2022. Les pronoms dans une perspective cognitive. Corela :HS-35
Debreslioska, Sandra & Marianne Gullberg
2020. What’s New? Gestures Accompany Inferable Rather Than Brand-New Referents in Discourse. Frontiers in Psychology 11
Blackwell, Sarah E.
2018. Frames of Reference and Antecedentless Anaphora in Spanish Conversation. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 47:2 ► pp. 283 ff.
Sax , Daniel J.
2018. Not quite ‘out of the blue’? Towards a dynamic, relevance-theoretic approach to thetic sentences in English . In Relevance Studies in Poland essays on language and communication. Volume 4,
Büring, Daniel
2016. Intonation and Meaning,
Nemoto, Naoko
2015. On the occurrences of anaphoric bare NPs in Japanese. Linguistics 53:5
2014. Les chaînes de référence dans un corpus de textes narratifs médiévaux : traits généraux et facteurs de variation. Langages N° 195:3 ► pp. 43 ff.
Bezuidenhout, Anne
2013. The (in)Significance of the Referential-Attributive Distinction. In Perspectives on Pragmatics and Philosophy [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 1], ► pp. 351 ff.
Gundel, Jeanette K., Nancy Hedberg & Ron Zacharski
2012. Underspecification of Cognitive Status in Reference Production: Some Empirical Predictions. Topics in Cognitive Science 4:2 ► pp. 249 ff.
Swierzbin, Bonnie
2010. Demonstratives’ Special Place in the English Reference System: Why that’s Important for English Language Learners. Language and Linguistics Compass 4:10 ► pp. 987 ff.
SERRATRICE, LUDOVICA
2005. The role of discourse pragmatics in the acquisition of subjects in Italian. Applied Psycholinguistics 26:3 ► pp. 437 ff.
Laury, Ritva
2001. Definiteness. In Handbook of Pragmatics, ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.
