Cover not available

In:(Non)referentiality in Conversation
Edited by Michael C. Ewing and Ritva Laury
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 344] 2024
► pp. 167–202

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 9
An interactional approach to generic second person expressions in Mandarin conversation

 | University of California Los Angeles
Published online: 1 August 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.344.09tao
Abstract
This chapter tackles the hitherto under-explored question of when and why conversationalists deploy second person generic expressions that feature a general and vague referential scope. I show that the conversational contexts in which they appear are usually characterized most prominently by their relatively complex and/or controversial subject matters, participants’ incongruent stances, and/or opposing positions to be contested. These contexts and their associated interactional demands are argued to give rise to the patterning of clustering (multiplicity of instances in adjacent units), limited generality (as good-enough-yet-not-too-broad general statements), and primary (or attempted primary) speakership. In general, second person generic statements can be seen as a special and powerful rhetorical device designed for marked interactional occasions.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Materials and methodology
  • 3.General broad patterns in conversation
    • 3.1Clustering
    • 3.2Locally conditioned generalities
    • 3.3Primary speaker roles
  • 4.Social activities: When and why speakers deploy second person generic expressions?
    • 4.1Complex informing
    • 4.2Persuasion
    • 4.3Argumentation
  • 5.Discussion
    • 5.1The preference for clusters
    • 5.2Limited generality
    • 5.3The association with a primary speaker role (or lack thereof if primary speakership is more dynamically negotiated)
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
References (44)
References
Berry, Roger. 2009. “You Could Say That: The Generic Second-Person Pronoun in Modern English.” English Today 25 (3): 29–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biq, Yung-O. 1991. “The Multiple Uses of the Second Person Singular Pronoun Ni in Conversational Mandarin.” Journal of Pragmatics 16 (4): 307–321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul and David J. M. Weenink. 2021. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer. [URL]. Last retrieved January 2021.
Bolinger, Dwight. 1979a. “To Catch a Metaphor: You as Norm.” American Speech 54 (3): 194–209. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1979b. “Pronouns in Discourse.” In Discourse and Syntax, ed. by Talmy Givon, 287–309. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope. 2007. “Principles of Person Reference in Tzeltal Conversation.” In Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives, ed. by N. J. Enfield and Tanya Stivers, 172–202. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Canavan, Alexandra and George Zipperlen. 1996. CALLFRIEND Mandarin Chinese-Mainland Dialect. Linguistic Data Consortium, Philadelphia.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1987. “Cognitive Constraints on Information Flow.” In Coherence and Grounding in Discourse, ed. by Russell Tomlin, 21–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1994. Discourse, Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious Experience in Speaking and Writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Margret Selting. 2018. Interactional Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dahmen, Josua, and Joe Blythe. 2022. “Calibrating Recipiency through Pronominal Reference”. Interactional Linguistics 2 (2): 190–224. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 1980. “Beyond Definiteness: The Trace of Identity in Discourse.” In The Pear Stories: Cognitive, Cultural, and Linguistic Aspects of Narrative Production, ed. by Wallace L. Chafe, 203–74. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2006. Transcription in Action: Resources for the Representation of Linguistic Interaction. [URL]. Last accessed May 22, 2021.
2007. “The Stance Triangle.” In Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, ed. by Robert Englebretson, 139–182. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W., Stephan Schuetze-Coburn, Susanna Cumming, and Danae Paolino. 1993. “Outline of Discourse Transcription.” In Talking Data, ed. by Jane Edwards and Martin Lampert, 45–89. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erbaum Associates.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ford, Cecilia E. 1994. “Dialogic Aspects of Talk and Writing: Because on the Interactive-Edited Continuum.” Text 14 (4): 531–554.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. H. 1996. “Informings and Announcements in Their Environment: Prosody within a Multi-Activity Work Setting.” In Prosody in Conversation: Interactional Studies, ed. by E. Couper-Kuhlen and M. Selting, 436–461. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanks, William. 2007. “Person Reference in Yucatec Maya Conversation.” In Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives, ed. by N. J. Enfield and Tanya Stivers, 149–171. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Heritage, John. 1984. “A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of Its Sequential Placement.” In Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis, ed. by J. Maxwell Atkinson and John Heritage, 299–345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “Intersubjectivity and Progressivity in Person (and Place) Reference.” In Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives, ed. by N. J. Enfield and Tanya Stivers, 255–280. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 45 (1): 1–29. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hsiao, Chi-hua. 2011. “Personal Pronoun Interchanges in Mandarin Chinese Conversation.” Language Sciences 33 (5): 799–821. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kitagawa, Chisato and Adrienne Lehrer. 1990. “Impersonal Uses of Personal Pronouns.” Journal of Pragmatics 14 (5): 739–759. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kuo, Sai-Hua. 2002. “From Solidarity to Antagonism: The Uses of the Second-Person Singular Pronoun in Chinese Political Discourse.” Text 22 (1): 29–55.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Laberge, Suzanne and Gillian Sankoff. 1979. “Anything You Can Do.” In Discourse and Syntax, ed. by Talmy Givon, 419–440. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William and David Fanshel. 1977. Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lerner, Gene. 1996. “On the Place of Linguistic Resources in The Organization of Talk-in-Interaction: ‘Second Person’ Reference in Multi-Party Conversation.” Pragmatics 6 (3): 281–294.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lü, Shuxiang. 1985. Jindai Hanyu Zhidaici [Demonstratives and Pronouns in Modern Chinese], Shanghai: Xuelin Publishing Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rubba, Jo. 1996. “Alternate Grounds in the Interpretation of Deictic Expressions.” In Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar, ed. by G. Fauconnier and E. Sweetser, 227–261. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey. 1965/1992. Part II, Lecture 6, “‘You’.” In Lectures on Conversation Vol 1, ed. by Gail Jefferson, with an introduction by Emanuel A. Schegloff, 163–168. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1966/1992. Part III, Lecture 11, “‘You’.” In Lectures on Conversation Vol. 1, ed. by Gail Jefferson, with an introduction by Emanuel A. Schegloff, 348–353. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1969/1992. Part II, Lecture 9, “Sound Shifts; Showing Understanding; Dealing with ‘Utterance Completion; Practical Mysticism.” In Lectures on Conversation Vol. 2 (Winter 1969), ed. by Gail Jefferson, 137–149. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1975. “Everyone Has to Lie.” In Sociocultural Dimensions of Language Use, ed. by Ben G. Blount and Mary Sanches, 57–79. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, H. and Schegloff, E. A. 1979. “Two Preferences in The Organization of Reference to Persons in Conversation And Their Interaction.” In Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, ed. by George Psathas, 15–21. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson. 1974. “A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation.” Language 50 (4): 696–735. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Siewierska, Anna. 2004. Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan and D. Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd edition). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stirling, Lesley, and Lenore Manderson. 2011. “About You: Empathy, Objectivity and Authority.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (6): 1581–1602. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanya, N. J. Enfield, and Stephen C. Levinson. 2007. “Person Reference in Interaction.” In Person Reference in Interaction: Linguistic, Cultural and Social Perspectives, ed. by N. J. Enfield and Tanya Stivers, 1–20. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wales, Katie. 1996. Personal Pronouns in Present-Day English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Xiang, Xuehua. 2019. “Personal Pronouns in Chinese Discourse.” In The Routledge Handbook of Chinese Discourse Analysis, ed. by Chris Shei, 147–159. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Liu, Yingsheng & Hongyin Tao
2025. More than a summarizing conjunction. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue