Cover not available

In:Semantic-Pragmatic Change from Intersubjective to Textual Meanings
Edited by Giulio Scivoletto and Ryo Takamura
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 353] 2025
► pp. 272285

References (48)
References
Aitchison, Jean. 2003. “Metaphors, Models and Language Change.” In Motives for Language Change, ed. by Raymond Hickey, 39–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barðdal, Jóhanna, Elena Smirnova, Lotte Sommerer, and Spike Gildea (eds). 2015. Diachronic Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinton, Laurel J. 2008. The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Campbell, Lyle (ed). 2001. “Grammaticalization: A Critical Assessment.” Language Sciences 23, Nos. 2–3.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coussé, Evie, Peter Andersson, and Joel Olofsson (eds). 2018. Grammaticalization Meets Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Merja Kytö. 2010. Early Modern English Dialogues: Spoken Interaction as Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Degand, Liesbeth, and Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul. 2015. “Grammaticalization or Pragmaticalization of Discourse Markers?Journal of Historical Pragmatics 16 (1): 59–85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Detges, Ulrich, and Richard Waltereit. 2011. “Turn-Taking as a Trigger for Language Change.” In Rahmen des Sprechens. Beiträge zu Valenztheorie, Varietätenlinguistik, Kreolistik, Kognitiver und Historischer Semantik [Frames of Speaking. Contributions to Valency Theory, Variation Studies, Creolistics, Cognitive and Historical Semantics], ed. by Sarah Dessì Schmid, Ulrich Detges, Paul Gévaudan, Wiltrud Mihatsch, and Richard Waltereit, 175–189. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dostie, Gaétane. 2004. Pragmaticalisation et marqueurs discursifs. Analyse sémantique et traitement lexicographique [Pragmaticalization and discourse markers. Semantic analysis and lexicographic treatment]. Brussels: De Boeck Supérieur. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ehmer, Oliver, and Malte Rosemeyer. 2018. “Inferences in Interaction and Language Change.” In Inferences in Interaction and Language Change, ed. by Oliver Ehmer, and Malte Rosemeyer. Special issue, Open Linguistics 4 (1): 1–20. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Erman, Britt, and Ulla-Britt Kotsinas. 1993. “Pragmaticalization: The Case of Ba’ and You Know.” Studier i Modernspråkvetenskap 10: 76–93. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 2006. “Towards a Theory of Discourse Markers.” In Approaches to Discourse Particles, ed. by Kirstin Fischer, 189–204. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Topic Orientation Markers.” Journal of Pragmatics 41 (5): 892–898. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gadanadis, Tim, and Derek Denis. 2023. “Uh, What Should We Count?” In Discourse-Pragmatic Variation and Change, ed. by Elizabeth Peterson, Turo Hiltunen, and Joseph Kern, 150–172. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ghesquière, Lobke. 2010. “On the Subjectification and Intersubjectification Paths Followed by the Adjectives of Completeness.” In Subjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, ed. by Kristin Davidse, Lieven Vandelanotte, and Hubert Cuyckens, 277–313. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 2003. “Constructions: A New Theoretical Approach to Language.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7: 219–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2013. “Constructionist Approaches.” In The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar, ed. by Thomas Hoffmann, and Graeme Trousdale, 15–31. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., and Ruqaia Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. 2012. “The Semantics of Pragmatic Expressions.” In Cognitive Pragmatics, ed. by Hans-Jörg Schmid, 589–613. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1999. “Why is Grammaticalization Irreversible?Linguistics 37 (6): 1043–1068. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi, and Friederike Hünnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd, Gunther Kaltenböck, Tania Kuteva, and Haiping Long. 2021. The Rise of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 2017. “Turn-initial Particles in English: The Cases of Oh and Well.” In Between Turn and Sequence: Turn-initial Particles Across Languages, ed. by John Heritage, and Marja-Leena Sorjonen, 155–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas. 1997. “The Discourse Marker Well in the History of English.” English Language and Linguistics 1 (1): 91–110. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Bernd Heine, and Tania Kuteva. 2011. “On Thetical Grammar.” Studies in Language 35 (4): 852–897. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kemmer, Suzanne, and Michael Barlow. 2000. “Introduction: A Usage-Based Conception of Language.” In Usage-Based Models of Language, ed. by Michael Barlow, and Suzanne Kemmer, vii–xxviii. Stanford, CA: CSLI publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 2003[1980]. Metaphors We Live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press, Second edition.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lass, Roger. 1997. Historical Linguistics and Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1982. Thoughts on Grammaticalization: A Programmatic Sketch, Vol. 1. The Cologne UNITYP project, University of Cologne.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015[1995]. Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Berlin: Language Science Press, Third rev. edition.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meillet, Antoine. 1958[1912]. “L’évolution des formes grammaticales. [The evolution of grammatical forms].” In Linguistique historique et linguistique générale [Historical and general linguistics]), 130–148. Paris: Champion.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Narrog, Heiko. 2014[2012]. “Beyond Intersubjectification: Textual Uses of Modality and Mood in Subordinate Clauses as Part of Speech-Act Orientation.” In Intersubjectivity and Intersubjectification in Grammar and Discourse, ed. by Lieselotte Brems, Lobke Ghesquière, and Freek Van de Velde, 29–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Norde, Muriel. 2009. Degrammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Onodera, Noriko O. 2011. “Grammaticalization of Discourse Markers.” In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, ed. by Heiko Narrog, and Bernd Heine, 614–624. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Petré, Peter. 2019. “How Constructions are Born. The Role of Patterns in the Constructionalization of be going to INF.” In Patterns in Language and Linguistics: New Perspectives on a Ubiquitous Concept, ed. by Beatrix Busse, and Ruth Möhlig-Falke, 157–192. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reddy, Michael J. (1993[1979]). “The Conduit Metaphor: A Case of Frame Conflict in our Language about Language.” In Metaphor and Thought, ed. by Andrew Ortony, 164–201. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Second edition.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand de. 1983[1916]. Course in General Linguistics. Translated by Roy Harris. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina. 2011. “The Pragmatic Variable: Toward a Procedural Interpretation.” Language in Society 40 (4): 343–372. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1982. “From Propositional to Textual and Expressive Meanings: Some Semantic-pragmatic Aspects of Grammaticalization.” In Perspectives on Historical Linguistics, ed. by Winfred P. Lehmann, and Yakov Malkiel, 245–271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “Grammaticalization.” In Continuum Companion to Historical Linguistics, ed. by Silvia Luraghi, and Vit Bubenik, 269–283. London: Continuum Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2024. “Rethinking the Relationship between Subjectification, Intersubjectification, and Textualization from a Constructionalist Perspective.” Cognitive Semantics 10 (1): 1–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, and Richard B. Dasher. 2002. Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs, and Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue