Article published In: Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 16:3 (2008) ► pp.471–491
From predictions to promises
How to derive deontic commitment
Published online: 1 October 2008
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.16.3.03kis
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.16.3.03kis
This paper attempts to identify general, cross-cultural cognitive factors that trigger the default commissive interpretation of assertions about one’s future action. It is argued that the solution cannot be found at the level of the semantics of the English will, or any other future tense marker, but should be sought in the structure of rational intentions, as combined with the pragmatics of felicitous predictions and with parameters linked to the evolutionary advantage of cooperative behaviour. Some supporting evidence from language development studies is briefly presented.
Keywords: speech acts, cooperative behaviour, commitment, promise, futurity
Cited by (9)
Cited by nine other publications
Marx, Elena, Natalia Jardón & Eva Wittenberg
Cross, Ian
Rodríguez, Juan Luis
2022. The interplay of greetings and promises. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 167 ff.
Salgueiro, Antonio Blanco
2022. Promises, threats, and the foundations of speech act theory. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 213 ff.
Zhou, Yan
2020. The principle of proportionality. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 11:1 ► pp. 107 ff.
Vergaro, Carla & Hans-Jörg Schmid
2017. Do the meanings of abstract nouns correlate with the meanings of their complementation patterns?. Pragmatics & Cognition 24:1 ► pp. 91 ff.
MARI, ALDA
Mari, Alda
2018. The French future. In Evidence for Evidentiality [Human Cognitive Processing, 61], ► pp. 199 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
