Cover not available

In:Language Change in the 20th Century: Exploring micro-diachronic evolutions in Romance languages
Edited by Salvador Pons Bordería and Shima Salameh Jiménez
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 340] 2024
► pp. 1–16

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

From synchrony to diachrony

The study of the 20th century as a distinct place for language change

 | University of Valencia / Val.Es.Co. Research Group
 | Complutense University of Madrid / Val.Es.Co. Research Group
Published online: 5 January 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.340.00pon
Article outline
  • 1.Turning synchrony into diachrony: Toward the linguistic study of the 20th century
    • 1.1Language change in the 20th century: Why
    • 1.2New data for the diachronic study of the 20th century
    • 1.3New methods for linguistic research in the 20th century
    • 1.4Language change processes and main topics to be explored in the 20th century: An overview
    • 1.5Outline of chapters and future research
  • Notes
  • References
References (46)
References
Biber, Douglas. 1992. “The Multi-Dimensional Approach to Linguistic Analyses of Genre Variation: An Overview of Methodology and Findings.” Computers and the Humanities, 26 (5), 331–345. Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Briz, Antonio & Grupo Val.Es.Co. 1995. La conversación coloquial: materiales para su estudio. Universitat de València.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Variación pragmática y coloquialización estratégica. El caso de algunos géneros televisivos (la tertulia).” In C. Fuentes (Ed.), (Des)cortesía para el espectáculo: estudios de pragmática variacionista (pp. 89–125). Arco Libros.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cano Aguilar, Rafael. 1988. El español a través de los tiempos. Madrid, Arco Libros.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cortés Rodríguez, Luis. 1994. Tendencias actuales en el estudio del español hablado. Universidad de Almería.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio. 1958. Sincronía, diacronía e historia. Universidad de la República, Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias, Montevideo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Estellés Arguedas, María. 2020. “The Evolution of Parliamentary Debates in Light of the Evolution of Evidentials: Al Parecer and Por lo Visto in 40 Years of Parliamentary Proceedings from Spain.” Corpus Pragmatics, 4, 59–82. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles A. 1983. “Sports Announcer Talk: Syntactic Aspects of Register Variation.” Language in Society, 12, 2, 153–172. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
​​Fraser, Bruce. 1988. “Types of English discourse markers.” Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 38 (1–4), 19–33.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fraser, Bruce. 2009. “An account of discourse markers.” International Review of Pragmatics, 1, 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garachana, Mar. 2008. “En los límites de la gramaticalización. La evolución de encima (de que) como marcador del discurso.” Revista de Filología Española, 88, 1, 7–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. La evolución de ir a + inf en zonas de contacto lingüístico. El caso del español de Barcelona. In A. Palacios & M. S. Paraíso (Eds.). Dinámicas lingüísticas de las situaciones de contacto. De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gross, Alan. G, Joseph E. Harmon & Michel S. Reidy. 2002. Communicating Science. The scientific article from the 17th century to the present. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gómez Capuz, Juan. 2005. La inmigración léxica, Madrid, Arco/LibrosGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Guereña, Jean Louis. 2007. La pedagogía por la imagen. Los manuales de urbanidad españoles en el siglo XIX y a principios del siglo XX. J.L. Guereña (coord.). Image et transmission des savoirs dans les mondes hispaniques et hispano-américains. Université François Rabelais. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haselow, Alexander. 2011. “Discourse particle and modal particle: The functions of utterance final then in spoken English.” Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 3603–3623. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hiltunen, Turo, Jenni Räikkönen & Jukka Tyrkkö. 2020. “Investigating colloquialization in the British parliamentary record in the late 19th and early 20th century.” Language Sciences, 79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Itkonen, Esa. 2008. The central role of normativity in language and linguistics. The shared mind / coord. por Jordan Zlatev, Timothy P. Racine, Chris Sinha, Esa Itkonen, pp. 279-306.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas & Inma Taavitsainen (Eds.). 2003. Diachronic perspectives on Address Term Systems. Pragmatics & Beyond. John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jucker, Andreas. 2020. Politeness in the History of English – From the Middle Ages to the Present Day. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lapesa, Rafael. 1977. Tendencias y problemas actuales de la lingüística española. Comunicación y lenguaje, pp. 203-230.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1994. Principles of linguistic change. Volume I: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Llopis-Cardona, Ana & Salvador Pons Bordería. 2020. “La gramaticalización de macho y tío/a como ciclo semántico-pragmático.” Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 82, 151–164. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
López Serena, Araceli. 2007. Oralidad y escrituralidad en la recreación literaria del español coloquial. Madrid, Gredos.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. La lingüística como ciencia humana. Una incursión desde la filosofía de la ciencia. Madrid, Arco Libros.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022. “International diffusion of the discourse traditions model.” E. Winter & Á. Octavio de Toledo (Eds.). Manual of Discourse Traditions in Romance. De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Loureiro-Porto, Lucía & Turo Hiltunen. 2020. Democratization and Gender-neutrality in English(es). Journal of English Linguistics, 48(3), 215–232. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martín Butragueño, Pedro; Lastra, Yolanda (coords.) 2011. Corpus sociolingüístico de la Ciudad de México (CSCM). 1a. ed. Ciudad de México: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maldonado, R. 2021. Corpus AMERESCO Ciudad de México. Universidad de Valencia (Albelda y Estellés Coords). [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martín Zorraquino, María Antonia & José Portolés Lázaro. 1999. “Los marcadores del discurso.” In V. Demonte & I. Bosque (Eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (pp. 4051–4214). Espasa Calpe.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Melis, Chantal, Marcela Flores & Sergio Bogard. 2003. “La historia del español. Propuesta de un tercer período evolutivo.” Nueva Revista de Filología Hispánica 51, 1–56. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Narbona, Antonio. 1989. Sintaxis española: viejos y nuevos enfoques. Ariel España.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Octavio de Toledo, Álvaro. 2018. “Incorruptibles curvas: apuntes sobre la difusión de los cambios morfosintácticos.” M. Candelas & F. Gherardi (Eds.). Amor constante: Quevedo más allá de la muerte. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Servei de Publicacions.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pérez Salazar, Carmela. 2004. “Marcadores discursivos en cartas privadas del siglo XIX.” Boletín de la Real Academia Española, 84, 289, 105–130.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pons Bordería, Salvador. 2014. “El siglo XX como diacronía: intuición y comprobación en el caso de ‘o sea’.” RILCE: Revista de Filología Hispánica, 30, 3, 985–1016. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. “Introduction: New Insights in Grammaticalization Studies.” S. Pons & Ó. Loureda (Eds.). Beyond Grammaticalization and Discourse Markers: New Issues in the Study of Language Change. Brill, 1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. In press. “Del corpus Val.Es.Co. 3.0. a los futuros corpus diacrónicos orales: perspectivas de futuro.” Scriptum Digital.
Ramírez Luengo, José Luis (Ed.) 2012. Por sendas ignoradas. Estudios sobre el español del siglo XIX (Colección Iberia, 1), Lugo, Axac.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Salameh, Shima. 2022. Sobre la dada en pragmàtica experimental: el cas de l’eye-tracker i la reformulació en espanyol peninsular. Anuari De Filologia. Estudis De Lingüística, 12, 295–318. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2022. “Pues eso y su desarrollo como construcción en español peninsular: una propuesta de análisis desde el modelo Val.Es.Co..” DISROM 7. Craiova, 16–18th June, 2022.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scivoletto, Giulio. 2022. “Ripensare l’intersoggettificazione tramite l’evoluzione dei marcatori del discorso in siciliano.” Cuadernos de Filología Italiana.Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 253–288. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tanghe, Sanne. 2016. Marcadores derivados de verbos de movimiento. Una aproximación cognitiva a su polifuncionalidad. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie, 408. De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth-Closs & Graeme Trousdale. 2013. Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wischer, Ilse. 2011. Grammaticalization and Word formation. B. Heine & N. Harrog (Eds.). The Handbook of Grammaticalization (pp. 356–364). Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zamorano Aguilar, Alfonso (Ed.). 2012. Reflexión lingüística y lengua en la España del XIX. Marcos, panoramas y nuevas aportaciones. München: LINCOM.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Posio, Pekka & Malte Rosemeyer
2024. Dialogical and monological functions of the discourse marker bueno in spoken and written Spanish. Linguistics DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue