Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 24:1 (2017) ► pp.91–118

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required

Do the meanings of abstract nouns correlate with the meanings of their complementation patterns?

A case study on English commissive shell nouns

 | University of Perugia, Italy
 | LMU Munich, Germany
Published online: 19 January 2018
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.17003.ver
Abstract
There is a widespread assumption in Construction Grammar (but also before and elsewhere) that the meanings of verbs correlate with or even determine their complementation forms and patterns. There is much less research on noun complementation, however, although this category is even more interesting for a number of reasons such as the potential for valency reduction, nominal topicalization constructions, and additional complementation options, e.g. of-PPs and existential constructions.
In this paper we focus on the class of nouns reporting commissive illocutionary acts (promise, offer, pledge, refusal, bet, threat, etc.), and address the question of whether there is a correlation (i) between the meaning of these nouns and their preferred complementation patterns, and (ii) between their semantic similarity and their similarity in the distribution of complementation patterns.
We report the results of a study of a set of 17 commissive nouns chosen from a wider collection of illocutionary nouns. Two types of analysis were carried out in order to compare the semantic and grammatical characteristics of these nouns. The semantic analysis was based on insights from speech act theory and the philosophy of language. We developed a framework for a systematic comparative description of the nouns in our word field. The results were tallied with a corpus-based grammatical analysis. Two hundred tokens of each noun type were randomly sampled from the Corpus of Contemporary American English. Using these data, the 17 nouns were subjected to an analysis of the relative frequencies of their complementation patterns.
Results indicate a general match between noun meanings and complementation patterns. More specifically, however, they indicate that the closeness of this match depends on the prototypicality of nouns as members of the class of commissives.
The study, then, contributes to our understanding of the relation between lexis and syntax. At the same time, it confirms the need for a close semantic analysis to account for the great extent to which item-specific information, i.e. properties of individual nouns, have to be taken into consideration at the expense of large-scale generalizations.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical background
  • 3.Methodology
  • 4.Analysis and results
    • 4.1Semantic analysis
    • 4.2Grammatical analysis: Descriptive statistics
      • 4.2.1Uses in shell-noun function
      • 4.2.2Major patterns
      • 4.2.3Minor patters
    • 4.3Visualization of similarities in grammatical distribution
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Author contributions
  • Notes
  • References
References (52)
References
Ambroise, Bruno. 2013. Promising. In Marina Sbisà & Ken Turner (eds.), Pragmatics of speech action, 501–522. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bach, Kent & Robert Harnish. 1979. Linguistic communication and speech acts. Harvard: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bierwisch, Manfred. 1990. Event nominalizations: Proposals and problems. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 401. 19–84.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Castelfranchi, Cristiano & Marco Guerini. 2007. Is it a promise or a threat? Pragmatics & Cognition 15(2). 277–311. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conte, Maria-Elisabeth. 1996. Anaphoric encapsulation. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 101. 1–10. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William & D. Alan Cruse. 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2008. The Corpus of Contemporary American English: 450 Million Words, 1990–2012. Available from [URL]
Egan, Thomas. 2008. Non-finite complementation. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faulhaber, Susen. 2011a. Verb valency patterns: A challenge for semantics-based accounts. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011b. Idiosyncracy in verb valency patterns. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 59(4). 331–346. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flowerdew, John. 2003. Signalling nouns in discourse. English for Specific Purposes 22 (4). 329–346. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. Use of signaling nouns in a learner corpus. In John Flowerdew & Michaela Mahlberg (eds.), Lexical cohesion and corpus linguistics, 345–362. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flowerdew, John & Richard W. Forest. 2014. Signalling nouns in English: A corpus-based discourse approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt & Robert Jasperson. 1991. That-clauses and other complements. Lingua 831. 133–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Francis, Gil. 1986. Anaphoric nouns. Discourse Analysis Monographs 11, Birmingham: University of Birmingham Printig Section.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gaeta, Livio. 2002. Quando i verbi compaiono come nomi: Un saggio di Morfologia Naturale. Milano: FrancoAngeli.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Geeraerts, Dirk, Stefan Grondelaers & Peter Bakema. 1994. The structure of lexical variation: Meaning, naming, and context. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalizations in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, Mitchell. 2013. Assertions. In Marina Sbisà & Ken Turner (eds.), Pragmatics of speech action, 387–409. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herbst, Thomas. 2011. The status of generalizations: Valency and argument structure constructions. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 59(4). 347–367. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herbst, Thomas. 2014. The valency approach to argument structure constructions. In Thomas Herbst, Hans-Joerg Schmid & Susen Faulhaber (eds.), Constructions – collocations – patterns, 167–216. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1985. The iconicity of the universal categories ‘noun’ and ‘verb’. In John Haiman (ed.), Iconicity in syntax, 151–183. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ivanič, Roz. 1991. Nouns in search of context: A study of nouns with both open- and closed-system characteristics. International Review of Applied Linguistics and Language Teaching 21. 93–114.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1991. Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 2: Descriptive applications. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mair, Christian. 1990. Infinitival complement clauses in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martìnez Insua, Ana. 2004. Existential there-construction in contemporary British English. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Proost, Kristel. 2007. Conceptual structure in lexical items. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riddle, Elizabeth. 1975. Some pragmatic conditions on complementizer choice. In Papers from the Eleventh Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 467–474. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor & Carolyn B. Mervis. 1975. Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 81. 382–439. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 1998. Constant and ephemeral hypostatization: Thing, problem and other ‘shell nouns’. In Bernard Caron (ed.), Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Linguists, 20–25. Amsterdam/New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. English abstract nouns as conceptual shells. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Non-compositionality and emergent meaning of lexico-grammatical chunks: A corpus study of noun phrases with sentential complements as constructions. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik 55(3). 313–340. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. English morphology and word-formation: An introduction, 3rd. edn. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1976. A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society 5(1). 1–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1979. Expression and meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John & Daniel Vanderveken. 1985. Foundations of illocutionary logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taylor, John R. 2009. Linguistic categorization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ungerer, Friedrich & Hans-Jörg Schmid. 2006. An introduction to cognitive linguistics, 2nd edn. London: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vanderveken, Daniel. 1990. Meaning and speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vanparys, Johan. 1996. Categories and complements of illocutionary verbs in a cognitive perspective. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1968. Adjectives and nominalizations. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vergaro, Carla. 2015. Ways of asserting: English assertive nouns between linguistics and the philosophy of language. Journal of Pragmatics 841. 1–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1987. English speech act verbs: A semantic dictionary. Sydney: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1988. The semantics of grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre. 2000. Metarepresentation in linguistic communication. In Sperber, Dan (ed.), Metarepresentation: A multidisciplinary perspective, 411–448. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winter, Eugene. 1992. The notion of unspecific versus specific as a way of analyzing the information of a fund-raising letter. In William C. Mann & Sandra A. Thompson (eds.), Discourse descriptions: Diverse analyses of a fund-raising letter, 131–170. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Vergaro, Carla
2018. “And the Rabbi Begins the Benediction … ”: Declarative Shell Nouns in English. English Studies 99:8 ► pp. 817 ff. DOI logo
Vergaro, Carla
2023. Linguistic and pragmatic ways of committing oneself. Pragmatics & Cognition 30:1 ► pp. 120 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue