Cover not available

Review published In: Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 16:1 (2008) ► pp.203–213

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
authorization required
Book review

Sol Azuelos-Atias. A Pragmatic Analysis of Legal Proofs of Criminal Intent. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2007. x + 180 pp. ISBN 978-90-272-2716-4

Reviewed by
 | Tel Aviv University
Published online: 7 April 2008
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.16.1.17hav
References (24)
References
Anscombre, J. -C. and Ducrot, O. 1989. “Argumentativity and informativity”. In M. Meyer (ed), From Metaphysics to Rhetoric. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 71–87. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barak, A. 1987. Judicial Discretion. Tel Aviv: Papirus (in Hebrew).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1992. Interpretation in Law: The General Theory. Jerusalem: Nevo Publishing Ltd. (in Hebrew).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1993. “Judicial philosophy and judicial activism”. Tel Aviv Law Review 171: 475–502.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003. Purposive Interpretation in Law. Jerusalem: Nevo Publishing Ltd. (in Hebrew).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004. The Judge in a Democracy. Haifa/Jerusalem/Srigim-Leon: Haifa University Press, Keter Publishing House, Nevo Publishing Ltd. (in Hebrew).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bertea, S. 2004. “Certainty, reasonableness and argumentation in law”. Argumentation 18(4): 465–478. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. 1977. Text and Context. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ducrot, O. 1972. Dire et ne pas dire. Principes de Sémantique Linguistique. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., and Kruiger, T. 1987. Handbook of Argumentation Theory: Pragmatic and Discourse Analysis. Amsterdam: Foris. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Genette, G. 1972. Figures III. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. 1975. “Logic and conversation.” In P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds), Syntax and Semantics III: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press: 41–58.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levy, Y. and Lederman, E. 1982. Principals of Criminal Responsibility. Tel Aviv: Ramot (in Hebrew).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lodder, A. R. 2004. “Law, logic, rhetoric: A procedural model of legal argumentation.” In S. Rahman and J. Symons (eds), Logic, Epistemology and the Unity of Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 569–588. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lotfipour-Saedi, K. 1990. “Discourse analysis and the problem of translation equivalence”. Meta 35(2): 389–397. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Orr, C. W. 1942. “The problem of translation”. Music & Letters 22(4): 318–332. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sallis, J. 2002. On Translation. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salmond, J. W. 1966. On Jurisprudence, 12th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Uspensky, B. 1973. A Poetics of Composition: The Structure of the Artistic Text and Typology of Compositional Forms. Transl. V. Zavarin and S. Wittig. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walton, D. N. 1990. “What is reasoning? What is an argument?”. The Journal of Philosophy 87(8): 399–419. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
White, J. B. 1990. Justice as Translation: An Essay in Cultural and Legal Criticism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zaltzman, N. 2001. “’Factual Truth’ and ‘Legal Truth’”. Tel Aviv Law Review 241: 263–273 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue