Cover not available

In:Manufacturing Dissent: Manipulation and counter-manipulation in times of crisis
Edited by Cornelia Ilie
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 339] 2024
► pp. 215–239

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 7
News media’s epistemological framings of the Covid-19 ‘lab leak’ hypothesis

A contrastive metapragmatic analysis of ‘conspiracy theory’

 | Ming Chuan University
Published online: 17 January 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.339.07des
Abstract
Despite a continuing lack of conclusive evidence on the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic, there has been a reassessment of the likelihood of various explanations, including the ‘lab leak’ hypothesis. This chapter analyses selected UK, US, and Chinese media articles’ usage of ‘conspiracy theory’ in relation to the lab leak hypothesis. It argues that the concept’s use was inseparable from local political contexts, as well as mainly metapragmatic: Chinese media’s use of the concept is contradictory under an orthodox definition, while UK/US media explicitly characterize it as a description of certain discourses, rather than indicating the factual likelihood of a hypothesis. The chapter argues that the implication of ‘conspiracy theory’ in metapragmatics makes it particularly vulnerable to (counter-)manipulation strategies.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background: Geopolitics and the unknown origins of Covid-19
  • 3.Theoretical notions
    • 3.1Orthodox views of ‘conspiracy theory’
    • 3.2‘Conspiracy theory’ and metapragmatics
  • 4.Methodology
  • 5.‘Conspiracy theory’ in news reporting on the lab leak theory
    • 5.1The Global Times: ‘Conspiracy theory’ as a metapragmatic label
    • 5.2The Global Times: Absence of ‘conspiracy theory’ as a description of US lab leak hypotheses
    • 5.3UK/US media: Linking the lab leak hypothesis to specific social groups
    • 5.4UK/US media in 2021: A retrospective, meta-metapragmatic analysis of the lab leak hypothesis as ‘conspiracy theory’
  • 6.Conclusion and implications
  • References
References (53)
References
Agha, Asif. 2007. Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Angermuller, Johannes. 2022. “Beyond discourse theory in the conspiratorial mode? The critical issue of truth in the age of post-truth.” In Conspiracy Theory Discourses, edited by Massimiliano Demata, Virginia Zorzi and Angela Zottola, 489–494. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Barnhill, Anne. 2022. “How philosophy might contribute to the practical ethics of online manipulation.” In The Philosophy of Online Manipulation, edited by Fleur Jongepier and Michael Klenk, 49–71. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Basham, Lee. 2018. “Joining the conspiracy.” Argumenta 3 (2): 271–290.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Birchall, Clare. 2001. “Conspiracy theories and academic discourses: The necessary possibility of popular (over)interpretation.” Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies 15 (1): 67–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bjerg, Ole, and Thomas Presskorn-Thygesen. 2016. “Conspiracy theory: Truth claim or language game?” Theory, Culture & Society 34 (1): 137–159. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bloom, Jesse D., Yujia Alina Chan, Ralph S. Baric, Pamela J. Bjorkman, Sarah Cobey, Benjamin E. Deverman, David N. Fisman, Ravindra Gupta, Akiko Iwasaki, Marc Lipsitch, Ruslan Medzhitov, Richard A. Neher, Rasmus Nielsen, Nick Patterson, Tim Stearns, Erik van Nimwegen, Michael Worobey, and David A. Relman. 2021, May 14. “Investigate the origins of Covid-19.” Science 372 (6543): 694. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bridges, Judith. 2017. “Gendering metapragmatics in online discourse: ‘Mansplaining man gonna mansplain …’.” Discourse, Context & Media 20: 94–102. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bucholtz, Mary, and Kira Hall. 2005. “Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach.” Discourse Studies 7 (4–5): 585–614. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Calisher, Charles, Dennis Carroll, Rita Colwell, Ronald B. Corley, Peter Daszak, Christian Drosten, Luis Enjuanes, Jeremy Farrar, Hume Field, Josie Golding, Alexander Gorbalenya, Bart Haagmans, James M. Hughes, William B. Karesh, Gerald T. Keusch, Sai Kit Lam, Juan Lubroth, John S. Mackenzie, Larry Madoff, Jonna Mazet, Peter Palese, Stanley Perlman, Leo Poon, Bernard Roizman, Linda Saif, Kanta Subbarao, and Mike Turner. 2020. “Statement in support of the scientists, public health professionals, and medical professionals of China combatting Covid-19.” The Lancet 395: e42–e43. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Catenaccio, Paola. 2022. “A corpus-driven exploration of conspiracy theorising as a discourse type: Lexical indicators of argumentative patterning.” In Conspiracy Theory Discourses, edited by Massimiliano Demata, Virginia Zorzi and Angela Zottola, 25–47. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chan, Alina, and Matt Ridley. 2021. Viral: The Search for the Origin of Covid-19. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cheng, Maria. 2021, August 13. “WHO expert ‘had concerns’ about lab close to 1st COVID cases.” AP News, 2021, August 13. [URL].
Demata, Massimiliano, Virginia Zorzi, and Angela Zottola, eds. 2022. Conspiracy Theory Discourses. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dentith, Matthew R. X. 2014. The Philosophy of Conspiracy Theories. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave McMillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deschrijver, Cedric. 2020. “Metalinguistic density as an indicator of sharedness: The case of economic and financial terms in online interaction.” Language & Communication 71: 123–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. “On the metapragmatics of ‘conspiracy theory’: Scepticism and epistemological debates in online conspiracy comments.” Journal of Pragmatics 182: 310–321. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eban, Katherine. 2021, Jun 3. “The lab-leak theory: Inside the fight to uncover Covid-19’s origins.” Vanity Fair, 2021, Jun 3. [URL].
Fish, Eric. 2017, April 28. “China’s angriest newspaper doesn’t speak for China.” Foreign Policy, 2017, April 28. [URL].
Global Times. 2020, May 26. “Wuhan’s Huanan seafood market a victim of Covid-19: CDC director.” Global Times, 2020, May 26. [URL][URL].
Gutzmann, Daniel, and Erik Stei. 2011. “How quotation marks what people do with words.” Journal of Pragmatics 43: 2650–2663. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hagen, Kurtis. 2018. “Conspiracy theories and the paranoid style: Do conspiracy theories posit implausibly vast and evil conspiracies?” Social Epistemology 32 (1): 24–40. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamilton, Clive, and Mareike Ohlberg. 2020. Hidden Hand: Exposing How the Chinese Communist Party is Reshaping the World: Hardie Grant Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hofstadter, Richard. 1964. “The paranoid style in American politics.” Harper’s Magazine: 77–86.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra, ed. 2009. Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Joint WHO-China Study. 2021. WHO-convened Global Study of Origins of SARS-CoV-2: China Part. World Health Organization. [URL].
Jones, Jean G., and Herbert W. Simons. 2017. Persuasion in Society. 3rd edition ed. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jongepier, Fleur, and Michael Klenk. 2022. “Online manipulation: Charting the field.” In The Philosophy of Online Manipulation, edited by Fleur Jongepier and Michael Klenk, 15–48. New York: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kampf, Herbert A. 1987. “The challenge of Marxist-Leninist propaganda.” Political Communication 4 (2): 103–122. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keeley, Brian L. 1999. “Of conspiracy theories.” The Journal of Philosophy 96 (3): 109–126. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lucy, John A. 1993. “Reflexive language and the human disciplines.” In Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics, edited by John A. Lucy, 9–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Madisson, Mari-Liis, and Andreas Ventsel. 2022. “From strategic depiction of conspiracies to conspiracy theories: RT’s and Sputnik’s representations of coronavirus infodemic.” In Conspiracy Theory Discourses, edited by Massimiliano Demata, Virginia Zorzi and Angela Zottola, 443–464. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martin, Brian. 2020. “Dealing with conspiracy theory attributions.” Social Epistemology 34 (5): 409–422. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nettel, Ana Laura, and Georges Roque. 2012. “Persuasive argumentation versus manipulation.” Argumentation 26 (1): 55–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oliver, Eric J., and Thomas J. Wood. 2014. “Conspiracy theories and the paranoid style(s) of mass opinion.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (4): 952–966. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Parker, Martin. 2001. “Human science as conspiracy theory.” The Sociological Review 48, no. 2: 191–207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pelkmans, Mathijs, and Rhys Machold. 2011. “Conspiracy theories and their truth trajectories.” Focaal – Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology 59: 66–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perreault, Mildred F., and Gregory P. Perreault. 2021. “Journalists on Covid-19 journalism: Communication ecology of pandemic reporting.” American Behavioral Scientist 65 (7): 976–991. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pompeo, Joe. 2020, May 8. ““The discussion is basically over”: Why scientists believe the Wuhan-lab coronavirus origin theory is highly unlikely.” Vanity Fair, 2020, May 8. [URL].
Popper, Karl. 1963. Conjectures and Refutations. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shear, Michael D. 2020, Apr 7. “Trump attacks W.H.O. over criticisms of U.S. approach to coronavirus.” New York Times, 2020, Apr 7. [URL].
Silverstein, Michael. 1993. “Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function.” In Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics, edited by John A. Lucy, 33–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. “Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life.” Language & Communication 23: 193–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sunstein, Cass R., and Adrian Vermeule. 2008. “Conspiracy theories: Causes and cures.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (2): 202–227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thacker, Paul D. 2021. “The Covid-19 lab leak hypothesis: Did the media fall victim to a misinformation campaign?” bmj 374. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Unclassified Summary of Assessment on Covid-19 Origins. 2021, August 26. edited by Office of the Director of National Intelligence. [URL].
Verschueren, Jef. 1999. Understanding Pragmatics. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. “Notes on the role of metapragmatic awareness in language use.” Pragmatics 10 (4): 439–456.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wade, Nicholas. 2021, May 5. “The origin of COVID: Did people or nature open Pandora’s box at Wuhan?” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 2021, May 5. [URL].
White House. 2021, May 26. Statement by President Joe Biden on the Investigation into the Origins of Covid-19. White House. [URL].
Whitfield, Gregory. 2022. “On the concept of political manipulation.” European Journal of Political Theory 21 (4): 783–807. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yang, Yifan, and Xuechen Chen. 2021. “Globalism or nationalism? The paradox of Chinese official discourse in the context of the Covid-19 outbreak.” Journal of Chinese Political Science 26: 89–113. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zhao, Xiaoyu. 2021. “A discourse analysis of quotidian expressions of nationalism during the Covid-19 pandemic in Chinese cyberspace.” Journal of Chinese Political Science 26: 277–293. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Berrocal, Martina
2024. Maintaining political authority and credibility during the Covid-19 crisis. In Manufacturing Dissent [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 339], ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Demata, Massimiliano
2024. The legitimation of conspiracy theories through manipulation. In Manufacturing Dissent [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 339], ► pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Marinho, Cristina & Michael Billig
2024. How can governments be prevented from manipulating statistics about Covid-19?. In Manufacturing Dissent [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 339], ► pp. 186 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue