In:Self- and Other-Reference in Social Contexts: From global to local discourses
Edited by Minna Nevala and Minna Palander-Collin
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 342] 2024
► pp. 89–113
Chapter 5Self- and other-positioning in eighteenth‑century newspapers
A case study of a failed joint venture
Published online: 14 March 2024
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.342.05bos
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.342.05bos
Abstract
This study takes a sociopragmatic perspective on processes of self- and other-positioning in
eighteenth-century newspapers. A case study of the adversarial separation of Edward Topham and John Bell, the makers of the
highly successful newspaper The World, will reveal the complexities of indexical practices in negotiating
positions and responsibilities. Evidence of their feud was mainly found in Bell’s new paper, The Oracle,
which was launched in June 1789. Drawing on Reisigl and Wodak’s (2001) framework of
positive self- and negative other-presentation, this study particularly explores the referencing and predication strategies,
but also some of the perspectivation and argumentation strategies employed in a kaleidoscopic dataset including Bell’s
inaugural comment and a range of further newspaper genres. While the processes of positioning provide evidence of the
self-serving bias, i.e. “a tendency for people to take personal responsibility for their desirable outcomes yet externalize
responsibility for their undesirable outcomes” (cf. Shepperd et al. 2008: 895–896),
they were probably carefully planned with the formation of public opinion and marketing effects in mind.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Analytical framework
- 3.Historical contextualisation
- 4.Data: A kaleidoscopic set-up
- 5.Strategies of self- and other-positioning
- 5.1Self- and other-references in self- and other-positioning: The case of pronouns
- 5.2Reference and predication strategies in The Oracle
- 5.2.1Self-positioning: Bell/The Oracle
- 5.2.2Other-positioning: Edward Topham/The World
- 5.3Further strategies of self- and other-positioning
- 5.3.1Perspectivation
- 5.3.2Argumentation strategies
- 6.Discussion
- 7.Conclusion
Notes References
References (35)
Archer, Dawn. 2017. “Context
and Historical (Socio)Pragmatics Twenty Years on.” Journal of Historical
Pragmatics 18 (2): 315–336.
Baker, Paul, et al. 2008. “A
Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of
Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse and
Society 19 (3): 273–306.
Biber, Douglas, and Edward Finegan. 1997. “Diachronic
Relations among Speech-Based and Written Registers in
English.” In To Explain the Present. Studies in the Changing
English Language in Honour of Matti Rissanen, ed. by Terttu Nevalainen, and Leena Kahlas-Tarkka, 253–275. Helsinki: Société Néophilologique.
Bös, Birte. 2010. “Dialogic
Quotation Patterns in Historical News Reports.” In The
Language of Public and Private Communication in a Historical Perspective, ed.
by Nicholas Brownlees, Gabriella del Lungo, and John Denton, 228–244. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
. 2015. ““A
full Account of the rise, progress and declension of our Journal”: Negotiations of Failure in Early English
Newspapers.” In Fail better. Scheitern in der
frühen Neuzeit, ed. by Stefan Brakensiek, and Claudia Claridge, 11–37. Bielefeld: transcript.
. 2017. “Of
Hopes and Plans – Newsmakers’ Metadiscourse at the Dawn of the Newspaper
Age.” In Diachronic Developments in English News
Discourse, ed. by Minna Palander-Collin, Maura Ratia, and Irma Taavitsainen, 15–37. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 2021. “Contextualising
British Suffrage Newspapers.” In The Role of Context in the
Production and Reception of Historical News Discourse, ed. by Nicholas Brownlees, 155–177. Frankfurt/M.: Peter Lang.
Brownlees, Nicholas, and Birte Bös. 2023. “The
Evolving Language of the Press.” In The Edinburgh History of
the British and Irish Press, Vol. 1: 1640–1800, ed. by Nicholas Brownlees. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 195–215.
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall. 2005. “Identity
and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach.” Discourse
Studies 7 (4–5), 584–614.
Burney Collection of Newspapers, [URL].
Burnim, Kalman A., and Philip H. Highfill Jr. 1998. John
Bell, Patron of British Theatrical Portraiture. A Catalog of the Theatrical Portraits in His Editions of Bell’s
Shakespeare and Bell’s British
Theatre. Carbondale/Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.
Christie, Ian R. 1970. Myth and Reality in
Late-eighteenth-century British Politics: And Other
Papers. Berkeley/LA: University of California Press.
Clark, Herbert H., and Richard J. Gerrig. 1990. “Quotations
as
Demonstrations.” Language 66: 764–805.
Culpeper, Jonathan. 2009. “Historical
Sociopragmatics. An Introduction.” Journal of Historical
Pragmatics 10 (2): 179–186.
Davies, Bronwyn, and Rom Harré. 1990. “Positioning:
Discursive Construction of Selves.” Journal for the Theory of Social
Behaviour 20 (1): 43–63.
De Fina, Anna. 2013. “Discourse
and Identity” In The Encyclopedia of Applied
Linguistics, ed. by C. A. Chapelle, 1729–1735. London: Blackwell.
Hargreaves-Mawdsley, William Norman. 1967. The English Della
Cruscans and Their Time, 1783–1828. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Kleinke, Sonja, and Birte Bös. 2018. “Indeterminate
Us and Them: The Complexities of Referentiality, Identity and Group Construction in a Public Online
Discussion.” In The Discursive Construction of Identities On-
and Offline: Personal – Group – Collective, ed. by Birte Bös, et al., 153–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Meibauer, Jörg. 2012. “What
Is a Context? Theoretical and Empirical Evidence.” In What is
a Context? Linguistic Approaches and Challenges, ed. by Rita Finkbeiner, Jörg Meibauer, and Petra B. Schumacher, 9–32. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 1932. The
English Newspaper. Some Account of the Physical Development of Journals Printed in London between 1622 & the
Present Day. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nevala, Minna. 2009. “Altering
Distance and Defining Authority: Person Reference in Late Modern English.” Journal of
Historical
Pragmatics 10 (2): 238–259.
Oxford English Dictionary
Online. Oxford: Oxford University Press, September 2022, Web (last
accessed 13 October
2022).
Pahta, Päivi, Minna Palander-Collin, Minna Nevala, and Arja Nurmi. 2010. “Language
Practices in the Construction of Social Roles in Late Modern
English.” In Social Roles and Language Practices in Late
Modern English, ed. by Päivi Pahta, Minna Nevala, Arja Nurmi, and Minna Palander-Collin, 1–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Palander-Collin, Minna. 2009. “Variation
and Change in Patterns of Self-Reference in Early English Correspondence.” Journal of
Historical
Pragmatics 10 (2): 260–285.
Reisigl, Martin. 2017. “The
Discourse-Historical Approach.” In The Routledge Handbook of
Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by John Flowerdew, and John E. Richardson, 44–59. London: Routledge.
Shepperd, James, Wendi Malone, and Kate Sweeney. 2008. “Exploring
Causes of the Self-serving Bias.” Social and Personality Psychology
Compass 2 (2): 895–908.
