Cover not available

Introduction published In: Discourse-pragmatic markers, fillers and filled pauses: Pragmatic, cognitive, multimodal and sociolinguistic perspectives
Edited by Kate Beeching, Grant Howie, Minna Kirjavainen and Anna Piasecki
[Pragmatics & Cognition 29:2] 2022
► pp. 181–194

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload EPUB
Introduction

Discourse-pragmatic markers, fillers and filled pauses

Pragmatic, cognitive, multimodal and sociolinguistic perspectives

 | University of the West of England
 | University of the West of England
 | University of the West of England
 | University of the West of England


This article is available free of charge.

Published online: 11 April 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.00025.bee
References (42)
References
. 2011. ‘Well I’m not sure I think…’. The use of well by non-native speakers. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 16(2). 231–54. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Understanding pragmatic markers. A variational pragmatic approach. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aijmer, Karin & Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen (eds.). 2006. Pragmatic markers in contrast. Oxford: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel. 1996. Pragmatic markers in English: Grammaticalization and discourse functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beeching, Kate. 2015. Variability in native and non-native use of pragmatic markers: The example of well in role-play data. In Kate Beeching & Helen Woodfield (eds.), Researching sociopragmatic variability. Perspectives from variational, interlanguage and contrastive pragmatics, 174–200. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beeching, Kate & Ulrich Detges (eds.). 2015. Discourse functions at the left and right periphery: Crosslinguistic investigations of language use and language change. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Butterworth, Brian. 1980. Evidence from pauses in speech. In Brian Butterworth (ed.), Language production (vol. 11), 155–176. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Buysse, Lieven. 2020. ‘It was a bit stressy as well actually’: The pragmatic markers actually and in fact in spoken learner English. Journal of Pragmatics 1561. 28–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert & Jean E. Fox Tree. 2002. Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition 841. 73–111. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cooper, William & Jeanne Paccia-Cooper. 1980. Syntax and speech. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corley, Martin & Oliver W. Stewart. 2008. Hesitation disfluencies in spontaneous speech: The meaning of um. Language and Linguistics Compass 2(4). 589–602. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Corley, Martin & Robert Hartsuiker. 2011. Why um helps auditory word recognition: The temporal delay hypothesis. PLos ONE 6(5): e19792. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Denke, Annika. 2009. Native-like performance: Pragmatic markers, repair and repetition in native and non-native English speech. Saarbrucken: VDM Verlag Dr Müller.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fischer, Kerstin (ed). 2006. Approaches to discourse particles. Oxford: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fung, Loretta & Ronald Carter. 2007. Discourse markers and spoken English: Native and learner use in pedagogic settings. Applied Linguistics 28(3). 410–39. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldman-Eisler, Frieda. 1961. Hesitation and information in speech. In Colin Cherry (ed.), Proceedings of the 4th London Symposium on Information Theory, 162–174. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1968. Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hasselgren, Angela. 1994. Lexical teddy bears and advanced learners: A study into the ways Norwegian students cope with English vocabulary. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 4(2). 1313–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Henderson, Alan, Frieda Goldman-Eisler & Andrew Skarbek. 1965. Temporal patterns of cognitive activity and breath control in speech. Language and Speech 81. 236–242. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1966. Sequential temporal patterns in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech 91. 207–216. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jehoul, Annelies, Geert Brône & Kurt Feyaerts. 2017. Gaze patterns and filled pauses: Empirical data on the difference between Dutch euh and euhm. In Proceedings of the 4th European and 7th Nordic Symposium on Multimodal Communication (MMSYM2016), 43–50.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kirjavainen, Minna, Ludivine Crible & Kate Beeching. 2022. Can filled pauses be represented as linguistic items? Investigating the effect of exposure on the perception and production of um. Language and Speech 65(2). 263–289. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lauwers, Peter, Gudrun Vanderbauwhede & Stijn Verleyen (eds.). 2012. Pragmatic markers and pragmaticalization: Lessons from false friends. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levelt, Willem J. M. 1983. Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition 141. 41–104. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1989. Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liao, Silvie. 2009. Variation in the use of discourse markers by Chinese teaching assistants in the US. Journal of Pragmatics 411. 1313–1328. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Merlo, Sandra & Plínio A. Barbosa. 2010. Hesitation phenomena: A dynamical perspective. Cognitive Processing 11(3). 251–261. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petrie, Helen. 1987. The psycholinguistics of speaking. In John Lyons, Richard Coates, Margaret Deuchar & Gerald Gazdar (eds.), New horizons in linguistics (vol. 21), 336–366. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pichler, Heike (ed.). 2016. Discourse-pragmatic variation and change in English: New methods and insights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speer, Shari R., Paul Warren & Amy J. Schafer. 2011. Situationally independent prosodic phrasing. Laboratory Phonology 2(1). 35–98. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Swerts, Marc. 1998. Filled pauses as markers of discourse structure. Journal of Pragmatics 30(4). 485–496. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tonetti Tübben, Ilenia & Daniela Landert. 2022. Uh and um as pragmatic markers in dialogues: A contrastive perspective on the functions of planners in fiction and conversation. Contrastive Pragmatics. 1–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tottie, Gunnel. 2019. From pause to word: Uh, um and er in written American English. English Language and Linguistics 23(1). 105–130. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zaides, Kristina Denisovna. 2022. Hesitative markers eto and eto samoe: Structural and temporal aspects. Коммуникативные исследования 9 (1). 49–66.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Koteyko, Nelya, Martine Van Driel, Sofia Billan, Belen Barros Pena & John Vines
2025. Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users. Autism in Adulthood 7:3 ► pp. 273 ff. DOI logo
Samniya, Hend, Shelley Taylor, Miho O. Tatsuki & Gail Tripp
2025. The Conversations of Children With ADHD: Structural and Pragmatic Language Use in Children With and Without ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders 29:10 ► pp. 864 ff. DOI logo
Beradze, Marianna & Natalia Meir
2024. Disfluencies as a Window into Pragmatic Skills in Russian-Hebrew Bilingual Autistic and Non-Autistic Children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue