Cover not available

In:Language Change in the 20th Century: Exploring micro-diachronic evolutions in Romance languages
Edited by Salvador Pons Bordería and Shima Salameh Jiménez
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 340] 2024
► pp. 188–217

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 6
How are linguistic changes in the 20th century to be studied?

Sp. VOC-tío or merging sociolinguistic and philological explanations

 | University of Valencia
Published online: 5 January 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.340.06pon
Abstract
This paper analyzes the diffusion of linguistic change through a case study focusing on the adoption of tío as a vocative and discourse marker in the 1970s and 1980s. Two strands of research are used to explain this case: Firstly, Labov’s (2010) theory of diffusion in linguistic change is used to provide essential insights about the groups of speakers who initiate and promote such changes. Second, philological information is considered, encompassing factors beyond groups of speakers: the linguistic features of the constructions involved in a change, the historical context in which the change occurred, the associated social practices, the influence of specific locations (cities, neighborhoods), and also the impact of influential individuals in promoting one linguistic solution over another. It is only when both sets of information are brought together that the necessary and sufficient information about linguistic change can be achieved. The 20th century proves particularly suitable for conducting this type of research.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Sp. tío vs. Sp. macho: From address term to vocatives and DM: Two evolutions face to face
    • 2.1Sp. tío: Constructionalization in a nutshell
    • 2.2Stalled innovations: The rise and stagnation of macho
  • 3.Difussion is necessary: S-shaping tío
    • 3.1S-shaped adoption of innovations
    • 3.2Diffusion of tío across groups of speakers
      • 3.2.1Innovators: The Rrollo youngsters (ca. 1968–1973)
      • 3.2.2Early users: Rrollo followers (ca. 1974–1978)
      • 3.2.3An early majority: The Movida madrileña (approx. 1979–84)
      • 3.2.4Late majority and laggards
    • 3.3Transmission and permanence (1980 on)
  • 4.Difussion is not sufficient: Bringing new data into the picture
    • 4.1Structural factors
    • 4.2Historical factors (Transición)
    • 4.3Geographical factors (Madrid, Seville and Barcelona)
    • 4.4Social factors: Lifestyle and new practices
    • 4.5Cultural factors
      • 4.5.1Music
      • 4.5.2Comics and movies
      • 4.5.3Press and TV
    • 4.6The weight of the individual
      • 4.6.1Hoods (Vallekas)
      • 4.6.2Writers (Umbral)
    • 4.7A hypothetical reconstruction for the linguistic change?
  • 5.The study of linguistic change in the 20th century: A replicable approach?
  • Notes
  • References
References (61)
References
Beinhauer, Werner. 1929:1979. Colloquial Spanish. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blythe, Richard and William Croft. 2012. “S-curves and the mechanism of propagation in language change.” Language, 88(2), 269–304. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Briz, Antonio et al.. 1995. La conversación coloquial. Materiales para su estudio. Valencia, Universidad.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burgos, Antonio. 1977. “El lenguaje del Rrollo rockero.” Triunfo digital 769, 46–48.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Casado Velarde, Manuel. 1978. Lengua e ideología: estudio de Diario Libre. University of Navarra.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio. 1981. “La lengua funcional.” Lecciones de lingüística general. Madrid, Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Costa, Jordi. 2018. How to end the counterculture. Una historia subterránea de España. Madrid: Taurus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
[CORLEC] Marcos Marín, F. (dir.). Corpus Oral de Referencia de la Lengua Española Contemporánea (CORLEC). [URL]
[CORMA] Enghels, Renata, Fien De Latte, Linde Roels and Sanhe Tanghe. Oral Corpus of Madrid.
Croft, William. 2000. Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cueto, Juan 1979: “El castellano es una jerga”, El País Semanal, 135, 11–11-1979.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Latte, Fien and Enghels, Renata. 2018. The (socio)linguistic variation of the vocative in present-day Madrid Spanish. In Chauveau, J. P. and Goebl, H. (coords.). Travaux de Linguistique Romane – Sociolinguistique, dialectologie, variation. ÉliPhi: Strasbourg, 233–248.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Latte, Fien. In press. “Countercultural vocatives: paradigmatic changes and diffusion to current colloquial Spanish.”
Dopico, Pablo. 2011. Paper sputum. The Spanish underground comic strip. Arbor. Science, Thought and Culture 87, 169–181.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Enghels, Renata, Fiona de Latte and Linde Roels. 2020. “El Corpus Oral de Madrid (CORMA)materiales para el estudio (socio)lingüístico del español coloquial actual.” Zeitschrift für Katalanistik: Revista d’Estudis Catalans 33, 45–76.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. 1992. Discourse and social change. Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Feixà Pàmpols, Carles. 2004. Studies on youth cultures in Spain (1960–2003). Journal of Youth Studies 64, 9–28.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoyos Gonzalez, M. de. 1981. A variety in colloquial speech: the slang ‘cheli’. Cauce: Revista de filologia y su didáctica 4: 31–42.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jørgensen, A. M. 2008. Tío and tía as markers in the language of Madrid. In Olza Moreno, I.; Casado Velarde, M. and R. González Ruiz (eds.). Actas del XXXVII Simposio Internacional e la Sociedad Español de Lingüística (SEL). Pamplona: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Navarra, 387–396.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jørgensen, A. M. and Martínez López, J. A. 2010. Tronco/a used as a discourse marker in the youth language of Madrid. Romanica Stockholmiensia 26, 67–80.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2012. Vocatives in the youth language of Santiago de Chile and Madrid. In García, C. and Placencia, M. E. (eds.). Studies of pragmatic variation in Spanish. Buenos Aires: Editorial Dunken: 141–166.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William 1994. Principles of linguistic Change, vol. 1: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2001. Principles of linguistic Change. Vol. 2. Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008. «Quantitative reasoning in linguistics». Available at: <[URL]>.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. Principles of linguistic Change. Cognitive and cultural factors. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. “Te role of the Avant Garde in linguistic diffusion.” Language. Variation and Change 20, 1–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lázaro Carreter, F. 1979. A juvenile slang: ‘el cheli’. ABC, 14/10/1979: 118.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
León, Víctor. 1980. Diccionario de argot español. Madrid: Alianza.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Llopis Cardona, Ana and Montañez Mesas, Marta Pilar. 2020. Los marcadores apelativos en el español peninsular. En Hidalgo, A.; Cabedo, A. (eds.), Pragmática del español hablado: hacia nuevos horizontes. València: Universitat de València, 319–336.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Llopis Cardona, Ana and Salvador Pons Bordería. 2020. La gramaticalización de macho y tío/a como ciclo semántico-pragmático. CLAC, 151–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
López Serena, A. 2014. “De la oralidad fingida a la oralidad simuladora de realidad. Reflexiones en torno a la coloquialización del discurso como estrategia mediática.” Español actual: revista de español vivo, 102, 37–75.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milroy, James, and Lesley Milroy. 1985. Linguistic change, social network and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics 21.339. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milroy, L., & Milroy, J. (1992). Social network and social class: Toward an integrated sociolinguistic model. Language in Society, 21(1), 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milroy, Lesley, and James Milroy. 1992. “Social network and social class: Towards an integrated sociolinguistic model.” Language in Society 21, 1–26. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milroy, James (2000) Historical description and the ideology of the standard language. In Laura Wright (ed.) The Development of Standard English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 11-28.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moliner, M. 1967. Diccionario de uso del espanol. Madrid: Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moreno Fernández, Francisco. 1998. Principios de sociolingüística y sociología del lenguaje. Ariel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moreno, Manuel & Cuevas, Abel (2020). Todo era posible: revistas underground y de contracultura en España, 1968-1983. Libros Walden.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Moreno Fernández, Francisco 2009. Principles of sociolinguistics and sociology of language. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Navarro, Felipe; Sordo, Julen, 1979. Diccionario del pasota. Barcelona: Planeta.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Octavio de Toledo, Álvaro. 2014. Between grammaticalization, informational structure and discursive traditions: something more about “nada”. In Procesos de gramaticalización en la historia del español, ed. by José Luis Girón Alconchel, Daniel Moisés Sáez Rivera, 263–319.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oliver, Juan Manuel. 1983. Dictionary of slang. Madrid: Sena.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ordovás, Jesús. 1977. De qué va el Rrollo. Madrid: Ed. La Piqueta.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pons Bordería, S. 2014. El siglo XX como diacronía: intuición y comprobación en el caso de “o esa”. Rilce. Revista de Filología Hispánica, 30(3), 985–1016.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pons Bordería, S. y Llopis Cardona, A. 2020. Some reflections on semantic-pragmatic cycles. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 21, 31–346. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Postma, G. 2010. “The impact of failed changes,” in Continuity and Change in Grammar, ed. A. Breitbarth, C. Lucas, S. Watts, and D. Willis (eds.), Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 269–302. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Royal Spanish Academy. 1739. Diccionario de Autoridades. Madrid: Real Academia Espanola.
Ribas Sanpons, José. 2007. Los 70 a piecjo: Ajoblanco y libertad. Barcelona: RBA.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rodríguez González, Félix. 2002. “Lenguaje y contracultura juvenil: anatomía de una generación.” In El lenguaje de los jóvenes, ed. by Félix Rodríguez, 29–56. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rodríguez Méndez, José María. Los quinquis de Madriz [1967] 2005. Selected theater. Volume I. Madrid: Asociación de autores de Teatro. 421–488.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rogers, Everett M. 2003. Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schützler, Ole. 2020. Frequency changes and stylistic levelling of though in diachronic and synchronic varieties of English–linguistic democratisation?. Language Sciences, 2020, vol. 79, p. 101-266.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosemeyer, Malte. 2016. “The development of iterative verbal periphrases in Romance.” Linguistics 54.2, 235–272. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sanmartín Sáez, Julia. 1997. El argot de la delincuencia (investigación en el establecimiento penitenciario de Valencia). Universitat de València. Tesis doctoral.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roszak, Theodore. 1970. The birth of a counterculture: reflections on technocratic society and its youthful opposition. Barcelona: Kairós.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tovar Llorente, Antonio. 1968. Latin of Hispania. Lexical aspects of Romanization. Reception speech at the Real Academia. Madrid: Real Academia Española.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Umbral, Francisco. 1972. Spleen de Madrid. Madrid: Organización Sala Editorial.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1978. Diario de un snob 2. Madrid: Titivillus.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1983. Diccionario cheli. Barcelona: Grijalbo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
[VAL.ES.CO. 2002] Briz, Antonio and Grupo Val.Es.Co. 2002. Corpus of colloquial conversations. València: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universitat de València.
Vázquez Carranza, Ariel 2020. Saludos y despedidas: tipología y contraste entre datos intuitivos y observacionales. Pragmática sociocultural 8, 2, 182–203. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Pons Bordería, Salvador
2025. Humor as a Structure-Creating Mechanism: A Case of Recent Diachrony in Contemporary Spanish. Languages 10:10 ► pp. 263 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue