Cover not available

Article published In: Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 30:2 (2023) ► pp.330–352

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB

Levels of metaphor in gesture

 | Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań
Open Access logo
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

This article was made Open Access under a CC BY-NC 4.0 license through payment of an APC by or on behalf of the author.

Published online: 11 July 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.00033.dyr
Abstract
The present contribution integrates a recent, multilevel approach to metaphor advanced by Kövecses (. 2017. Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics 281. 321–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar and later publications), with gestures as a mode of metaphorical expression. In doing so, the paper shows how different elements of conceptual structure, varying from the abstract, recurring image schema, through more complex conceptual domains and frames, to contextually embedded and variable metaphorical scenarios, participate in the metaphoricity of gestures. This application of gestures to the multilevel approach lends direct support to the idea that human conceptual system recruits various semiotic modes – not limited to language – for expressing its content. Image schemas of object and source-path-goal have been shown to participate directly in the domain of transfer, which, when embedded in context of a given communicative situation, has become the conceptual frame of coming out. The frame, when realised via different gestural forms in a shared context across many speakers, turns into a highly context-sensitive, variable, and speech co-expressive gestural metaphorical scenario of coming out is showing an object.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Levels of schematicity
    • 2.1Image schemas
    • 2.2Domains
    • 2.3Frames
    • 2.4Scenarios
  • 3.Data
  • 4.Levels of metaphor in gesture
    • 4.1Image schema
    • 4.2Domains
    • 4.3Frames
    • 4.4Scenarios
  • 5.Discussion and conclusions
  • Note
  • Bibliography
References (78)
Bibliography
Abdel-Raheem, Ahmed. 2023. What’s really in a frame? The case of public marriage proposals. Discourse Studies 25(2). 273–287. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bavelas, Janet. 1994. Gestures as part of speech: Methodological implications. Research on Language & Social Interaction 27(3). 201–221. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bressem, Jana. 2021. Repetitions in gesture: A cognitive-linguistic and usage-based perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Michael P. 2000. Closet space: Geographies of metaphor from the body to the globe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2005. Politicians and rhetoric: The persuasive power of metaphor. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Metaphors of Brexit: No cherries on the cake? New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. Metaphors we come out by: how structural metaphors construct coming out in internet advice texts. Gender and Language 14(1). 8–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chui, Kawaii. 2012. Gestural manifestation of knowledge in conceptual frames. Discourse Processes 49(8). 599–621. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cienki, Alan. 2017. Utterance Construction Grammar (UCxG) and the variable multimodality of constructions. Linguistics Vanguard 3(s1). 20160048. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2005. Image schemas and gesture. In Beate Hampe & Joseph. E. Grady (eds.), From perception to meaning, 421–442. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. Why study metaphor and gesture? In Alan Cienki & Cornelia Müller (eds.), Metaphor and gesture, 5–25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clausner, Timothy C. & William Croft. 1999. Domains and image schemas. Cognitive Linguistics 10(1). 1–31. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William & Alan D. Cruse. 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Debreslioska, Sandra & Marianne Gullberg. 2020. The semantic content of gestures varies with definiteness, information status and clause structure. Journal of Pragmatics 1681. 36–52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dyrmo, Tomasz. 2022a. A multilevel cognitive model of coming out. Prace Językoznawcze 24(4). 27–43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022b. Gestural metaphorical scenarios and coming out narratives. Metaphor and the Social World 12(1). 23–45. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2023. Metaphors of coming out in Polish: A cognitive linguistic approach. Topics in Linguistics 24(1). 94–107. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evans, Vyvyan. 2015. The crucible of language: How language and mind create meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Cognitive linguistics: A complete guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles. J. 1976. Frame semantics and the nature of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 2801. 20–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles. J. & Collin Baker. 2012. A frames approach to semantic analysis. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, 313–340. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gawne, Lauren. 2021. ‘Away’ gestures associated with negative expressions in narrative discourse in Syuba (Kagate, nepal) speakers. Semiotica 2021(239). 37–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gerwing, Jennifer & Janet Bavelas. 2004. Linguistic influences on gesture’s form. Gesture 4(2). 157–195. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond. W. 2008. Images schemas in conceptual development: What happened to the body? Philosophical Psychology 21(2). 231–239. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2021. Metaphors in the flesh: Metaphorical pantomimes in sports celebrations. Cognitive Linguistics 32(1). 67–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond. 2022. Metaphorical experience. Contiguity or cross-domain mappings? Review of Cognitive Linguistics 20(1). 7–32.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele. E. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2019. Explain me this: Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harrison, Simon. 2018. The impulse to gesture: Where language, minds, and bodies intersect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinnell, Jennifer. 2018. The multimodal marking of aspect: The case of five periphrastic auxiliary constructions in North American English. Cognitive Linguistics 29(4). 773–806. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Thomas. 2017. Multimodal constructs – multimodal constructions? The role of constructions in the working memory. Linguistics Vanguard 3(s1). 20160042. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Inbar, Anna & Yael Maschler. 2023. Shared knowledge as an account for disaffiliative moves: Hebrew ki ‘because’-clauses accompanied by the Palm-Up Open-Hand gesture. Research on Language and Social Interaction 52(2). 141–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Embodied mind, meaning, and reason: How our bodies give rise to understanding. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Levels of metaphor. Cognitive Linguistics 281. 321–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020a. An extended view of conceptual metaphor theory. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18(1). 112–130. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020b. Extended conceptual metaphor theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ladewig, Silva. H. 2011. Putting the cyclic gesture on a cognitive basis. CogniTextes 61. Available at [URL].
2014. 121. The cyclic gesture. In Cornelia Müller, Alan Cienki, Ellen Fricke, Silva Ladewig, David McNeill & Jana Bressem (eds.), Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft [Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science (HSK)], 1605–1618. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1996. Moral politics: What conservatives know that liberals don’t. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. The neural theory of metaphor. In Raymond W. Gibbs (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought, 17–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lovelock, Michael. 2017. ‘My coming out story’: Lesbian, gay and bisexual youth identities on YouTube. International Journal of Cultural Studies 22(1). 1–16.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Łozińska, Joanna. 2021. Imagery underlying metaphors: A cognitive study of a multimodal discourse of yoga classes. Metaphor & Symbol 36(3). 150–165. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Manning, Jammie. 2014. Communicating sexual identities: A typology of coming out. Sexuality & Culture 19(1). 122–138. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martinez de Leon, Celia & Alba Fernandez Santana. 2021. Embodied cognition in the booth: Referential and pragmatic gestures in simultaneous interpreting. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 8(2). 277–306. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Masi, Silvia. 2020. Exploring meaning-making practices via co-speech gestures in TED Talks. Journal of Visual Literacy 39(3–4). 201–219. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McNeill, David. 2005. Gesture and thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017b. Multimodal existential constructions in German: Manual actions of giving as experiential substrate for grammatical and gestural patterns. Linguistics Vanguard 3(s1). 20160047. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Peirce’s universal categories: On their potential for gesture theory and multimodal analysis. Semiotica 2019(228). 193–222. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mittelberg, Irene & Gina Joue. 2017. Source actions ground metaphor via metonymy: Toward a frame-based account of gestural action in multimodal discourse. In Beate Hampe (ed.), Metaphor, 119–137. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, Cornelia. 2017a. Waking metaphors: Embodied cognition in multimodal discourse. In B. Hampe (ed.), Metaphor, 297–316. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Musolff, Andreas. 2004. Metaphor and political discourse: Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. National conceptualisations of the body politic: Cultural experience and political imagination. Singapore: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reddy, Michael J. 1979. The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought, 284–310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schröder, Urlike. 2017. Multimodal metaphors as cognitive pivots for the construction of cultural otherness in talk. Intercultural Pragmatics 14(4). 493–524. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Complex image schemas. Półrocznik Językoznawczy Tertium. 4(1). 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022. Thematic roles in image schemas: A missing link between mind and language. Cognitive Semantics 8(1). 141–157. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Javier, Cristóbal Pagán Cánovas, Inés Olza & Daniel Alcaraz Carrión. 2020. Gesturing in the wild: Evidence for a flexible mental timeline. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 18(2). 289–315. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wehling, Elisabeth. 2009. Argument is Gesture War: Function, form and prosody of discourse structuring gestures in political argument. Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 35(2). 54–65. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. Discourse management gestures. Gesture 16(2). 245–276. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zlatev, Jordan. 2007. Intersubjectivity, mimetic schemas and the emergence of language. Intellectica. Revue de l’Association pour la Recherche Cognitive 46(2). 123–151. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Image schemas, mimetic schemas and children’s gestures. Cognitive Semiotics 7(1). 3–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Tseng, Ming-Yu
2025. “Then journeys are like life itself, rarely straight”: Towards a meta-metaphorical perspective on life–journey interactions. Journal of Pragmatics 247 ► pp. 152 ff. DOI logo
Dyrmo, Tomasz
2024. Figurativeness of the Japanese flag. Review of Cognitive Linguistics DOI logo
Dyrmo, Tomasz
2025. Secrets in motion. Narrative Inquiry DOI logo
Dyrmo, Tomasz
2025. Extending extended conceptual metaphor theory: rethinking levels, modalities, and meaning-making. Cognitive Semiotics 18:1 ► pp. 23 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue