Cover not available

Commentary published In: Pragmatics & Cognition
Vol. 30:1 (2023) ► pp.222–227

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
authorization required
Commentary

Non-standard uses of hybrid evaluatives and the echoic view

 | University of Warsaw
Published online: 9 November 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.00029.zem
References (9)
References
Anderson, Luvell. 2018. Calling, addressing, and appropriation. In David Sosa (ed.), Bad words, 6–28. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bianchi, Claudia. 2014. Slurs and appropriation: An echoic account. Journal of Pragmatics 661. 35–44. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cepollaro, Bianca. 2020. Slurs and thick terms: When language encodes values. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cepollaro, Bianca & Stojanovic, Isidora. 2016. Hybrid evaluatives. Grazer Philosophische Studien 93(3). 458–488. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jeshion, Robin. 2020. Pride and prejudiced: On the appropriation of slurs. Grazer Philosophische Studien 97(1). 106–137. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jusińska, Z. 2021. Slur reclamation – Polysemy, echo, or both? Organon F 28(3). 689–707. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Smitherman, G. 2006. Word from the mother: Language and African Americans. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre. 2006. The pragmatics of verbal irony: Echo or pretence? Lingua 1161. 1722–1743. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zeman, Dan. 2022. A rich-lexicon theory of slurs and their uses. Inquiry 65(7). 942–966. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue