Cover not available

In:Vagueness, Ambiguity, and All the Rest: Linguistic and pragmatic approaches
Edited by Ilaria Fiorentini and Chiara Zanchi
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 347] 2024
► pp. 234–258

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 10
Vagueness and ambiguity of perlocutionary effects in Prime Minister’s Question time sessions

 | University of Niš
Published online: 26 September 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.347.10rad
Abstract
Prime Minister’s Question time sessions are speech events in which questions are not only requests for information, and answers do not only provide the requested information. Speakers also exchange argumentation, so the illocutionary act of advancing argumentation can be regarded as a constitutive component of these speech events. More specifically, argumentation can precede the MP’s question to the Prime Minister and it can be part of the Prime Minister’s response to the MP’s question. The research tested the assumption that both (1) questions with clear locution and illocution and (2) questions with unclear locution and/or illocution can produce vague and/or ambiguous perlocutionary effects or consequences. Perlocutionary effects or consequences were classified into illocutionary and non-illocutionary perlocutionary effects or consequences (van Eemeren & Grootendorst 1984: 26–27). The analysis included 70 question-answer exchanges from two Question time sessions. The results demonstrate that disagreements can lead to non-answer responses.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical model
    • 2.1The illocutionary act and clarity
    • 2.2Vagueness
    • 2.3Ambiguity
    • 2.4Vagueness, ambiguity and perlocutionary effects
  • 3.Corpus analysis
    • 3.1Corpus
    • 3.2Methods
    • 3.3Results and discussion
      • 3.3.1TM_PMQ
      • 3.3.2BJ_PMQ
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
  • Research corpus
References (53)
References
Achimova, Asya, Maren Ebert-Rohleder, Lorenz Geiger, Joel Klenk, Michael Reid, Thalia Vollstedt, and Angelika Zirker. This volume. “Ambiguity in Discourse: The Tübingen Interdisciplinary Corpus of Ambiguity Phenomena.”
Asgeirsson, Hrafn. 2020. The Nature and Value of Vagueness in the Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ballmer, Thomas T., and Waltraud Brennenstuhl. 1981. Speech Act Classification: A Study in the Lexical Analysis of English Speech Activity Verbs. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Birner, Betty J. 2013. Introduction to Pragmatics. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Capone, Alessandro. 2016. “What Can Pragmatics Learn from the Law? (On Recanati’s Cases of Modulation, Indirect Reporting, and Cancellability of Explicatures).” In Interdisciplinary Studies in Pragmatics, Culture and Society, ed. by Alessandro Capone, and Jacob L. Mey, 371–394. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Channell, Joanna. 1994. Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ciprut, Jose V. 2008a. “Preface and Acknowledgments.” In Indeterminacy: The Mapped, the Navigable and the Uncharted, ed. by Jose V. Ciprut, xi–xv. Cambridge, Massachusetts/ London, England: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008b. “Definitions, Distinctions, and Dilemmas.” In Indeterminacy: The Mapped, the Navigable and the Uncharted, ed. by Jose V. Ciprut, 1–40. Cambridge, Massachusetts/ London, England: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cook, Roy T. 2011. “Vagueness and Meaning.” In Vagueness: A Guide, ed. by Giuseppina Ronzitti, 83–106. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cutting, Joan. 2007. “Introduction to Vague Language Explored.” In Vague Language Explored, ed. by Joan Cutting, 3–17. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1984. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deemter, Kees van. 2010. Not Exactly: In Praise of Vagueness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doerge, Friedrich Christoph. 2013. “Performative Utterances.” In Pragmatics of Speech Actions, ed. by Marina Sbisà, and Ken Turner, 203–256. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Douven, Igor. 2019. “The Rationality of Vagueness.” In Vagueness and Rationality in Language Use and Cognition, ed. by Richard Dietz, 115–134. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van. 2010. Strategic Maneuvering in Argumentative Discourse. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “Strategic Manoeuvring in Argumentative Discourse in Political Deliberation.” In Contextualizing Pragma-Dialectics, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, and Wu Peng, 123–144. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. Argumentation Theory: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Rob Grootendorst. 1984. Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Dordrecht: Foris Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eemeren, Frans H. van, and Peter Houtlosser. 1997. “Rhetorical Rationales for Dialectical Moves.” In Proceedings of the Tenth NCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation, ed. by James Klumpp, 51–56. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Égré, Paul. 2011. “Perceptual Ambiguity and the Sorites.” In Vagueness and Language Use, ed. by Paul Égré, and Nathan Klinedinst, pp. 64–90. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fortuny, Jordi, and Bernat Corominas-Murtra. 2013. “On the Origin of Ambiguity in Efficient Communication.” Journal of Logic, Language and Information 22: 249–267. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, Herbert P. 1957. “Meaning.” The Philosophical Review 64: 377–388. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gross, Steven. 2008. “Vagueness, Indeterminacy, and Uncertainty.” In Indeterminacy: The Mapped, the Navigable and the Uncharted, ed. by Jose V. Ciprut, pp. 129–149. Cambridge, Massachusetts/ London, England: The MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
House of Commons Information Office. 2005. Parliamentary Questions. Factsheet 1.
Hutchby, Ian. 2006. Media Talk: Conversation Analysis and the Study of Broadcasting. Maidenhead, Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janney, Richard W. 2002. “Cotext as Context: Vague Answers in Court.” Language and Communication 22: 457–475. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., Sara W. Smith, and Tanja Lüdge. 2003. “Interactive Aspects of Vagueness in Conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1737–1769. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kissine, Mikhail. 2008. “Locutionary, Illocutionary, Perlocutionary.” Language and Linguistics Compass 2(6): 1189–1202. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marcu, Daniel. 2000. “Perlocutions: The Achilles’ Heel of Speech Act Theory.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1719–1741. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mey, Jacob L. 2001. Pragmatics: An Introduction. Second edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mohammed, Dima A. 2009. “The Honourable Gentleman Should Make up his Mind.” Strategic Manoeuvring with Accusations of Inconsistency in Prime Minister’s Question Time. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Poesio, Massimo and Ron Artstein. 2008. “Introduction to the Special Issue on Ambiguity and Semantic Judgements.” Research on Language and Computation 6: 241–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Raffman, Diana. 2014. Unruly Words: A Study of Vague Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ronzitti, Giuseppina. 2011. “Introduction: Vagueness and…” In Vagueness: A Guide, ed. by Giuseppina Ronzitti, v–x. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rooij, Robert van. 2011. “Vagueness and Linguistics.” In Vagueness: A Guide, ed. by Giuseppina Ronzitti, 123–170. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organisation of Turn-taking for Conversation.” Language, 50: 696–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sauerland, Uli and Penka Stateva. 2011. “Two Types of Vagueness.” In Vagueness and Language Use, ed. by Paul Égré, and Nathan Klinedinst, 121–145. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sbisà, Marina. 2009. “Speech Act Theory.” In Key Notions for Pragmatics, ed. by Jef Verschueren, and Jan-Ola Östman, 229–244. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Locution, illocution, perlocution.” In Pragmatics of Speech Actions, ed. by Marina Sbisà and Ken Turner, 25–76. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scheffler, Israel. 1979. Beyond the Letter: A Philosophical Inquiry into Ambiguity, Vagueness and Metaphor in Language. London, Boston and Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R., and Daniel Vanderveken. 1985. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya. 2022. The Book of Answers: Alignment, Autonomy, and Affiliation in Social Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tuggy, David. 1993. “Ambiguity, Polysemy, and Vagueness.” Cognitive Linguistics 4(3): 273–290. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef. 1980. On Speech Act Verbs. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Voghera, Miriam. This volume. “The Role of Ambiguity in Intentional Vagueness.”
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zarefsky, David. 2019. “Strategic Ambiguity as an Argumentative Resource: The Case of Lyndon Johnson, 50 years later.” In Argumentation in Actual Practice, ed. by Frans H. van Eemeren, and Bart Garssen, 103–105. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Research corpus
Boris Johnson’s First PMQs: 4 September 2019. [URL], last access date: 21 July 2022.
Theresa May Receives Standing Ovation from MPs in her Final Prime Minister’s Questions | ITV News Streamed live on Jul 24, 2019. [URL], last access date: 20 July 2022.
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue