Cover not available

In:The Pragmatics of Hypocrisy
Edited by Sandrine Sorlin and Tuija Virtanen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 343] 2024
► pp. 15–42

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 2
A pragmatic model of hypocrisy

 | University Paul-Valéry – Montpellier 3
 | Åbo Akademi University
Published online: 1 March 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.343.02sor
Abstract
Based on the general definition of hypocrisy given in the introductory chapter, this chapter shows how pragmatics can deepen and add to the understanding of hypocrisy. It first guides the reader to think differently about this traditionally morally-laden and negatively-evaluated notion. It then sets out to establish the pragmatic space of verbal hypocrisy by confronting it with the notions of face, tact, flattery, politeness, irony, deception, and lying. To be identified as such, hypocrisy appears to require a reveal by or through a third party, but it can be left unexposed in contexts where people jointly play along with it, and occasionally even be disclosed by the hypocrite. As a first attempt to date, we devise a pragmatic model of verbal hypocrisy. The chapter concludes with a comment on the need for a renewed philosophy of language.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Thinking differently about hypocrisy
  • 3.A pragmatic analysis
  • 4.Proximity to established pragmatic notions
    • 4.1Face
    • 4.2Tact
    • 4.3Flattery
    • 4.4Politeness
    • 4.5Irony
    • 4.6Deception
    • 4.7Lying
  • 5.A pragmatic model of hypocrisy
  • 6.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
References (64)
References
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1978. “Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena." In Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, ed. by Esther N. Goody, 56-310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown, Penelope, and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Capraro, Valerio, Matjaz Perc, and Daniele Vilone. 2020. “Lying on Networks: The Role of Structure and Topology in Promoting Honesty.” Physical Review E 101. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chan, Elaine, and Jaideep Sengupta. 2010. “Insincere Flattery Actually Works: A Dual Attitudes Perspective.” Journal of Marketing Research 47 (1): 122–133. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H. 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert H., and Richard J. Gerrig. 1984. “On the Pretense Theory of Irony.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 113 (1): 121–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Colston, Herbert, and Jennifer O’Brien. 2000. “Contrast and Pragmatics in Figurative Language: Anything Understatement Can Do, Irony Can Do Better.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1557–1583. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Conway, Erik, and Naomi Oreskes. 2015. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. Bloomsbury Press. Reprint edition.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, Michael Haugh, and Valeria Sinkeviciute. 2017. The Palgrave Handbook of (Im)politeness. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Culpeper, Jonathan, and Vittorio Tantucci. 2021. “The Principle of (Im)politeness Reciprocity.” Journal of Pragmatics 175: 146–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Danziger, Roni. 2020. The Pragmatics of Flattery: The Strategic Use of Solidarity-oriented Actions.” Journal of Pragmatics 170: 413–425. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2023. Positive Social Acts: A Metapragmatic Exploration of the Brighter and Darker Sides of Sociability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davidson, Jenny. 2004. Hypocrisy and the Politics of Politeness: Manners and Morals from Locke to Austen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Saussure, Louis. 2005. “Manipulation and Cognitive Pragmatics: Preliminary Hypotheses.” In Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century: Discourse, Language, Mind, ed. by Louis de Saussure, and Peter Schulz, 113–145. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dews, Shelly, Joan Kaplan, and Ellen Winner. 2007. “Why not Say it Directly? The Social Functions of Irony.” In Irony in Language and Thought: A Cognitive Science Reader, ed. by Raymond W. Gibbs, and Herbert L. Colston, 297–317. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 2005. “L’usage stratégique de l’argumentation.” Négociations 2 (4): 59–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eylon, Yuval, and David Heyd. 2008. “Flattery.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (3): 685–704. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fein, Ellen, and Sherrie Schneiber. 1995. All the Rules: Time-tested Secrets for Capturing the Heart of Mr. Right. Boston: Little, Brown & Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feinberg, Leonard. 2002. Hypocrisy: Don’t Leave Home Without It. Greeley: Pilgrims’ Process.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fielding, Henry. 1967 [1742]. The History of the Adventures of Joseph Andrews and of his Friend Mr Abraham Adams and An Apology for the Life of Mrs Shamela Andrews. Edited by Douglas Brooks-Davies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. 2005. On Bullshit. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fu, Genyue, Angela D. Evans, Lingfeng Wang, and Kang Lee. 2008. “Lying in the Name of the Collective Good: A Developmental Study.” Developmental Science 11: 495–503. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1967. “On Face-Work: An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction.” In Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-Face Behavior, 5–45. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, Vol 3: Speech Acts, ed. by Peter Cole, and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–48. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hart, Christian L., Jelisa M. Jones, John A. Terrizzi, and Drew A. Curtis. 2019. “Development of the Lying in Everyday Situations Scale.” The American Journal of Psychology 132 (3): 343–352. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, and Bruce Hardy. 2012. “What is Civil Engaged Argument and Why Does Aspiring to It Matter?” PS: Political Science & Politics 45 (3): 412–415. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jobert, Manuel, and Sorlin, Sandrine. 2018. “Introduction: The Intricacies of Irony and Banter.” In The Pragmatics of Irony and Banter, ed. by Manuel Jobert, and Sandrine Sorlin, 3–21. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jordan, Jillian J., Roseanna Sommers, Paul Bloom, and David G. Rand. 2017. “Why Do We Hate Hypocrites? Evidence for a Theory of False Signaling.” Psychological Science 28 (3): 356–368. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas H., and Irma Taavitsainen. 2000. “Diachronic Speech Act Analysis: Insults from Flyting to Flaming.” Journal of Historial Pragmatics 1 (1): 67–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kapust, Daniel J. 2018. Flattery and the History of Political Thought: That Glib and Oily Art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder. 1982. “On Hypocrisy.” Metaphilosophy 13 (3–4): 277–289. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Klein, Laurence E. 1989. “Liberty, Manners, and Politeness in Early Eighteenth-century England.” The Historical Journal 32 (3): 583–605. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreuz, Roger, Debra Long, and Mary Church. 1991. “On Being Ironic: Pragmatic and Mnemonic Implications.” Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 6: 149–162. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maillat, Didier. 2013. “Constraining Context Selection: On the Pragmatic Inevitability of Manipulation.” Journal of Pragmatics 59: 190–199. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McKinnon, Christine. 1991. “Hypocrisy, with a Note on Integrity.” American Philosophical Quarterly 28 (4): 321–330. [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mills, Sara. 2017. English Politeness and Class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Driscoll, Jim. 2020. Offensive Language: Taboo, Offence and Social Control. London: Bloomsbury. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Östman, Jan-Ola, and Jef Verschueren (founding eds). 1995. Handbook of Pragmatics. Available online since 2003. International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) Research Center. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Paternoster, Annick, and Susan Fitzmaurice (eds). 2019. Politeness in Nineteenth-century Europe. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richardson, Samuel. 2013[1740]. Pamela or Virtue Rewarded. London: Oxford World’s Classics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Riley, Denise. 2005. Impersonal Passion: Language as Affect. Durham & London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, David (ed). 1998. Lord Chesterfield’s Letters (1737–68). London: Oxford World’s Classics.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rockwell, Patricia Ann. 2006. Sarcasm and Other Mixed Messages: The Ambiguous Ways People Use Language. Lewinston: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Runciman, David. 2008. Political Hypocrisy: The Mask of Power from Hobbes to Orwell and Beyond. Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith. 1984. Ordinary Vices. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sifianou, Maria. 2023. “Dangerous Politeness? Understandings of Politeness in the Covid-19 Era and Beyond.” Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simpson, Paul. 2011. “‘That’s not Ironic, that’s just Stupid:’ Towards an Eclectic Account of the Discourse of Irony.” In The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains, ed. by Marta Dynel, 33–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sorlin, Sandrine. 2013. “The Power of Impoliteness: A Historical Perspective.” In Aspects of Linguistic Impoliteness, ed. by Denis Jamet, and Manuel Jobert, 45–58. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. Language and Manipulation in House of Cards: A Pragma-Stylistic Perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “The Pragmatics of Manipulation: Exploiting Im/politeness Theories.” Journal of Pragmatics 121: 132–146. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2005. “(Im)Politeness, Face and Perceptions of Rapport: Unpackaging their Bases and Interrelationships.” Journal of Politeness Research: Language, Behaviour, Culture 1 (1): 95–119. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Terkourafi, Marina. 2015. “Review of the Pragmatics of Politeness.” Language 91 (4): 957–960. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tomasello, Michael. 2014. A Natural History of Human Thinking. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Toplak, Mary, and Albert Katz. 2000. “On the Uses of Sarcastic Irony.” Journal of Pragmatics 32: 1467–1488. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef. 2022. Complicity in Discourse and Practice. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Virtanen, Tuija. 2013. “Performativity in Computer-Mediated Communication.” In Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication, ed. by Susan C. Herring, Dieter Stein, and Tuija Virtanen, 269–290. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Watts, Richard J. 2002. “From Polite to Educated Language: The Re-emergence of an Ideology.” In Alternatives Histories of English, ed. by Richard J. Watts, and Peter Trudgill, 155–172. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2003. Politeness: Key Topics in Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wieting, Stephen G. 2015. The Sociology of Hypocrisy: An Analysis of Sport and Religion. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth. 2020. The Politics of Fear: The Shameless Normalization of Far-Right Discourses. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wodak, Ruth, Jonathan Culpeper, and Elena Semino. 2021. “Shameless Normalisation of Impoliteness: Berlusconi’s and Trump’s press conferences.” Discourse & Society 32 (3): 369–393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Sorlin, Sandrine
2025. What pronouns do you use? The pronoun-sharing practice from an (im)politeness perspective. Journal of Politeness Research DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue