Cover not available

In:Structures in Discourse: Interaction, adaptability, and pragmatic functions
Edited by Martin Gill, Aino Malmivirta and Brita Wårvik
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 345] 2024
► pp. 18–35

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Evaluation as a persuasive tactic in the 2012 Obama-Romney debates

 | Sam Houston State University
Published online: 7 August 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.345.02hal
Abstract
The focus of this article is the deictic evaluative construction that’s, as used by Barack Obama and Mitt Romney during the 2012 presidential debates. A summative clause, often toward the end of a discourse turn, opened by the distal demonstrative pronoun that, has a persuasive function, evaluating the immediately preceding discourse content. This construction allows the speaker to evaluate his own message positively and the opponent’s message negatively; it also structures the content clearly and concisely, helping to portray the speaker as one with a strong and clear agenda. A quantitative comparison of the usage of the that’s construction with regard to Obama and Romney shows that both used it equally during the first debate; however, in the second debate, Obama doubled its use. This chapter brings together a concept from narrative theory (evaluation) and a concept from rhetoric (the persuasive function of language), as these two concepts intersect within the persuasive genre of presidential debates.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.That’s as part of an evaluation for a persuasive purpose
  • 3.Data and methodology
  • 4.Results and discussion
    • 4.1Summarizing and structuring
    • 4.2Underscoring the reasons: That’s why
    • 4.3Pathways to goals: That’s how
    • 4.4The negative that’s not
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (31)
References
Allen, Ira, and Elizabeth A. Flynn. 2016. “Barack Obama’s Significance for Rhetoric and Composition.” College Composition and Communication 67 (3): 465–469. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Lara. 2012. “Mitt Romney Won the Night, But Will It Change the Race?” Debate Club, October 4, 2012. [URL]. Accessed October 4, 2012.
Cabrejas Peñuelas, Ana Belén, and Mercedes Díez Prados. 2013. “The Evaluative Function of Cohesive Devices in Three Political Texts.” In Research Trends in Intercultural Pragmatics, ed. by Istvan Kecskes, and Jésus Romero-Trillo, 317–341. Mouton Series in Pragmatics 16. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coe, Kevin, and Michael Reitzes. 2010. “Obama on the Stump: Features and Determinants of a Rhetorical Approach.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 40 (3): 391–413. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
The Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD), October 3, 2012. [URL]. Accessed March 27, 2023.
, October 16, 2012. [URL]. Accessed March 27, 2023.
C-SPAN. 2012a. Campaign 2012: 2012 Presidential Candidates Debate. October 3, 2012. Part of Road to the White House: Presidential Debate at the University of Denver. [URL]. Accessed March 24, 2024.
. 2012b. Campaign 2012: 2012 Presidential Candidates Debate. October 16, 2012. Part of Road to the White House: Presidential Debate at Hofstra University. [URL]. Accessed March 24, 2024.
De Fina, Anna, and Alexandra Georgakopoulou. 2012. Analyzing Narrative: Discourse and Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(eds). [2015] 2019. The Handbook of Narrative Analysis. Oxford: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
(eds). 2020. The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Díez Prados, Mercedes, and Ana Belén Cabrejas Peñuelas. 2012. “Cohesion in American Political Rhetoric: The Gettysburg Address, I have a Dream and Obama’s Inaugural Address.” Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense 20: 37–60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Halmari, Helena, and Tuija Virtanen. 2005. “Towards Understanding Modern Persuasion.” In Persuasion across Genres: A Linguistic Approach, ed. by Helena Halmari, and Tuija Virtanen, 229–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hatch, Evelyn. 1992. Discourse and Language in Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H. 1997. “Persuasion by Inference: Analysis of a Party Political Broadcast.” In Political Linguistics, ed. by Jan Blommaert, and Chris Bulcaen, 121–137. Belgian Journal of Linguistics 11. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Language in the Inner City. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1997. “Some Further Steps in Narrative Analysis.” In Oral Versions of Personal Experience: Three Decades of Narrative Analysis, ed. by Michael Bamberg, 395–415. Special Issue of Journal of Narrative and Life History 7 (1–4). Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William, and Joshua Waletzky. 1967. “Narrative Analysis: Oral Versions of Personal Experience.” In Essays on the Verbal and Visual Arts: Proceedings of the 1966 Annual Spring Meeting of the American Ethnological Society, ed. by June Helm, 12–44. Seattle, WA: American Ethnological Society.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mey, Jacob L. 2001. Pragmatics: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Connell, Ford. 2012a. “Denver Debate Was a Game-Changing Win for Romney.” Debate Club, October 4, 2012. [URL]. Accessed March 27, 2023.
. 2012b. “Town Hall Style Gave Obama an Edge.” Debate Club, October 17, 2012. [URL]. Accessed March 27, 2023.
Östman, Jan-Ola. 1987. “Pragmatic Markers of Persuasion.” In Propaganda, Persuasion and Polemic, ed. by Jeremy Hawthorn, 90–105. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Partington, Alan, and Charlotte Taylor. 2018. The Language of Persuasion in Politics: An Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
PrimeStudyGuides. “Barack Obama’s Presidential Announcement Speech.” [URL]. Accessed March 27, 2023.
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1994. Approaches to Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans-Jörg. 2000. English Abstract Nouns as Conceptual Shells: From Corpus to Cognition. Topics of English Linguistics 34. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scollon, Ron. 2001. “Action and Text: Towards an Integrated Understanding of the Place of Text in Social (Inter)Action, Mediated Discourse Analysis and the Problem of Social Action.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Ruth Wodak, and Michael Meyer, 139–183. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simmons, Jamal. 2012. “Romney’s Debate Performance will Light Fire under Obama Supporters.” Debate Club, October 4, 2012. [URL]. Accessed March 27, 2023.
Virtanen, Tuija. 1992. “Temporal Adverbials in Text Structuring: On Temporal Text Strategy.” In Nordic Research on Text and Discourse: NORDTEXT Symposium 1990, ed. by Ann-Charlotte Lindeberg, Nils Erik Enkvist, and Kay Wikberg, 185–197. Turku: Åbo Akademis Förlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Virtanen, Tuija, and Helena Halmari. 2005. “Persuasion across Genres: Emerging Perspectives.” In Persuasion across Genres: A Linguistic Approach, ed. by Helena Halmari, and Tuija Virtanen, 3–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
“Who Won the First Debate between Mitt Romney and Barack Obama?” 2012. Debate Club, October 4, 2012. [URL]. Accessed March 27, 2023.
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue