Cover not available

In:Language Change in the 20th Century: Exploring micro-diachronic evolutions in Romance languages
Edited by Salvador Pons Bordería and Shima Salameh Jiménez
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 340] 2024
► pp. 120–157

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 4
Diatopic variation as evidence for diachronic changes in the 20th and 21st centuries

The pragmatic markers tipo, onda and como

 | Tübingen University
 | Tübingen University
Published online: 5 January 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.340.04mih
Abstract
In Latin American varieties of Spanish there is a series of pragmatic markers that fulfil similar functions. Tipo, onda and como are mitigators, but they also express approximation, exemplification, focalisation, discourse structuring and quotation. Pragmatic functions arise in the 20th century, although approximating como goes back to Old Spanish. Corpus data, metalinguistic comments and cross-linguistic observations point to the countercultures of the 20th century as a probable trigger leading to pragmaticalisation. We propose a comparative study of acceptability judgements of the three markers in their Argentinian and Mexican varieties, contributing to a semantic map showing different stages of pragmaticalisation which, combined with other data, offers insights into diachronic processes that emerged in the 20th century.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: The pragmatic markers tipo, onda and como
  • 2.Sources of the pragmatic functions
    • 2.1Como – from comparison marker to pragmatic marker
    • 2.2Tipo – from taxonomic noun to comparison marker
    • 2.3Onda – from ‘vibes’ to pragmatic marker
  • 3.Diatopic variation and semantic maps as diachronic evidence
    • 3.1Semantic maps as a heuristic for visualising diachronic tendencies
    • 3.2A semantic map of approximation, mitigation, discourse structuring
  • 4.Evidence for a timeline for the diachrony of tipo, onda and como
    • 4.1General remarks on real-time and apparent-time data
    • 4.2Lexicographic data
    • 4.3Corpus data
    • 4.4Metalinguistic comments
    • 4.5A note on countercultures of the 20th century as linguistic turning points
    • 4.6Cross-linguistic evidence
  • 5.Acceptability judgements as evidence for diachronic processes
    • 5.1General remarks and earlier studies
    • 5.2An acceptability judgement study of tipo, onda and como in Argentina and Mexico
    • 5.3General results
    • 5.4Early stages of pragmaticalisation: From comparison to approximation and mitigation
    • 5.5The right periphery of the semantic map: Focalisation and structuring functions
    • 5.6The special case of rounder uses
    • 5.7Discussion
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
References (87)
References
Agustín, José. 2001. La Contracultura en México. México: Grijalbo Mondadori.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. “La Onda que Nunca Existió.” Revista de Crítica Literaria Latinoamericana 30(59): 9–17. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aijmer, Karin, and Anne-Marie Simon-Vandenbergen. 2004. “A model and a methodology for the study of pragmatic markers: the semantic field of expectation.” Journal of Pragmatics 36(10): 1781–1805. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beeching, Kate. 2023. “Sociopragmatic variation, sort of and genre in English and French.” In Type Noun Constructions in Slavic, Germanic and Romance Languages – Semantics and pragmatics on the move, ed. by Wiltrud Mihatsch, Lieselotte Brems, Kristin Davidse, Inga Hennecke, Alena Kolyaseva, and Anna Kisiel, 695–721. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bittencourt, Vanda de Oliveira. 2000. “Tipo (assim) como delimitador de unidades de informação.” Estudos Lingüísticos, 29: 264–269.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bregant, Lucía. 2019. “Marcadores de Reformulación en Adolescentes Bonaerenses.” In Estudios SAEL 2019, ed. by Dora Riestra, and Nora Múgica, 9–22. Bahía Blanca: Ediuns y SAEL.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Camacho, José. 2003. The coarse structure of the center periphery [Unpublished manuscript]. Rutgers University. Retrieved March 3, 2023 from [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cano Aguilar, Rafael. 1995. Sintaxis histórica de la comparación en español: La historia de “como”. Sevilla: Universidad de Sevilla.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cantilo, Miguel. 2000. ¡Chau Loco! Los Hippies en la Argentina de los Setenta. Buenos Aires: Galerna.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
CDH = Instituto de Investigación Rafael Lapesa de la Real Academia Española. 2013. Corpus del Nuevo Diccionario Histórico del Español (CDH). Real Academia Española. Retrieved March 3, 2023 from [URL]
COLA = Jørgensen, Annette Myre and Esperanza Eguía Padilla. 2018. Corpus Oral de Lenguaje Adolescente (COLA). Retrieved March 3, 2023 from [URL]
C-ORAL-ROM = Cresti, Emanuela and Massimo Moneglia. 2005. C-ORAL-ROM: Integrated reference corpora for spoken Romance languages. CD-ROM. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
CORPES = Real Academia Española. 2021. Banco de datos (CORPES) Corpus del Español del Siglo XXI. Retrieved March 3, 2023 from [URL]
Chevalier, Gisèle. 2001. “Comment comme fonctionne d’une génération à l’autre.” Revue québécoise de linguistique 30(2): 13–40. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dalzell, Tom, and Terry Victor. 2015. The Concise New Partridge Dictionary of Slang and Unconventional English. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DAMER = Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española. 2010. Diccionario De Americanismos. Retrieved March 3, 2023 from [URL]
DLE = Real Academia Española. 2014. Diccionario de la lengua española. Retrieved January 01, 2020 from [URL]
Eckert, Penelope. 1997. “Age as a Sociolinguistic Variable.” In Handbook of Sociolinguistics, ed. by Florian Coulmas, 151–167. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fernández, Julieta. 2017. “The Language Functions of tipo in Argentine Vernacular.” Journal of Pragmatics 114: 87–103. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne, and Marina Yaguello. 2004. “Discourse markers across languages? Evidence from English and French.” In Discourse across languages and cultures, ed. by Carol Lynn Moder, and Aida Martinovic-Zic, 129–147. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fridell, Staffan. 1993. “Nya typtyper.” Språkvård 1: 25–26.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
García Marcos, Francisco Joaquín, and Antonio J. Manjón-Cabeza Cruz. 1993. “Teoría sintáctica y cambio sociolingüístico (a propósito de los nuevos usos de “como” en español).” Docencia e Investigación: revista de la Escuela Universitaria de Magisterio de Toledo 18(3): 35–59.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2003. “The Geometry of Grammatical Meaning: Semantic Maps and Cross-linguistic Comparison.” In The New Psychology of Language, vol. 2, ed. by Michael Tomasello, 211–242. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hasund, Ingrid Kristine, Toril Opsahl and Jan Svennevig. 2012. “By three means. The pragmatic functions of three Norwegian quotatives.” In Quotatives: Cross-linguistic and cross-disciplinary perspectives [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 15], ed. by Isabelle Buchstaller, and Ingrid van Alphen, 37–68. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hennecke, Inga. 2014. Pragmatic markers in Manitoban French: a corpuslinguistic and psycholinguistic investigation of language change [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Ruhr-Universität Bochum. Retrieved March 3, 2023 from [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmvik, Lise. 2011. Como usado como marcador del discurso en el lenguaje juvenil de Madrid [Master’s thesis, The University of Bergen]. Bergen Open Research Archive.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huseby, Stine. 2010. Las funciones de tipo como marcador del discurso en el lenguaje juvenil de Buenos Aires: Un estudio descriptivo. [Master’s thesis, The University of Bergen]. Bergen Open Research Archive.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Isambert, Paul. 2016. “Genre: une mode récente mais qui vient de loin.” Journal of French Language Studies 26: 85–96. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Janebová, Markéta, Michaela Martinkova and Volker Gast. 2023. “Czech type nouns: Evidence from corpora.” In Type Noun Constructions in Slavic, Germanic and Romance Languages – Semantics and pragmatics on the move, ed. by Wiltrud Mihatsch, Lieselotte Brems, Kristin Davidse, Inga Hennecke, Alena Kolyaseva, and Anna Kisiel, 571–617. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jørgensen, Annette Myre, and Anna-Brita Stenström. 2009. “Dos marcadores pragmáticos contrastados en el lenguaje juvenil: el inglés like y el español como.” Español Actual 92: 103–122.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jørgensen, Annette Myre. 2009. “En plan used as a hedge in Spanish teenage language.” In Youngspeak in a multilingual perspective, ed. by Anna-Brita Stenström, and Annette Myre Jørgensen, 95–115. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kern, Joseph. 2014. “Como in commute: The travels of a discourse marker across languages.” Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 7(2): 275–297. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kisiel, Anna, and Alena Kolyaseva. 2023. “Towards a comprehensive typology of type noun constructions in Slavic languages, with a special focus on Polish and Russian.” In Type Noun Constructions in Slavic, Germanic and Romance Languages – Semantics and pragmatics on the move, ed. by Wiltrud Mihatsch, Lieselotte Brems, Kristin Davidse, Inga Hennecke, Alena Kolyaseva, and Anna Kisiel, 501–544. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kolyaseva, Alena, and Kristin Davidse. 2018. “A typology of lexical and grammaticalized uses of Russian tip, tipa, po tipu.” Russian linguistics 42 (2): 191–220. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kornfeld, Laura. 2013. “Atenuadores en la Lengua Coloquial Argentina.” Lingüística 29(2): 17–49.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kraushaar, Wolfgang. 2018. Die 68er-Bewegung International. Eine Illustrierte Chronik 1960–1969, vol. 1–4. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change: Internal Factors, Vol. 1. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lapteva, Olga. 1983. “Tipa ili vrode? [Tipa or vrode?]. Voprosy jazykoznanija.” Topics in the Study of Language 1:39–51.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Leech, Geoffrey. 2014. “Growth and Decline: How Grammar has Been Changing in Recent English.” In Major Trends in Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, ed. by Nikolaos Lavidas, Thomaï Alexiou, and Areti Sougari, 47–66. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lima Hernandes, Maria Célia. 2005. A interface sociolingüística/gramaticalização: estratificação de usos de tipo, feito, igual e como – sincronia e diacronia [Doctoral dissertation, Instituto de Estudos da Linguagem da Universidade Estadual de Campinas]. Unicamp.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maddeaux, Ruth, and Aaron Dinkin. 2017. “Is like like like?: Evaluating the same variant across multiple variables.” Linguistics Vanguard 3(1): 20150032. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marques, Maria Aldina. 2023. “Pragmatic functions and contexts of use of tipo in European Portuguese.” In Type Noun Constructions in Slavic, Germanic, and Romance Languages – Semantics and pragmatics on the move, ed. by Wiltrud Mihatsch, Lieselotte Brems, Kristin Davidse, Inga Hennecke, Alena Kolyaseva, and Anna Kisiel, 393–414. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mihatsch, Wiltrud. 2010a. Wird man von Hustensaft wie so ne art bekifft?“ Approximationsmarker in romanischen Sprachen. Frankfurt am Main: KlostermannGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020b. “Los orígenes discursivos de los atenuadores procedimentalizados tipo, onda, corte y rollo: Una exploración microdiacrónica.” Revista Signos 53(104): 686–717. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010b. “The diachrony of rounders and adaptors: Approximation and unidirectional change.” In New approaches to Hedging, ed. by Gunther Kaltenböck, Wiltrud Mihatsch, and Stefan Schneider, 93–122. Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “Sincronía y diacronía del aproximador como.” Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana (RILI) 16: 175–201.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. “From ad hoc category to ad hoc categorization: The proceduralization of Argentinian Spanish tipo.” Folia Linguistica 52(s39-s1): 147–176. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020a. “A Semantic-map Approach to Pragmatic Markers: the Complex Approximation / Mitigation / Quotation / Focus Marking. (Peninsular Spanish (tipo, así, como) and European Portuguese (tipo, assim, como) Based on a Corpus Analysis of C-ORAL-ROM).” In O Português como Referência Contrastiva, ed. by Isabel M. Oliveira Duarte and Rogelio Ponce de Léon Romeo, 137–162. Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. “French type-noun constructions based on genre: From the creation of ad hoc categories to ad hoc categorization.” In Building categories in interaction: linguistic resources at work, ed. by Caterina Mauri, Ilaria Fiorentini and Eugenio Goria, 373–414. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2023a. “A panoramic overview of the extended uses of taxonomic nouns.” In Type Noun Constructions in Slavic, Germanic and Romance Languages – Semantics and pragmatics on the move, ed. by Wiltrud Mihatsch, Lieselotte Brems, Kristin Davidse, Inga Hennecke, Alena Kolyaseva, and Anna Kisiel, 1–52. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2023b. “General introduction: Taxonomic nouns and their derived functions in Germanic, Romance and Slavic languages.” In Type Noun Constructions in Slavic, Germanic and Romance Languages – Semantics and pragmatics on the move, ed. by Wiltrud Mihatsch, Lieselotte Brems, Kristin Davidse, Inga Hennecke, Alena Kolyaseva, and Anna Kisiel, 245–310. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mihatsch, Wiltrud and Ana Vazeilles. In press. “Culturas juveniles como catalizador de la pragmaticalización de los marcadores tipo y onda en Argentina y México. Un estudio basado en comentarios metalingüísticos.” Spanish in Context.
Miller, Jim and Regina Weinert. 1995. “The function of like in dialogue.” Journal of Pragmatics 23: 365–393. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mondaca Becerra, Lissette. 2019. “Aproximadores y atenuadores en el español de Chile: el caso de como y como que.” Textos en Proceso, 5(1): 29-52. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. “Aproximación al Estudio de las Funciones Pragmáticas y a la Atenuación en la Partícula onda en el Español de Chile.” Revista Signos 53: 718–743. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Montes, José Joaquín. 1980–1981. “Sobre el como de atenuación.” Boletín de Filología de la Universidad de Chile 31: 667–675.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Niedzielski, Nancy A. and Dennis R. Preston. 2003. Folk Linguistics. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
NURC = Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Faculdade de Letras (n.d.). NURC RJ (Projeto da Norma Urbana Oral Culta do Rio de Janeiro). Retrieved March 3, 2023 from [URL]
Odden, Oda Røste. 2019. North Scandinavian type noun constructions: Patterns with slags, SORTs and TYP(E). [Doctoral dissertation, University of Oslo].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
OED = Oxford English Dictionary. (n.d.). Retrieved March 3, 2023 from [URL]
Palacios, Patricia. 2020. Clase, Similitud y Vaguedad en ‚tipo‘ y ‚como‘. Outline of PhD-thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Querétaro.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Panussis-Lyon, Constanza, and Abelardo San Martín-Núñez. 2017. “Como (que) y sus funciones discursivas en el habla santiaguina: análisis pragmático sociolingüístico.” Revista de Lingüística Teórica y Aplicada 55 (2): 39–61. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pons Bordería, Salvador and Ana Llopis Cardona. 2020. “Some reflections on semantic-pragmatic cycles.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 21 (2): 315–346. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pons Bordería, Salvador. 2014. “El Siglo XX como Diacronía: Intuición y Comprobación en el Caso de o sea.” RILCE 30(3): 985–1016. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Popescu, Cecilia-Mihaela and Alice Ionescu. 2019. “Étude comparative des marqueurs métadiscursifs gen du roumain et genre du français. Distribution et valeurs pragmatiques.” Studii de lingvistică 9(2): 93–112.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 1996. “Whaddayaknow: The Modes of Folk Linguistic Awareness.” Language Awareness 5(1): 40–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rojas Inostroza, Cristian, Alejandra Rubio Núñez, Abelardo San Martín Núñez and Silvana Guerrero González. 2012. “Análisis Pragmático y Sociolingüístico de los Marcadores Discursivos de Reformulación en el Habla de Santiago de Chile.” Lenguas Modernas 40: 103–123.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rosenkvist, Henrik and Sanna Skärlund. 2013. Grammaticalization in the present: The changes of modern Swedish typ. In Synchrony and diachrony: A dynamic interface, ed. by Anna Giacalone Ramat, Caterina Mauri, and Piera Molinelli, 313–338. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. . Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roszak, Theodore. 1973. El Nacimiento de una Contracultura: Reflexiones Sobre la Sociedad Tecnocrática y su Oposición Juvenil. Barcelona: Kairós.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Said-Mohand, Aixa. 2008. “Aproximación sociolingüística al uso del marcador del discurso como.” Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana 6(2): 71–93.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
San Martín Núñez, Abelardo. 2017. “Análisis Sociolingüístico de los Reformuladores de Explicación en el Español Hablado de Santiago de Chile.” Revista Signos 50: 124–147. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian. 2006. “Age: Apparent Time and Real Time.” In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, ed. by K. Brown, 110–116. Oxford: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scharloth, Joachim. 2008. “Kommunikationsguerilla 1968. Strategien der Subversion symbolischer Ordnung in der Studentenbewegung.” In Musikulturen in der Revolte, ed. by Beate Kutschke, 187–196. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. 1968. Eine Kommunikationsgeschichte. Paderborn: Fink. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schumann, Kathleen. 2021. Der Fokusmarker‚ so‘. Berlin: De Gruyter. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Silva Teixeira, Cristiana Filipa, Elisabete Pinto Ribeiro, and Sara Raquel da Silva Salgado. 2016. “Marcadores discursivos na oralidade.” Revista eletrónica de Linguística dos estudantes da Universidade do Porto 5.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Terian, Simina-Maria. 2018. “(Inter)subiectificare şi gramaticalizare: gen în limba română contemporană.” Transilvania review 11–12: 129–134.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Velando Casanova, Mónica. 2005. Las estructuras comparativas con como en la crónica medieval: De Alfonso X a López de Ayala. Castelló de la Plana: Universitat Jaume I..Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Voghera, Miriam. 2023. “The network of specie, genere, sorta, tipo constructions: From lexical features to discursive functions.” In Type Noun Constructions in Slavic, Germanic and Romance Languages – Semantics and pragmatics on the move, ed. by Wiltrud Mihatsch, Lieselotte Brems, Kristin Davidse, Inga Hennecke, Alena Kolyaseva, and Anna Kisiel, 351–392. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wiese, Heike. 2011. “So as a focus marker in German.” Linguistics 49(5): 991–1039. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zafiu, Rodica. 2001. “Tip şi gen.” România literară 12. Retrieved March 3, 2023 from [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zolov, Eric. 1999. Refried Elvis: The Rise of the Mexican Counterculture. Berkley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwicky, Arnold. 2007. “The Word: Recency Illusion.” New Scientist 196(2630): 60. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Mihatsch, Wiltrud & Ana Vazeilles
2024. Culturas juveniles como catalizador de la pragmaticalización de los marcadores tipo y onda en Argentina y México. Spanish in Context 21:1 ► pp. 132 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue