In:The Pragmatics of Hypocrisy
Edited by Sandrine Sorlin and Tuija Virtanen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 343] 2024
► pp. 214–230
Chapter 9The – mostly – brighter side of hypocrisy and the concept of face
Published online: 1 March 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.343.09dri
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.343.09dri
Abstract
This chapter considers the relation between hypocrisy and the concept of face. It is argued that face is an
ideal lens through which to view both the inevitability of hypocrisy and also its various hues. This inevitability is
the result of the unavoidability of face in interaction. Face is more than an affective attribute to which homage must
be paid. It is the essential means without which most communication would grind to a halt, and in that facework
involves interactants giving off impressions of themselves and forming impressions of others present which may not be
correct, there is a sense in which face makes hypocrites of us all. Examples of this accidental and essentially
beneficial hypocrisy are analysed in support of this argument. The chapter then proceeds to an example of the more
obviously beneficial facet of hypocrisy, when it is used to save and/or enhance people’s faces. A subsequent brief
consideration of hypocrisy in speech acts again finds that it has positive social value.
Keywords: hypocrisy, face, face-saving, face-maintenance, face-damage, mask, self-image, morality, impersonation, feigning
Article outline
- 1.Introduction: appearance and reality
- 2.The relation between face and hypocrisy
- 3.The nature of face: Appearance as reality
- 4.Hypocrisy round (almost) every corner
- 5.Saving face and increasing amity
- 6.Speech acts
- 7.Finally: A nod to the dark side
Notes References
References (30)
Arundale, Robert B. 2013. “Face as a
Research Focus in Interpersonal Pragmatics: Relational and Emic
Perspectives.” Journal of
Pragmatics 58: 108–120.
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987
[1978]. Politeness: Some Universals in Language
Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [Main body of which first published
in Questions and Politeness, ed. by E. Goody. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]
Christophersen, Paul. 1957. Some
Thoughts on the Study of English as a Foreign
Language. Oslo: Olaf Norlis Forlag.
Coles, The Reverend
Richard. 2014. Fathomless Riches: Or How I Went From Pop To
Pulpit. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness:
Using Language to Cause
Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goffman, Erving. 1963. Behavior
in Public Places: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. New York: Free Press.
. 1967
[1955]. “On
Face-Work”. In Erving Goffman (collection), Interaction
Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face
Behaviour, 5–45. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
[Originally in Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal
Processes 18 (3): 213–231).
. 1981
[1979]. “Footing.” In Erving Goffman (collection), Forms
of
Talk. 124–159. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 124–159.
[Originally
in Semiotica 25: 1–29.]
Haugh, Michael. 2009. “Face
and Interaction”. In Face, Communication and Social
Interaction, ed. by Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini, and Michael Haugh, 1–30. London: Equinox.
Hill, Beverly, Sachiko Ide, Shoko Ikuta, Akiko Kawasaki, and Tsunao Ogino. 1986. “Universals
of Linguistic Politeness: Quantitative Evidence from Japanese and American
English.” Journal of
Pragmatics 10: 347–371.
Ide, Sachiko. 1989. “Formal
Forms and Discernment: Two Neglected Aspects of Universals of Linguistic
Politeness.” Multilingua 8: 223–248.
Kasper, Gabriele. 1990. “Linguistic
Politeness: Current Research Issues.” Journal of
Pragmatics 14 (2): 193–218.
Kinnison, Li-Qing. 2017. “Power,
Integrity, and Mask: An Attempt to Disentangle the Chinese Face
Concept.” Journal of
Pragmatics 114: 32–48.
Lim, Tae-Sop, and John W. Bowers. 1991. “Facework:
Solidarity, Approbation, and Tact.” Human Communication
Research 17(3): 415–450.
Locher, Miriam A. 2008. “Relational
Work, Politeness and Identity
Construction.” In Handbooks of Applied Linguistics.
Volume 2: Interpersonal Communication, ed. by Gerd Antos, Eija Ventola, and Tilo Weber, 509–540. Berlin / New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Mao, LuMing R. 1994. “Beyond
Politeness Theory: ‘Face’ Revisited and Renewed.” Journal of
Pragmatics 21: 451–486.
Nickel, Gerhard. 1985. “How
‘Native’ Can (or Should) a Non-native Speaker Be?” ITL Review of Applied
Linguistics 67–68.
Nwoye, Onuigbe G. 1992. “Linguistic
Politeness and Sociocultural Variation of the Notion of Face.” Journal of
Pragmatics 18 (4): 309–328.
O’Driscoll, Jim. 2007. “What’s
in an FTA? Reflections on a Chance Meeting with Claudine.” Journal of
Politeness
Research 3 (2): 243–268.
. 2011. “Some
issues with the Concept of Face: When, What, How and How
Much? In Politeness Across
Cultures, ed. by Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 17–41. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
. 2017. “Face
and (Im)politeness.” In The Palgrave Handbook of
Linguistic (Im)Politeness, ed. by Jonathan Culpeper, Michael Haugh, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 89–119. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
. 2022. “Face-work.” In The
Routledge International Handbook of Goffman Studies, ed. by Michael Hviid Jacobsen, and Greg Smith, 85–96. Abingdon: Routledge.
Sifianou, Maria. 2011. “On
the Concept of Face and Politeness.” In Politeness
Across Cultures, ed. by Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini, and Dániel Z. Kádár, 42–58. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Sifianou, Maria, and Angeliki Tzanne. 2021. “Face,
Facework and Face-Threatening Acts.” In The Cambridge
Handbook of Sociopragmatics, ed. by Michael Haugh, Dániel Z. Kádár, and Marina Terkourafi, 249–271. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2009. “Face,
Identity and Interactional Goals.” In Face,
Communication and Social Interaction, ed. by Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini, and Michael Haugh, 137–154. London: Equinox.