Article published In: Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 17:1 (2009) ► pp.146–175
Dimensions of evaluation
Cognitive and linguistic perspectives
Published online: 20 February 2009
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.17.1.05bed
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.17.1.05bed
In the past two decades or so, a number of researchers from various fields within linguistics have turned their attention to interpersonal phenomena, such as the linguistic expression of speaker opinion or evaluation (also called stance or appraisal), or the encoding of subjectivity in language and its diachronic development (subjectification/subjectivization). Many linguists have offered categorizations of evaluative meaning, based on authentic discourse data, but no connection has been made with cognitive approaches to appraisal processes. This paper offers a first meta-theoretical exploration of such issues. It compares dimensions of evaluation that have been identified in linguistic and cognitive studies, and also examines how psychological research into basic emotions can be related to linguistic research on affect. On the basis of these comparisons a proposal for a new classification of evaluative meanings is made. The focus of this paper is on only one aspect of the highly complex phenomenon of evaluation, namely potential evaluative dimensions, although other relevant issues will also be touched upon, including the pragmatics of evaluation (evaluation and context).
Keywords: affect, appraisal, basic emotions, cognition, emotion, evaluative meaning, evaluation, stance
Cited by (33)
Cited by 33 other publications
Goźdź-Roszkowski, Stanisław
Van Poucke, Margo
Alroumi, Abdulrahman & El Mustapha Lahlali
2023. The role of assessments in providing evasive answers in news interviews. Pragmatics and Society 14:6 ► pp. 883 ff.
Alroumi, Abdulrahman
Ding, Jiaolong & Guangwu Feng
Herman, Thierry & Diane Liberatore
Li, Ya-Ying, Fang-Hao Song, Yan Liu & Yong Wang
Vertommen, Bram
2022. The strategic value of pronominal choice. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 361 ff.
Vilar Lluch, Sara
2022. Redefining attitude for studying explicit and indirect evaluations of human behaviour. Functions of Language 29:2 ► pp. 199 ff.
Song, Jiannan
Song, Jiannan
Wei, Yipu, Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul, Ted M. Sanders & Willem M. Mak
Ковтун, О. В.
Breeze, Ruth
Kovtun, Oksana
Kovtun, Oksana
Kovtun, Oksana
Larina, Tatiana & Douglas Mark Ponton
Larina, Tatiana & Douglas Mark Ponton
Soler Gallego, Silvia
Benítez-Castro, Miguel-Ángel & Encarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio
2019. Chapter 12. Rethinking Martin & White’s affect taxonomy. In Emotion in Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 302], ► pp. 301 ff.
Damholdt, Malene Flensborg, Vestergaard Christina, Anna Kryvous, Catharina Vesterager Smedegaard & Johanna Seibt
DeCoursey, Christina A. & Aliaa N. Hamad
Schwarz-Friesel, Monika
Fuoli, Matteo & Christopher Hart
Alba-Juez, Laura
2016. The variables of the evaluative functional relationship. In Metapragmatics of Humor [IVITRA Research in Linguistics and Literature, 14], ► pp. 11 ff.
Giannoni, Davide Simone
Alba-Juez, Laura & Salvatore Attardo
2014. The evaluative palette of verbal irony. In Evaluation in Context [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 242], ► pp. 93 ff.
Alba-Juez, Laura & Geoff Thompson
2014. The many faces and phases of evaluation. In Evaluation in Context [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 242], ► pp. 3 ff.
Haupt, Jaromír
2014. Contrastive relations, evaluation, and generic structure in science news. In The Pragmatics of Discourse Coherence [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 254], ► pp. 53 ff.
DeCoursey, C.A.
Vertommen, Bram, Astrid Vandendaele & Ellen Van Praet
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
