Cover not available

In:Structures in Discourse: Interaction, adaptability, and pragmatic functions
Edited by Martin Gill, Aino Malmivirta and Brita Wårvik
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 345] 2024
► pp. 124–155

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Emoji and illocutionarity

Acting on, and acting as, language

 | Indiana University Bloomington
 | University of California Berkeley
Published online: 7 August 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.345.07her
Abstract
Emoji can modify a textual utterance, constitute a stand-alone speech act, or virtually perform an action. These three broad types of pragmatic function are usually treated separately in the literature when they are treated at all. We classify these functions in a systematic, unified manner by drawing on the classic speech act notion of illocutionarity. We present a conceptually motivated typology that accounts for the three basic types of emoji function, as well as most pragmatic functions reported in previous emoji research, illustrating it with data from American and Chinese social media. The scheme can serve as a practical heuristic to guide empirical research on emoji use and a theoretical anchor for pragmatic studies of other graphicon types.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Illocutionarity and classic speech act theory
    • 2.2Speech acts and performativity in textual CMC
      • 2.2.1Speech acts in textual CMC
      • 2.2.2Performativity in textual CMC
    • 2.3Emoji and illocutionarity
      • 2.3.1Emoji as speech acts
      • 2.3.2Emoji as IFIDs
        • 2.3.2.1Tone modification
        • 2.3.2.2Emoji as punctuation
  • 3.Data sources and analytical approach
    • 3.1Data sources
    • 3.2Analytical approach
  • 4.The classification scheme
    • 4.1Examples of IFIDs
    • 4.2Examples of IAs
      • 4.2.1Communicative acts
      • 4.2.2Behave acts
  • 5.Discussion: Boundary cases
  • 6.Conclusion: Theoretical and practical implications
  • Notes
  • References
References (64)
References
Austin, John L. 1956. “Performative Utterances.” In Philosophical Papers, ed. by John L. Austin, 1979, 233–252. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1962. How to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955, ed. by J. O. Urmson and Marina Sbisà. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bach, Kent, and Robert M. Harnish. 1979. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. London, UK: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bailey, Kenneth D. 1994. Typologies and Taxonomies: An Introduction to Classification Techniques (vol. 102). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Baron, Naomi S. 1998. “Letters by Phone or Speech by Other Means: The Linguistics of Email.” Language and Communication 18: 133–170. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beißwenger, Michael, and Steffen Pappert. 2019. “How to be Polite with Emojis: A Pragmatic Analysis of Face Work Strategies in an Online Learning Environment.” European Journal of Applied Linguistics 7 (2): 225–253. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Camfield, Jon. 1998. Action Verbs as Illocutionary Verbs on the Internet. Unpublished ms. [URL]
. 1999. Talk, Type, and Text: Conversation on the Internet. Honor’s thesis, University of Texas at Austin. [URL]
Carr, Caleb T., David B. Schrock, and Patricia Dauterman. 2012. “Speech Acts within Facebook Status Messages.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 31 (2): 176–196. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cherny, Lynn. 1994. “Gender Differences in Text-based Virtual Reality.” In Cultural Performances: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Women and Language Conference, ed. by Mary Bucholtz, A. C. Liang, Laurel A. Sutton, and Caitlin Hines, 102–115. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. “The Modal Complexity of Speech Events in a Social MUD.” Electronic Journal of Communication 5 (4). [URL]
Cohn, Neil, Jan Engelen, and Joost Schilperoord. 2019. “The Grammar of Emoji? Constraints on Communicative Pictorial Sequencing.” Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 4 (1): 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cramer, Henriette, Paloma De Juan, and Joel Tetreault. 2016. “Sender-Intended Functions of Emojis in US Messaging.” In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, 504–509. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dainas, Ashley, and Susan C. Herring. 2021. “Interpreting Emoji Pragmatics.” In Internet Pragmatics: Theory and Practice, ed. by Chaoqun Xie, Francisco Yus, and Helmut Haberland, 107–144. Amsterdam/New York: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Danesi, Marcel. 2016. The Semiotics of Emoji: The Rise of Visual Language in the Age of the Internet. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Doerge, Friedrich C. 2013. “Performative Utterances.” In Pragmatics of Speech Actions, ed. by Marina Sbisà and Ken Turner, 203–256. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Domaneschi, Filippo, Marcelo Passarelli, and Carlo Chiorri. 2017. “Facial Expressions and Speech Acts: Experimental Evidences on the Role of the Upper Face as an Illocutionary Force Indicating Device in Language Comprehension.” Cognitive Processing 18 (5). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dresner, Eli, and Susan C. Herring. 2010. ”Functions of the Non-Verbal in CMC: Emoticons and Illocutionary Force.” Communication Theory 20: 249–268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dürscheid, Christa, and Dimitrios Meletis. 2019. “Emojis: A Grapholinguistic Approach.” In Graphemics in the 21st Century, ed. by Yannis Haralambous, 167–183. Brest: Fluxus Editions. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Francis, Gill, and Susan Hunston. 1992. “Analyzing Everyday Conversation.” In Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis, ed. by Malcolm Coulthard, 1–34. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gawne, Lauren, and Gretchen McCulloch. 2019. “Emoji as Digital Gestures.” Language@Internet 17: article 2. [URL]
Ge, Jing, and Ulrike Gretzel. 2018. “Emoji Rhetoric: A Social Media Influencer Perspective.” Journal of Marketing Management 34 (15–16): 1272–1295. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ge, Jing, and Susan C. Herring. 2018. “Communicative Functions of Emoji Sequences on Sina Weibo.” First Monday 23 (11).
Ge-Stadnyk, Jing. 2021. “Communicative Functions of Emoji Sequences in the Context of Self-Presentation: A Comparative Study of Weibo and Twitter Users.” Discourse & Communication 15 (4): 369–387. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herring, Susan C. 2007. “A Faceted Classification Scheme for Computer-Mediated Discourse.” Language@Internet 4: article 1. [URL]
2012. “Grammar and Electronic Communication.” In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ed. by Carol A. Chapelle, 1–9. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2019. “Grammar and Electronic Communication.” In The Concise Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, ed. by Carol A. Chapelle. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2022. “Internet Relay Chat: From Fish-slap to LOL.” In “You Are Not Expected to Understand This”: How 26 Lines of Code Changed the World, ed. by Torie Bosch, 75–80. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herring, Susan C., and Ashley Dainas. 2017. “Nice Picture Comment!’ Graphicons in Facebook Comment Threads.” In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2185–2194. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herring, Susan C., Anupam Das, and Shashikant Penumarthy. 2005. CMC Act Taxonomy. [URL]
Herring, Susan C., and Jing Ge. 2020. ”Do Emoji Sequences Have a Preferred Word Order?” In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Emoji Understanding and Applications in Social Media. [URL]
Ilyas, Sanaa, and Qamar Khushi. 2012. “Facebook Status Updates: A Speech Act Analysis.” Academic Research International 3 (2): 500–507.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kapidzic, Sanja, and Susan C. Herring. 2011. “Gender, Communication, and Self-Presentation in Teen Chatrooms Revisited: Have Patterns Changed? Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17 (1): 39–59. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kazmi, Alienna, Arooj Rana, Uzma Anjum, and Madiha Khan. 2019. “‘A Picture is Worth a Thousand Words, and So is an Emojis 🙂’ Emojisfication of Language: A Pragmatic Analysis of Facebook Discourse.” In Proceedings of the 2019 Purdue Linguistics, Literature, and Second Language Studies Conference, 3. Lafayette, IN: Purdue University. [URL]
Kelly, Ryan, and Leon Watts. 2015. “Characterising the Inventive Appropriation of Emoji as Relationally Meaningful in Mediated Close Personal Relationships.” Paper presented at Experiences of Technology Appropriation: Unanticipated Users, Usage, Circumstances, and Design, Oslo, Norway, September 20. [URL]
Konrad, Artie, Susan C. Herring, and David Choi. 2020. “Sticker and Emoji Use in Facebook Messenger: Implications for Graphicon Change.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 25 (3): 217–235. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kozinets, Robert. 2019. Netnography: The Essential Guide to Qualitative Social Media Research. Los Angles: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Li, Li, and Yue Yang. 2018. “Pragmatic Functions of Emoji in Internet-based Communication – A Corpus-based Study.” Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 3 (1): 1–12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McQuarrie, Edward F., Jessica Miller, and Barbara J. Phillips. 2013. “The Megaphone Effect: Taste and Audience in Fashion Blogging.” Journal of Consumer Research, 40 (1): 136–158. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nastri, Jacqueline, Jorge Peña, and Jeffrey T. Hancock. 2006. “The Construction of Away Messages: A Speech Act Analysis.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11 (4): 1025–1045. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nemer, David. 2016. “Celebrities Acting Up: A Speech Act Analysis in Tweets of Famous People.” Social Networking 5 (01): 1–10. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmer, Frank R. 1986. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parkes, Malcolm B. 1992. Pause and Effect. An Introduction to the History of Punctuation in the West. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pavalanathan, Umashanthi, and Jacob Eisenstein. 2016. “More Emojis, Less :) The Competition for Paralinguistic Function in Microblog Writing.” First Monday 21 (11). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Provine, Robert, Robert J. Spencer, and Darcy L. Mandell. 2007. “Emotional Expression Online: Emoticons Punctuate Website Text Messages.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 26 (3): 299–307. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sampietro, Agnese. 2016. “Exploring the Punctuation Effect of Emoji in Spanish Whatsapp Chats.” Lenguas Modernas 47: 91–113.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. “Emoji and Rapport Management in Spanish WhatsApp chats.” Journal of Pragmatics 143: 109–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language (vol. 626). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1976. “A Classification of Illocutionary Acts.” Language in Society 5 (1): 1–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R., and Daniel Vanderveken. 1985. “Speech Acts and Illocutionary Logic.” In Logic, Thought and Action. Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, vol 2, ed. by Daniel Vanderveken, 109–132. Dordrecht: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tang, Ying, and Khe Foon Hew. 2019. “Emoticon, Emoji, and Sticker Use in Computer-Mediated Communication: A Review of Theories and Research Findings.” International Journal of Communication 13: 2457–2483.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tang, Ying, Khe Foon Hew, Susan C. Herring, and Qian Chen. 2021. “(Mis)Communication Through Stickers in Online Group Discussions: A Multiple-Case Study.” Discourse & Communication 15 (5): 582–606. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tiidenberg, Katrin, and Andrew Whelan. 2017. “Sick Bunnies and Pocket Dumps: “Not-selfies” and the Genre of Self-representation.” Popular Communication 15 (2): 141–153. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tolins, Jackson, and Patrawat Samermit. 2016. “GIFs as Embodied Enactments in Text-mediated Conversation.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 49 (2): 75–91. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Virtanen, Tuija. 2013. “Performativity in Computer-Mediated Communication.” In Handbook of Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication, ed. by Susan C. Herring, Dieter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen, 269–290. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. “*Sings Myself Happy Birthday* Externalizing and Reassuming Self in Virtual Performatives.” International Journal of Language and Culture 5 (2): 248–270. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. “Fragments Online: Virtual Performatives in Recreational Discourse.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 53 (1): 1–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022. “Virtual Performatives as Face-Work Practices on Twitter: Relying on Self-Reference and Humour.” Journal of Pragmatics 189: 134–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Webster’s New World College Dictionary. (2010). “Illocutionary.” 4th Edition. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yus, Francisco. 2014. “Not All Emoticons are Created Equal.” Linguagem em (Dis)curso 14 (3): 511–529. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. “Emoji: A Full Cyberpragmatic Approach.” Paper presented at the 16th China Pragmatics Conference, Nanchang, China, August 17. [URL]
Zhou, Rui, Jasmine Hentschel, and Neha Kumar. 2017. ”Goodbye Text, Hello Emoji: Mobile Communication on WeChat in China.” In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 748–759. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

García-Montes, Andrea
2025. Kisses and peaches. Internet Pragmatics 8:2 ► pp. 214 ff. DOI logo
Orazi, Francesco & Davide Lucantoni
2025. Il ruolo delle tecnologie digitali nella mediazione delle relazioni istituzionali e dei processi di apprendimento nelle scuole italiane. PRISMA Economia - Società - Lavoro :1 ► pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Ping, Wanlin & Ayeshah Syed
2025. Emoji types and functions in online medical consultations on a Chinese medical platform. Journal of World Languages 11:2 ► pp. 343 ff. DOI logo
Sampietro, Agnese & Carmen Pérez-Sabater
2025. Pragmatic approaches to visual discourses in digital interactions. Internet Pragmatics 8:2 ► pp. 141 ff. DOI logo
Wu, Yanmin & Yiqiong Zhang
2025. Face-work on Chinese social media. Internet Pragmatics 8:2 ► pp. 186 ff. DOI logo
Gwiazdowska, Agnieszka
2024. Beyond a text: A Cyberpragmatics approach to multimodality (image-text relation) in instant messaging communication in the age of Society 5.0. In Language, Technology, Humanities in Society 5.0, ► pp. 67 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue