In:Semantic-Pragmatic Change from Intersubjective to Textual Meanings
Edited by Giulio Scivoletto and Ryo Takamura
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 353] 2025
► pp. 40–75
Chapter 2Pretend and actual speech events
Two manifestations of (inter)subjectivity in formulaic adverbials with speech event lexemes
Published online: 27 June 2025
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.353.02izu
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.353.02izu
Abstract
This study explores two different manifestations of speech event conception (actual and pretend
(inter)subjectivity), which brings some implications for studies of semantic change in the development of adverbials with
speech event lexemes (SELs). Based on the previous literature and some examples from Ainu, English, Japanese, Korean, and
Spanish, it first demonstrates that there are different dimensions of (inter)subjectivity. It further employs the re(de)fined
notions of (inter)subjectivity and presents a more in-depth analysis of the meaning and function of some Japanese and Ainu
adverbials with SELs. It finally shows that purported counterexamples to a “unidirectionality” hypothesis of semantic change
do not necessarily challenge the hypothesis.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Dimensions of subjectivity and intersubjectivity
- 2.1Basic characterizations
- 2.2Direct, indirect, and no mention of speaker and addressee
- 2.3Speech event pretend, actual, and less so
- 2.4Addressee speaking in SELAs
- 3.From an eclectic view to an integrating perspective
- 3.1Varying degrees of (inter)subjectivity
- 3.2Actual and pretend (inter)subjectivity
- 4.Development of SELAs
- 4.1Change from actual to pretend intersubjectivity
- 4.2Quotative marker for intersubjective and subjective anaphora
- 4.3SELAs with a formal noun for voice
- 5.(Inter)subjectification of SELAs
- 5.1Robust tendency of increased subjectivity
- 5.2Apparent counterexamples to unidirectionality hypothesis
- 6.Conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes References Dictionaries and corpus
References (48)
Batchelor, John. 1989. An
Ainu-English-Japanese Dictionary and
Grammar. Hakodate: Hokkaido Prefecture.
Benveniste, Emile. 1966. “De
la subjectivité dans le langage.” In Problèmes de
Linguistique
Générale, 258–266. Paris: Gallimard.
Berry, James Andrew. 2011. Diachronic
Adverbial Morphosyntax: A Minimalist Study of Lexicalization and
Grammaticalization. PhD dissertation, Arizona State University.
Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness:
Some Universals in Language
Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Carter, Ronald, and Michael McCarthy. 2006. Cambridge
Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, Billy. 1993. “Relevance
and ‘Pseudo-Imperatives’.” Linguistics and
Philosophy 16 (1): 79–121.
Culicover, Peter, and Ray Jackendoff. 1997. “Semantic
Subordination Despite Syntactic Coordination.” Linguistic
Inquiry 28: 195–218.
Diewald, Gabriele. 2013. “‘Same
Same but Different’: Modal Particles, Discourse Markers and the Art (and Purpose) of
Categorization.” In Discourse Markers and Modal Particles:
Categorization and Description, ed. by Liesbeth Degand, Bert Cornillie, and Paola Pietrandrea, 19–45. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fischer, Kerstin. 2007. “Grounding
and Common Ground: Modal Particles and Their Translation
Equivalents.” In Lexical Markers of Common
Grounds, ed. by Anita Fetzer and Kerstin Fischer, 47–66. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Fortuin, Egbert, and Ronny Boogaart. 2009. “Imperatives
as Conditional: From Constructional to Compositional Semantics.” Cognitive
Linguistics 20 (4): 641–673.
Halliday, M. A. K., and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. 2004. An
Introduction to Functional
Grammar. London: Hodder Arnold.
Kikuta, Chiharu Uda. 2018. “Development of
Conditional Imperatives in Japanese: A Diachronic Constructional Approach.” Cognitive
Linguistics 29 (2): 235–273.
Kinsui, Satoshi. 2011. “Teineigo
no gogen to hattatsu.” In Rekishiteki Goyoron Nyumon: Kako no
Komyunikeishon o Fukugensuru, ed. by Hiroyuki Takada, Michi Shiina, and Noriko Onodera, 163–173. Tokyo: Taishukan.
Koguma, Takeshi, and Katsunobu Izutsu. 2017. “Anchoring
Speaker: A Conceptual Account of a Copula Distinction in Tibetan with Related Phenomena in Japanese, English and
Mongolian.” Ningen
Bunka 42: 2–7.
Kubodeara, Itsuhiko. 1977. Ainu Jojishi Shinyo Seiden no Kenkyu [A study of Ainu epics,
god songs and sacred
tales]. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten.
Langacker, Ronald W. 1985. “Observations and
Speculations on Subjectivity.” In Iconicity in Syntax:
Proceedings of a Symposium on Iconicity in Syntax, Stanford, June
24–26, 1983, ed. by John Haiman, 109–150. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Mori, Junko. 1996. “Historical
Change of the Japanese Connective
Datte.” In Japanese/Korean
Linguistics 5, ed. by Noriko Akatsuka, Shoichi Iwasaki, and Susan Strauss, 201–217. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Nakagawa, Hiroshi. 2011. “Ainu no shinyo niokeru jojutsusya no ninsho [Persons
for narrators in Ainu god stories].” Hoppo Gengo
Kenkyu 1: 139–156.
Pascual, Esther. 2006. “Fictive
Interaction Within the Sentence: A Communicative Type of Fictivity in
Grammar.” Cognitive
Linguistics 17 (2): 245–267.
Pascual, Esther, and Sergeiy Sandler. eds. 2016. The
Conversation Frame: Forms and Functions of Fictive
Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A
Comprehensive Grammar of the English
Language. London: Longman.
Rhee, Seongha. 2014. “‘I
Know You Are Not, but If You Are Asking Me’: On Emergence of Discourse Markers of Topic Presentation from Hypothetical
Questions.” Journal of
Pragmatics 60: 1–16.
Scivoletto, Giulio. 2022. “Ripensare
l’intersoggettificazione tramite l’evoluzione dei marcatori del discorso in
siciliano.” Cuadernos de Filología
Italiana 29: 233–258.
Tamura, Suzuko. 1996. Ainugo Saru Hogen Jiten [An Ainu language dictionary of the
Saru
dialect]. Tokyo: Sofukan.
Tangiku, Itsuji. 2019. “Ainu
jokeishi kansho: Oinho ochushinni [Appreciation of Ainu epics: with central focus on
rhyming].” Ainu Senjumin Gengo Akaibu
Hokokusho 2018, 1–283. Hokkaido University.
Tantucci, Vittorio. 2017. “From
Immediate to Extended Intersubjectification: A Gradient Approach to Intersubjective Awareness and Semasiological
Change.” Language and
Cognition 9: 88–120.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1982. “From
Propositional to Textual and Expressive Meanings: Some Sematic-Pragmatic Aspects of
Grammaticalization.” Perspectives on Historical Linguistics, ed.
by Winfred P. Lehmann, and Yakov Malkiel, 245–271. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1988. “Pragmatic
Strengthening and Grammaticalization.” In Proceedings of the
Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (1988), ed.
by Shelley Axmaker, Annie Jaisser, and Helen Singmaster, 406–416.
. 1989. “On the Rise of
Epistemic Meanings in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic
Change.” Language 65: 31–55.
. 1995. “Subjectification in
Grammaticalization.” In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation in
Language, ed. by Dieter Stein, and Susan Wright, 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
. 2012. “Intersubjectification
and Clause Periphery.” English Text
Construction 5: 7–28.
SBC Santa Barbara Corpus of Spoken American
English, Part One and Two. Philadelphia PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.
