In:Influencer Discourse: Affective relations and identities
Edited by Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich and Alexandra Georgakopoulou
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 349] 2024
► pp. 278–301
Chapter 11“Getting personal with you”
Affect and authenticity in confessional videos of YouTube lifestyle and beauty influencers
Published online: 17 October 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.349.11dro
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.349.11dro
Abstract
Since the Middle Ages, confession has been one of the ‘most highly valued techniques for producing
truth’ (Foucault 1978). While confessional monologues have been researched
in reality TV discourse (Lorenzo-Dus 2009; Tolson 2006), the communicative potential of confessional talk for Social Media Influencers
has been largely underexplored. This chapter aims to fill this gap by exploring confession as a distinct genre in the
communicative repertoire of lifestyle and beauty YouTubers. In this regard, we first map this genre in terms of its
key themes, formal features and media production choices. Drawing on Giaxoglou’s
(2021) notion of affective positioning, we also examine how the influencers and their audiences are
affectively positioned in the discourse of confessional videos through the deployment of verbal, non-verbal, as well
as other material (camera) and graphic (emojis) resources. We conclude this chapter by demonstrating how this type of
positioning intersects with the production of an authentic selfhood on YouTube.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Confessional talk, emotion and authenticity
- 3.Collecting and analysing confessional videos
- 4.Confessional videos as a genre
- 5.Getting personal with you
- 5.1Conflicting characters: Vulnerable Amy vs. Exploitative Amy
- 5.2Affective tellers and supportive listeners
- 5.3Affective reactions from benevolent confessors
- 6.I’m burnt out
- 6.1Conflicting characters: Professional/Fake Amy vs. Personal/True Amy
- 6.2Affective/authentic tellers and intimate listeners
- 6.3Ventriloquising the confessor’s affective reactions
- 7.The affective self and “self authenticity”
- 8.Conclusion: Displaying affect in pursuit of authenticity
Notes References
References (51)
Abidin, Crystal. 2015. “Communicative
Intimacies: Influencers and Perceived Interconnectedness.” Ada: A Journal of
Gender, New Media & Technology, 8, [URL]
. 2017. “#Familygoals:
Family Influencers, Calibrated Amateurism, and Justifying Young Digital
Labor.” Social Media +
Society, 3(2).
Agar, Michael. 2006. “An
Ethnography by any Other Name.” Forum: Qualitative Social
Research, 7 (4): Art.
36.
Baker, Stephanie Alice, and Chris Rojek. 2020. “The
Belle Gibson Scandal: The Rise of Lifestyle Gurus as Micro-Celebrities in Low-Trust
Societies.” Journal of
Sociology 56 (3): 388–404.
Bakhtin, Mikhail Mikhailovich. 1981. “Discourse
in the Novel”. In The Dialogic Imagination: Four
Essays by M. M. Bakhtin ed. by Michael Holquist, 259–422. Austin: The University of Texas Press.
Bamberg, Michael. 1997. “Positioning
Between Structure and Performance.” Journal of Narrative and Life
History 71 (1–4): 335–342.
Barnes, Christine. 2022. “Precarious
Digital Mothering: Creativity, Entrepreneurship and Hidden Labor within Digital
Foodscapes.” Food, Culture & Society.
Batty, Craig. 2014. “Me
and You and Everyone We Know: The Centrality of Character in Understanding Media
Texts.” In Real Lives, Celebrity Stories: Narratives
of Ordinary and Extraordinary People Across Media ed. by Bronwen Thomas and Julia Round, 35–56. Bloomsbury.
Bauman, Richard. 2001. “The
Ethnography of Genre in a Mexican Market: Form, Function,
Variation.” In Style and Sociolinguistic
Variation ed. by Penelope Eckert & John R. Rickford, 57–77. Cambridge University Press.
Bednarek, Monika. 2013. “‘There’s
No Harm, Is There, in Letting Your Emotions Out’: A Multimodal Perspective on Language, Emotion and Identity
in MasterChef Australia.” In Real
Talk: Reality Television and Discourse Analysis in Action ed.
by Nuria Lorenzo-Dus and Pilar Garces-Conejos Blitvich, 88–114. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Bhatia, Aditi. 2018. “Interdiscursive
Performance in Digital Professions: The Case of YouTube Tutorials”. Journal of
Pragmatics 124, 106–120.
Busch, Brigitta. 2020. “Discourse,
Emotions and Embodiment.” In The Cambridge Handbook
of Discourse Studies, ed. by Anna De Fina and Alexandra Georgakopoulou, 327–349. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ceci, Laura. “Global
Youtube User Age & Gender Distribution
2024.” Statista, February 13, 2024. [URL]
De Fina, Anna. 2016. “Storytelling
and Audience Reactions in Social Media.” Language in
Society 45 (4): 473–498.
Dekavalla, Marina. 2022. “Facework
in Confessional Videos by YouTube Content
Creators.” Convergence 28 (3): 854–866.
Droz-dit-Busset, Olivia. 2022. “‘So-Called
Influencers’: Stancetaking and (De)Legitimation in Mediatized Discourse about Social Media
Influencers.” Discourse, Context &
Media 49: 100629.
. in
press. Disrupting the Economies of Language Work? Social Media Influencers as ‘New
Generation’
Copywriters. London: Routledge.
Duffy, Brooke Erin. 2017. (Not) Getting Paid
to Do What You Love: Gender, Social Media, and Aspirational Work. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Foucault, Michel. 1978. The
History of Sexuality Volume 1: An Introduction. New York: Vintage Books.
Friesen, Norm. 2017. “Confessional
Technologies the Self: From Seneca to Social Media.” First
Monday, 22(6).
Frobenius, Maximiliane. 2014. “Audience
Design in Monologues: How Vloggers Involve their Viewers.” Journal of
Pragmatics 72: 59–72.
Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. 2006. “Postscript:
Computer-Mediated Communication in Sociolinguistics.” Journal of
Sociolinguistics, 10 (4): 548–557.
Giaxoglou, Korina. 2021. A
Narrative Approach to Social Media Mourning: Small Stories and Affective
Positioning. New York: Routledge.
Giaxoglou, Korina, and Tereza Spilioti. 2020. The
shared story of #JeSuisAylan on Twitter: Story participation and stancetaking in visual small
stories. Pragmatics 30 (2): 277–302.
Grandey, Alicia, James Diefendorff, and Deborah E. Rupp, (eds.) 2013. Emotional
Labor in the 21st Century: Diverse Perspectives on Emotion Regulation at
Work. Routledge.
Grobe, Christopher. 2017. The
Art of Confession: The Performance of Self from Robert Lowell to Reality
TV. New York: New York University Press.
Hearn, Alison. 2011. “Confessions
of a Radical Eclectic: Reality Television, Self Branding, Social Media, and Autonomist
Marxism.” Journal of Communication
Inquiry 35 (4): 313–321.
Jeffries, Laura. (2011). “The
Revolution Will Be Soooo Cute: YouTube ‘Hauls’ and the Voice of Young Female
Consumers.” Studies in Popular
Culture 33 (2): 59–75.
Jerslev, Anne. 2016. “In
the Time of the Microcelebrity: Celebrification and the YouTuber
Zoella.” International Journal of
communication 10: 5233–5251.
Khamis, Susie, Ang, Lawrence & Welling, Raymond. 2017. “Self-Branding,
‘Micro Celebrity’ and the Rise of Social Media Influencers.” Celebrity
Studies 8 (2): 191–208.
Krzyżanowski, Michał. 2011. “Ethnography
and Critical Discourse Analysis: Towards a Problem-Oriented Research
Dialogue.” Critical Discourse
Studies 8 (4): 231–238.
Labov, William, and Joshua Waletzky. 1997[1967]. “Narrative
Analysis: Oral Versions of Personal Experience.” Journal of Narrative and Life
History 7 (1–4): 3–38.
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria. 2009. Television
Discourse: Analysing Language in the
Media. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Markham, Annette. 2012. “Fabrication
as ethical practice: Qualitative inquiry in ambiguous Internet
contexts.” Information, Communication &
Society 15 (3): 334–353.
Marwick, Alice E. 2013. Status Update:
Celebrity, Publicity, and Branding in the Social Media Age. New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
Ochs, Elinor, and Lisa Capps. 2001. Living
Narrative: Storytelling in Everyday
Talk. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Redmond, Sean. 2008. “Pieces
of Me: Celebrity Confessional Carnality.” Social
Semiotics 18 (2): 149–161.
Senft, Theresa M. 2008. Camgirls: Celebrity and
Community in the Age of Social Networks. New York: Peter Lang.
Snickars, Pelle, and Patrick Vonderau. 2009. The
Youtube Reader. Stockholm: National Library of Sweden.
Spilioti, Tereza. 2017. “Media
convergence and publicness: Towards a modular and iterative approach to online research
ethics.” Applied Linguistics
Review 8 (2–3): 191–212.
Tannen, Deborah. 1989. Talking
Voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational
Discourse. Cambridge University Press.
. 2003. “Power
Maneuvers or Connection Maneuvers? Ventriloquizing in Family
Interaction.” In Linguistics, Language, and the Real
World: Discourse and Beyond, ed by Deborah Tannen & James E. Alatis, 50–62. Georgetown University Press.
. 2004. “Talking
the Dog: Framing Pets as Interactional Resources in Family Discourse.” Research
on Language and Social
Interaction 37 (4): 399–420.
