Cover not available

In:Media as Procedures of Communication
Edited by Martin Luginbühl and Jan Georg Schneider
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 348] 2024
► pp. 1–13

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 1
Introduction

Why mediality matters — media as procedures of communication

 | University of Basel
 | University of Kaiserslautern-Landau
Published online: 21 November 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.348.01lug
Article outline
  • 1.On apparatuses and medial traces
  • 2.Medial procedures and social practices
  • 3.Overview on the contents of this book
  • Notes
  • References
References (48)
References
Arminen, Illka, Christian Licoppe, and Anna Spagnolli. 2016. “Introduction: Respecifying Mediated Interaction.” Special Issue. Research on Language and Social Interaction 49(4): 290–309. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Auer, Peter. 2000. “On line-Syntax — Oder: Was es bedeuten könnte, die Zeitlichkeit der mündlichen Sprache ernst zu nehmen.” Sprache und Literatur 85: 43–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “On-Line Syntax: Thoughts on the Temporality of Spoken Language.” Language Sciences 31: 1–13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bateman, John, Janina Wildfeuer, and Tuomo Hiippala. 2017. Multimodality: Foundations, Research and Analysis. A Problem-Oriented Introduction. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Becker-Mrotzek, Michael. 2009. “Mündliche Kommunikationskompetenz.” In Mündliche Kommunikation und Gesprächsdidaktik, edited by Michael Mrotzek, 66–83. Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Verlag Hohengehren.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bender, Michael, Ruth M. Mell, and Janina Wildfeuer. 2022. “Zur Spezifik digitaler Medien als Diskursraum: Materialität, Daten, Affordanzen.” In Diskurse — digital. Theorien, Methoden, Anwendungen, edited by Eva Gredel, 27–45. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Costa, Elisabetta. 2018. “Affordances-in-Practice: An Ethnographic Critique of Social Media Logic and Context Collapse.” New Media & Society 20(10): 3641–3656. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dang-Anh, Mark. 2019. Protest twittern. Eine medienlinguistische Untersuchung von Straßenprotesten. Bielefeld: transcript.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf. 2018. “Sprache in der multimodalen Interaktion.” In Sprache im kommunikativen, interaktiven und kulturellen Kontext, edited by Arnulf Deppermann, and Silke Reineke, 51–85. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dürscheid, Christa. 2005. “Medien, Kommunikationsformen, kommunikative Gattungen.” In Linguistik online 22(1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eckkrammer, Eva Martha. 2019. “Genre Theory and the Digital Revolution: Towards a Multidimensional Model of Genre Emergence, Classification and Analysis.” In Genre Emergence. Developments in Print, TV and Digital Media, edited by Alexander Brock, Jana Pflaeging, and Peter Schildhauer, 163–190. Berlin: Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fox, Richard, Diamantis Panagiotopoulos, and Christina Tsouparopoulou. 2015. “Affordanz.” In Materiale Textkulturen. Konzepte — Materialien — Praktiken, edited by Michael R. Ott, Rebecca Sauer, and Thomas Meier, 63–70. Berlin: de Gruyter (= Materiale Textkulturen 1). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gershon, Ilana, and Paul Manning. 2014. “Language and Media.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology, edited by N. J. Enfield, Paul Kockelman, and Jack Sidnell, 559–576. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (= Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibson, James. 1977. “The Theory of Affordances.” In Perceiving, Acting, and Knowing. Toward an Ecological Psychology, edited by John Bransford, and Robert Shaw, 67–82. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Günthner, Susanne, Paul J. Hopper. 2010. “Zeitlichkeit und sprachliche Strukturen: Pseudoclefts im Englischen und Deutschen.” Gesprächsforschung 11: 1–28. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Habscheid, Stephan. 2000. “Medium in der Pragmatik. Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme.” Deutsche Sprache 28(1): 126–143.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hartley, John. 2020. Communication, Cultural and Media Studies. The Key Concepts. Fifth edition. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hermanns, Fritz. 2012. “Sprache, Kultur und Identität.” In Der Sitz der Sprache im Leben. Beiträge zu einer kulturanalytischen Linguistik, edited by Heidrun Kämper, Angelika Linke, and Martin Wengeler, 235–276. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hutchby, Ian. 2014. “Communicative Affordances and Participation Frameworks in Mediated Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 72: 86–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jäger, Ludwig. 2000. “Die Sprachvergessenheit der Medientheorie. Ein Plädoyer für das Medium Sprache.” In Sprache und neue Medien, edited by Werner Kallmeyer, 9–30. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter (= IDS Jahrbuch 1999). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. “Wieviel Sprache braucht der Geist? Mediale Konstitutionsbedingungen des Mentalen.” In Medialität und Mentalität. Theoretische und empirische Studien zum Verhältnis von Sprache, Subjektivität und Kognition, edited by Ludwig Jäger, and Erika Linz, 15–42. München: Fink.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “Medialität”. In Handbuch Sprache und Wissen, edited by Ekkehard Felder, and Andreas Gardt, 106–122. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krämer, Sybille. 1998. “Das Medium als Spur und als Apparat.” In Medien, Computer, Realität. Wirklichkeitsvorstellungen und Neue Medien, edited by Sybille Krämer, 73–94. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linell, Per (2009): Rethinking Language, Mind and World Dialogically. Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-Making. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linz, Erika. 2016. “Sprache, Materialität, Medialität.” In Sprache — Kultur — Kommunikation. Ein internationales Handbuch zu Linguistik als Kulturwissenschaft, edited by Ludwig Jäger, Werner Holly, Peter Krapp, Samuel Weber, and Simone Heekeren, 100–111. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lotherington, Heather. 2021. “Language in Digital Motion: From ABCs to Intermediality and Why This Matters for Language Learning.” In Beyond Media Borders, Vol. 1: Intermedial Relations Among Multimodal Media, edited by Lars Elleström, 217–238. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luginbühl, Martin. 2019. “Mediale Durchformung: Fernsehinteraktion und Fernsehmündlichkeit in Gesprächen im Fernsehen.” In Interaktion und Medien. Interaktionsanalytische Zugänge zu medienvermittelter Kommunikation, edited by Konstanze Marx, and Axel Schmidt, 125–146. Heidelberg: Winter (= OraLingua 17).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Luginbühl, Martin, and Jan Georg Schneider. 2020. “Medial Shaping from the Outset: On the Mediality of the Second Presidential Debate, 2016.” Journal for Media Linguistics (jfml) 3(1): 57–93. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marx, Konstanze, and Georg Weidacher. 2020. Internetlinguistik: Ein Lehr- und Arbeitsbuch. 2., aktual. und durchges. Aufl. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McLuhan, Marshall. 1964. Understanding Media. The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meier, Stefan. 2021. “Affordanzen als mediale Dispositive. Neue Anregungen zur Konzeptualisierung des Interdependenzverhältnisses von Zeichen, Medien und kommunikativer Praxis.” Zeitschrift für Semiotik 41(1–2): 37–62.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meiler, Matthias. 2018. Eristisches Handeln in wissenschaftlichen Weblogs. Medienlinguistische Grundlagen und Analysen. Heidelberg: Synchron (= Wissenschaftskommunikation 12).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mondada, Lorenza. 2019. “Contemporary Issues in Conversation Analysis. Embodiment and Materiality, Multimodality and Multisensorality in Social Interaction.” Journal of Pragmatics 145: 47–62. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, Cornelia. 2010. “Wie Gesten bedeuten. Eine kognitiv-linguistische und sequenzanalytische Perspektive.” Sprache und Literatur 41(1): 37–68. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Münker, Stefan. 2013. “Media in Use. How the Practice Shapes the Mediality of Media.” Distinktion. Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory 14(3): 246–253. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pentzold, Christian, and Andreas Bischof. 2019. “Making Affordances Real: Socio-Material Prefiguration, Performed Agency, and Coordinated Activities in Human — Robot Communication.” Social Media + Society 5(3): 1–11. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reddy, Michael J. 1993. “The Conduit Metaphor: A Case of Frame Conflict in Our Language about Language.” In Metaphor and Thought. 2nd edition, edited by Andrew Ortony, 164–201. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmitt, Reinhold. 2015. “Positionspapier: Multimodale Interaktionsanalyse.” In Ko-Konstruktionen in der Interaktion. Die gemeinsame Arbeit an Äußerungen und anderen sozialen Ereignissen, edited by Ulrich Dausendschön-Gay, Elisabeth Gülich, and Ulrich Krafft, 43–51. Bielefeld: transcript. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmitz, Ulrich. 2015. Einführung in die Medienlinguistik. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schneider, Jan Georg. 2008. Spielräume der Medialität. Linguistische Gegenstandskonstitution aus medientheoretischer und pragmatischer Perspektive. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Medialität. In Handbuch Pragmatik, edited by Frank Liedtke, and Astrid Tuchen, 272–281. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stetter, Christian. 2005. System und Performanz. Symboltheoretische Grundlagen von Medientheorie und Sprachwissenschaft. Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stoltenburg, Benjamin. 2016. Zeitlichkeit als Ordnungsprinzip der gesprochenen Sprache. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winkler, Hartmut. 2008. Basiswissen Medien. Frankfurt a. M.: Fischer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zillien, Nicole. 2008. “Die (Wieder-)Entdeckung der Medien. Das Affordanzkonzept in der Mediensoziologie.” In Sociologia Internationalis 46(2): 161–181. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. “Affordanz.” In Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion. Handbuch zu Geschichte — Kultur — Ethik, edited by Kevin Liggieri, and Oliver Müller, 226–228. Berlin: Metzler. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zipoli Caiani, Silvano. 2014. “Extending the Notion of Affordance.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 13(2): 275–293. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue