In:Framing in Interaction: Pragmatic approaches to framing analysis
Edited by Simon Borchmann, Anne H. Fabricius and Ida Klitgård
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 354] 2025
► pp. 125–159
Chapter 5Framing the Danish Prime Minister as communist dictator during COVID-19
Published online: 30 October 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.354.05kli
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.354.05kli
Abstract
This article develops a pragmatic approach to framing analysis as it views framing in a wider communicative
context, and as it views satire as an example of framing. News framing and news satire have been widely debated in
communication studies, but rarely together. In this study, I suggest that framing and satire share a core structure of
ambiguity — a double vision — through subversive frame-shifting. This assumption is based on a scrutiny of the stylistic
construction of six satirical news articles in the Danish spoof website RokokoPosten which frame the Danish
Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen as a communist dictator during the COVID-19 crisis in 2020. I will demonstrate how, cognitively, the subversion of one established frame to another defamiliarised one
has the effect of raising the salience of conceptual connections which can lead to the creation of new connections of
meaning-making in the receivers. Satire as framing is an act of communicative co-creation.
Keywords: framing, satire, news satire, caricature, COVID-19, pandemic, humour, Denmark, Danish
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theory
- 2.1Framing: A plastic paradigm
- 2.2Previous studies on framing: Fixed or fluid framing
- 2.3Entman’s framing as a fractured a paradigm
- 3.Satire and framing
- 3.1News satire
- 3.2Previous studies of framing in satire
- 4.Method
- 4.1A framing analysis model
- 4.2Data
- 5.Analysis
- 5.1Agenda/frame building: The sender/communicator and the medium
- 5.2Agenda/frame setting
- 5.2.1The context
- 5.2.2The message/the text
- 5.2.3The language and style: Analysis
- 5.2.3.aArticle 1: 12 April, 2020: “Nordkorea: Mette Frederiksen gør det godt” [North Korea: Mette Frederiksen is doing a good job]
- 5.2.3.bArticle 2: 18 April, 2020: “Danmark tæt på kommunistisk idealsamfund” [Denmark close to being a communist utopia]
- 5.2.3.cArticle 3: 16 May, 2020: “Borgerlige meningsdannere indspiller protestsange mod regeringen” [Liberal opinion makers record protest songs against the government]
- 5.2.3.dArticle 4: 28 May, 2020:“Kim Jong-un dybt skuffet over socialdemokrater” [Kim Jong-un deeply disappointed with Social Democrats]
- 5.2.3.eArticle 5: 13 June, 2020: “Afsløring: Martin Rossen stod bag corona” [Disclosure: Martin Rossen concocted the coronavirus]
- 5.2.3.fArticle 6: 12 December, 2020: “Diktatorer til Mette Frederiksen: du er stadig en amatør” [Dictators to Mette Frederiksen: You are still an amateur]
- 5.3Framing effects: The receiver
- 6.Results and discussion
- 7.Conclusions and outlook
References
References (41)
Ardèvol-Abreu, Alberto. 2015. “Framing
Theory in Communication Research in Spain: Origins, Development, and Current
Situation.” Revista Latina de Comunicación
Social 70: 423–450.
Bartlett, Frederic C. 1932. Remembering: A Study in
Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bednarek, Monica A. 2005. “Frames Revisited: The
Coherence-Inducing Function of Frames.” Journal of
Pragmatics 37: 685–705.
Bennike, Christian. January 12, 2018. “Den
mest toneangivende satire i Danmark er blevet
borgerlig.” Information. [URL]
Berkowitz, Dan, and David Asa Schwartz. 2016. “Miley,
CNN, and The Onion.” Journalism
Practice 10 (1): 1–17.
Brix, Benedikte. 2017. “Marta
Sørensen er redaktør på sitet RokokoPosten, der skriver satirenyheder. Vi har mødt hende til en snak om humorgrænser,
LOL-idoler og at være sjovere end dig.” My Daily Space. [URL]
Dejean, Alex. 2016. “PC
Is Back in South Park: Framing Social Issues through
Satire.” Colloquy 12 (Fall): 101–114. [URL]
Drew, Paul, and John Heritage. 1992. ”Analyzing
Talk at Work: An Introduction. In Talk at Work: Interaction
in Institutional Settings, ed. by Paul Drew and John Heritage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Elliott, Robert C. 2019. “Satire.” Encyclopedia
Britannica. [URL]
Entman, Robert M. 1991. “Framing U.S. Coverage
of International News: Contrasts in the Narratives of the KAL and Iran Air
Incidents.” Journal of
Communication 41: 6–27.
1993. “Framing: Toward
Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of
Communication 43 (4): 51–58.
2003. “Cascading Activation:
Contesting the White House’s Frame after 9/11.” Political
Communication 20 (4): 415–32.
Ermida, Isabel. 2012. “News
Satire in the Press: Linguistic Construction of Humour in Spoof News
Articles.” In Language and Humour in the
Media, edited by Jan Chovanec and Isabel Ermida, 185–210. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Frederiksen, Mette. 2020. “Speeches.” The
Prime Minister’s Office. [URL]
Fulmer, Jeffrey E. 2009. “What in the World Is
Infrastructure?” PEI Infrastructure
Investor (July/August): 30–32.
Ghanem, Salma. 1997. “Filling
in the Tapestry: The Second Level of Agenda
Setting.” In Communication and Democracy: Explaining the
Intellectual Frontiers of Agenda-Setting Theory, edited by Maxwell E. McCombs, Donald L. Shaw, and David H. Weaver, 3–14. London: Routledge.
Hallahan, Kirk. 1999. “Seven
Models of Framing: Implications for Public Relations.” Journal of Public Relations
Research 11 (3): 205–42.
Klitgård, Ida. 2021. “‘Ignorance
Is Strength’: Representing COVID-19 Facebook Experts in Danish Textual News
Satire.” Journalistica 15 (1): 165–84.
Matousek, Mark. 2019. “Former
Tesla Employees Reveal What It’s Like to Work with Elon Musk.” Business
Insider. October 1. [URL]
McCombs, Maxell E., David E. Weaver and Donald L. Shaw. 1997. Communication
and Democracy: Exploring the intellectual Frontiers in Agenda-setting
Theory. London: Routledge.
Rehmeier, Randi. February 13, 2011. “Lokal
løgnecentral hitter på nettet.” Århus Stiftstidende. [URL]
Ritchie, L. David. 2005. “Frame-Shifting
in Humor and Irony.” Communication Faculty Publications and
Presentations. Paper 14. [URL].
RokokoPosten. 2014. “Breaking: Kim
Jong-un skifter til Socialdemokraterne.” February
4. [URL]
. 2020a. “Afsløring: Martin
Rossen stod bag corona.” June
13. [URL]
. 2020b. “Borgerlige
meningsdannere indspiller protestsange mod regeringen.” May 16. [URL]
. 2020c. “Danmark tæt på
kommunistisk idealsamfund.” April
18. [URL]
. 2020d. “Diktatorer til
Mette Frederiksen: Du er stadig en amatør.” December 12. [URL]
. 2020e. “Kim Jong-un dybt
skuffet over socialdemokrater.” May
28. [URL]
. 2020f. “Nordkorea: Mette
Frederiksen gør det godt.” April
12. [URL]
Rømer, Mikael. April 19, 2011. “Mette
Frederiksen: Det er ikke sjovt.” Ekstra Bladet. [URL]
Scheufele, Dietram A. 2000. “Agenda-Setting,
Priming, and Framing Revisited: Another Look at Cognitive Effects of Political
Communication.” Mass Communication &
Society 3 (2–3): 297–318.
Sheagley, Geoffrey, Paula L. O’Loughlin, and Timothy Lindberg. 2007. “New
Humor, Old School Style: A Content Analysis of the Political Cues Offered by The Onion on the 2000
and 2004 Elections.” In Laughing Matters: Humor and American
Politics in the Media Age, edited by Jody Baumgartner and Jonathan S. Morris, 81–96. Taylor & Francis Group.
Tannen, Deborah. 1979. “What’s
in a Frame? Surface Evidence for Underlying
Expectations.” In New Directions in Discourse
Processing, edited by Roy Freedle, 137–81. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Tænketanken Europa. “Tidslinje
over coronakrisen: Hvad skete der og hvornår?” [URL]
Wamsler, Lasse. 1 April, 2011. ”Rigtige
nyheder — med løg på”. Information, [URL]
