Who is ‘us’ in Russian political discourse

Pyykkö, Riitta

doi:10.1075/pbns.98.14pyy

In:Us and Others: Social identities across languages, discourses and cultures
Edited by Anna Duszak †
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 98] 2002
► pp. 233–248

Get fulltext from our e-platform

Download Book PDF

Who is ‘us’ in Russian political discourse

Riitta Pyykkö

Published online: 8 August 2002

https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.98.14pyy

Cited by (17)

Cited by 17 other publications

Order by:

Fitzgerald, Chris & Martin Mullen

2024. ‘Each of us Is Responsible for all of us’: Solidarity and National Responsibility in Irish Leaders’ COVID Speeches. In The Nation in the Time of the Pandemic, ► pp. 67 ff.

Szczygłowska, Tatiana

2024. We have to ensure that… A contrastive corpus-based analysis of English situation manipulators and their Polish translation equivalents. Lingua 302 ► pp. 103702 ff.

Beauchamp, David & Sheena Gardner

2023. A trinocular view of the auxiliary verb will in COVID-19 briefings from Westminster and Holyrood. Language, Context and Text. The Social Semiotics Forum 5:1 ► pp. 124 ff.

UȚĂ BĂRBULESCU, OANA & MELANIA ROIBU

2023. Câteva observații despre... noi. Clusivitatea în limba română. Studii și cercetări lingvistice 2023:2 ► pp. 306 ff.

Ho, Victor

2022. Strategic use of nouns and pronouns in public discourse. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) ► pp. 51 ff.

Santulli, Francesca & Chiara Degano

2022. Agreement through Language. In Agreement in Argumentation [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 31], ► pp. 49 ff.

Formato, Federica

2019. Women in the Public Sphere: Gendered Language. In Gender, Discourse and Ideology in Italian, ► pp. 135 ff.

Kranert, Michael

2017. ‘Today I offer you, and we offer the country a new vision’: The strategic use of first person pronouns in party conference speeches of the Third Way. Discourse & Society 28:2 ► pp. 182 ff.

Riboni, Georgia

2015. Enhancing citizen engagement. In Participation in Public and Social Media Interactions [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 256], ► pp. 259 ff.

Bateman, Amanda

2014. Children’s use of English we in a primary school in Wales. In Constructing Collectivity [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 239], ► pp. 227 ff.

Dieltjens, Sylvain M. & Priscilla C. Heynderickx

2014. We is More Than You Plus I. The Interpretation of the We-Forms in Internal Business Communications. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 44:3 ► pp. 229 ff.

Fetzer, Anita

2014. “Judge us on what we do”. In Constructing Collectivity [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 239], ► pp. 331 ff.

Fetzer, Anita

2014. We and I, and you and them. In The Expression of Inequality in Interaction [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 248], ► pp. 213 ff.

Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula

2014. Replying with the freestanding ‘we’  in Greek conversations. In Constructing Collectivity [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 239], ► pp. 159 ff.

Pavlidou, Theodossia-Soula

2014. Constructing collectivity with ‘we’. In Constructing Collectivity [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 239], ► pp. 1 ff.

Rasmussen, Joel

2011. Enabling selves to conduct themselves safely: Safety committee discourse as governmentality in practice. Human Relations 64:3 ► pp. 459 ff.

Fetzer, Anita & Peter Bull

2008. ‘Well, I answer it by simply inviting you to look at the evidence’. Journal of Language and Politics 7:2 ► pp. 271 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.