 2009. Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar explorations of depiction by gesture, we examine how this speaker’s process of exposition involves sequences of multimodal, analogical depiction by which the philosophical concepts are not only expressed through gesture forms, but also dynamically analyzed and construed through gestural activity. Drawing on perspectives of gesture as active meaning making (. 2014. Gestural modes of representation as techniques of depiction. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki & Ellen Fricke (eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, vol. 21, 1687–1702. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar, . 2016. From mimesis to meaning: A systematics of gestural mimesis for concrete and abstract referential gestures. In Jordan Zlatev, Göran Sonesson & Piotr Konderak (eds.), Meaning, mind, and communication: Explorations in cognitive semiotics, 212–226. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar, . 2009. Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar), we argue that the build-up of gestures in depiction sequences, activated through a multimodal metaphor (Müller, Cornelia & Alan Cienki. 2009. Words, gestures, and beyond: Forms of multimodal metaphor in the use of spoken language. In Charles J. Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.), Multimodal metaphor, 299–328. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar), engages the wider philosophical standpoint of the speaker. Using video analysis supported by interview data, we demonstrate how examination of gestures within and across discourse can lead to understanding of how dynamic, embodied, and subjective processes of conceptualization contribute to philosophical theorizing.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
  • 3.How do gestures depict and analyze content in spoken discourse?
  • 4.Methods and procedures
  • 5.Analysis
    • 5.1Depiction in the explanation of the concept cinematicity
      • 5.1.1Papal canopy description and depiction
      • 5.1.2Establishment of virtual canopy space and carved stone images
      • 5.1.3Bulging sculpture on the canopy columns depicting pregnancy
      • 5.1.4Illustration of birth as represented in the sculpture
    • 5.2Depiction in the explanation of the concept chimerica
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Note
  • References
References (48)
References
Bressem, Jana & Silvia H. Ladewig. 2011. Rethinking gesture phases: Articulatory features of gestural movement? Semiotica 1841. 53–91.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bressem, Jana, Silva H. Ladewig & Cornelia Müller. 2013. Linguistic annotation system for gestures (LASG). In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva Ladewig, David McNeill & Sedinha Tessendorf (eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, vol. 11, 1098–1125. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Calbris, Geneviève. 1990. The semiotics of French gestures. Bloomington, IN: University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. Elements of meaning in gesture. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cameron, Lynne. 2003. Metaphor in educational discourse. London/ New York: Continuum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cassell, Justine & David McNeill. 1991. Gesture and the poetics of prose. Poetics Today 12(3). 375–404. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cienki, Alan & Cornelia Müller. 2008. Metaphor, gesture, and thought. In Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr. (ed.). The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, 483–501. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 2016. Depicting as a method of communication. Psychological Review 123(3). 324–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cooperrider, Kensy & Susan Goldin-Meadow. 2017. When gesture becomes analogy. Topics in Cognitive Science 9(3). 719–737. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dingemanse, Mark. 2012. Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Linguistics and Language Compass 6(10). 654–672. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enfield, Nick J. 2009. The anatomy of meaning: Speech, gesture, and composite utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harrison, Simon. 2018. The impulse to gesture: Where language, minds, and bodies intersect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hutchins, Edwin & Leysia Palen. 1997. Constructing meaning from space, gesture, and speech. In Lauren B. Resnick, Roger Säljö, Clotilde Pontecorvo & Barbara Burge (eds.), Discourse, tools and reasoning, 23–40. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jensen, Thomas Wiben & Elena Cuffari. 2014. Doubleness in experience: Toward a distributed enactive approach to metaphoricity. Metaphor and Symbol 29(4). 278–297. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kendon, Adam. 2004. Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kita, Sotaro. 2000. How representational gestures help speaking. In David McNeill (ed.), Language and gesture, 162–185. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kita, Sotaro, Martha W. Alibali & Mingyuan Chu. 2017. How do gestures influence thinking and speaking? The Gesture-for-Conceptualization Hypothesis. Psychological Review 124(3). 245–266. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kok, Kasper I. & Alan Cienki. 2016. Cognitive Grammar and gesture: Points of convergence, advances and challenges. Cognitive Linguistics 27(1). 67–100. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites, vol. 11. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001. Dynamicity in grammar. Axiomathes 121. 7–33. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lascarides, Alex & Matthew Stone. 2009. A formal semantic analysis of gesture. Journal of Semantics 26(4). 393–449. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lausberg, Hedda & Han Sloetjes. 2009. Coding gestural behavior with the NEUROGES-ELAN system. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers 41(3). 841–849. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNeill, David. 1992. Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Gesture and thought. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNeill, David & Susan D. Duncan. 2000. Growth points in thinking-for-speaking. In David McNeill (ed.), Language and gesture, 141–161. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mittelberg, Irene. 2006. Metaphor and metonymy in language and gesture: Discourse evidence for multimodal models of grammar. Doctoral Dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mittelberg, Irene & Vito Evola. 2014. Iconic and representational gestures. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki & Ellen Fricke (eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, vol. 21, 1731–1746. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mittelberg, Irene & Linda R. Waugh. 2014. Gestures and metonymy. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki & Ellen Fricke (eds.) Body – language – communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, vol. 21, 1747–1766. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montredon, Jacques, Abderrahim Amrani, Marie-Paule Benoit-Barnet, Emmanuelle Chan You, Régine Llorca & Nancy Peuteuil. 2008. Catchment, growth point, and spatial metaphor: Analyzing Derrida’s oral discourse on deconstruction. In Alan Cienki & Cornelia Müller (eds.), Metaphor and gesture, 171–194. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, Cornelia. 1998. Redebegleitende Gesten: Kulturgeschichte – Theorie – Sprachvergleich. Berlin: Berlin Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Metaphors dead and alive, sleeping and waking: A dynamic view. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Gestural modes of representation as techniques of depiction. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki & Ellen Fricke (eds.), Body – language – communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, vol. 21, 1687–1702. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. From mimesis to meaning: A systematics of gestural mimesis for concrete and abstract referential gestures. In Jordan Zlatev, Göran Sonesson & Piotr Konderak (eds.), Meaning, mind, and communication: Explorations in cognitive semiotics, 212–226. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, Cornelia & Alan Cienki. 2009. Words, gestures, and beyond: Forms of multimodal metaphor in the use of spoken language. In Charles J. Forceville & Eduardo Urios-Aparisi (eds.), Multimodal metaphor, 299–328. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, Cornelia & Silva H. Ladewig. 2013. Metaphors for sensorimotor experiences: Gestures as embodied and dynamic conceptualizations of balance in dance lessons. In Mike Borkent, Barbara Dancyger & Jennifer Hinnell (eds.), Language and the creative mind, 295–324. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Núñez, Rafael E. 2006. Do real numbers really move? Language, thought, and gesture: The embodied cognitive foundations of mathematics. In Reuben Hersh (ed.), Unconventional essays on the nature of mathematics, 160–181. New York: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Núñez, Rafael. 2008. A fresh look at the foundations of mathematics. In Alan J. Cienki & Cornelia Müller. Metaphor and gesture, 93–114. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rieser, Hannes. 2009. On factoring out a gesture typology from the Bielefeld Speech-and-Gesture-Alignment Corpus (SAGA). In Stefan Kopp & Ipke Wachsmuth (eds.), Gesture in embodied communication and human-computer interaction. 8th International Gesture Workshop, GW 2009, 47–60. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiter, Jan Peter De. 2000. The production of gesture and speech. In David McNeill (ed.), Language and gesture, 284–311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selting, Margret, Peter Auer, Dagmar Barth-Weingarten, Jörg Bergmann, Pia Bergmann, Karin Birkner, Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen, Christian Meyer, Frank Oberzaucher, Susanne Uhmann. 2011. A system for transcribing talk-in-interaction: Gat 2. Gesprächsforschung 121. 1–51. [URL] (25 August, 2016)
Sonesson, Göran. 2016. The phenomenological semiotics of iconicity and pictoriality – Including some replies to my critics. Language and Semiotic Studies 21. 1–73.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Streeck, Jürgen. 2008. Depicting by gesture. Gesture 8(3). 285–301. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. Gesturecraft: The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tversky, Barbara & Angela Kessell. 2014. Thinking in action. Pragmatics & Cognition 22(2). 206–223. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Dyrmo, Tomasz
2024. Image schemas in gestural metaphorical scenarios of swearing. Multimodal Communication 13:2 ► pp. 117 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue