Cover not available

In:Manufacturing Dissent: Manipulation and counter-manipulation in times of crisis
Edited by Cornelia Ilie
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 339] 2024
► pp. 62–84

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 2
Manipulation in exceptional times

Exploiting overwhelming contextual parameters for manipulative purposes

 | University of Fribourg
 | University of Fribourg
Published online: 17 January 2024
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.339.02mai
Abstract
This chapter offers a cognitively-grounded account of manipulative strategies speakers may use to challenge and discredit scientific discourse in times of crisis, in which the perceived reliability of scientific communication is vulnerable. Specifically, we explore how such an overwhelming context is ideally suited for manipulative attempts to spread misinformation. We illustrate our account by analysing two strategies: one by which political authorities attempted to discredit scientific expertise, and one by which minority experts tried to weaken mainstream scientific expertise. In so doing, we provide a principled account of the way manipulation targeting expert voices in public discourse can affect an audience’s epistemic vigilance mechanisms, while offering insights into the role overwhelming contexts can play in bringing about these manipulative effects.
Article outline
  • Introduction
  • Theoretical framework for manipulative discourse
  • Manipulation on the source of information and epistemic vigilance
  • Overwhelming contexts challenge the evaluation of source authority
  • When political authorities try to weaken scientific authorities
  • Weakening majority expertise and strengthening minority expertise
    • Weakening majority expertise: Didier Raoult’s ethotic strawmanning
    • Weakening majority expertise: The Stamina case
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
References (40)
References
Aikin, S., & Casey, J. 2011. Straw men, weak men, and hollow men. Argumentation, 25(1), 87–105. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016. Straw Men, Iron Men, and Argumentative Virtue. Topoi, 35, 431–440. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aikin, S. & Casey, J. 2022. Straw Man Arguments: A Study in Fallacy Theory. Bloomsbury Academic. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Berrocal, Martina. 2024. “Maintaining political authority and credibility during the Covid-19 crisis: The case of Czech government press conferences.” In Manufacturing Dissent: Manipulation and counter-manipulation in times of crisis, edited by Cornelia Ilie. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Byford, J. 2011. Conspiracy Theories. Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carston, R. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goertzel, T. 1994. Belief in conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 15, 731–742. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hansson S. 2015. Discursive strategies of blame avoidance in government: A framework for analysis. Discourse & Society 26(3):297–322. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hansson, S. 2018a. The discursive micro-politics of blame avoidance: unpacking the language of government blame games. Policy Sci, 51, 545–564. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2018b. Analysing opposition – government blame games: argument models and strategic maneuvering, Critical Discourse Studies, 15:3, 228–246. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herman, T. 2022. “Ethos and Pragmatics”. Languages 7(2), 139. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herman, Thierry, and Steve Oswald. 2022. ‘“You Want Me to Be Wrong”: Expert Ethos, (de-)Legitimation, and Ethotic Straw Men as Discursive Resources for Conspiracy Theories’. In Conspiracy Theory Discourses, edited by Massimiliano Demata, Virginia Zorzi, and Angela Zottola, 98:99–120. Amsterdam: Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hirst, W., & Phelps, E. A. 2016. Flashbulb Memories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(1), 36–41. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ilie, Cornelia. 2024. “Manipulating citizens’ beliefs and emotions: Consensus-seeking and dissensus-generating tactics in times of crisis.” In Manufacturing Dissent: Manipulation and counter-manipulation in times of crisis, edited by Cornelia Ilie. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Inhofe, J. M. 2012. The greatest hoax: How the global warming conspiracy threatens your future (First edition). WND Books.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kjeldsen, Jens E., Ragnhild Mølster, and Øyvind Ihlen. 2022. ‘Expert Uncertainty: Arguments Bolstering the Ethos of Expertise in Situations of Uncertainty’. In The Pandemic of Argumentation, edited by Steve Oswald, Marcin Lewiński, Sara Greco, and Serena Villata, 43:85–103. Argumentation Library. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lavazza, A. and M. Farina 2020, The Role of Experts in the Covid-19 Pandemic and the Limits of Their Epistemic Authority in Democracy. Frontiers: Public Health 8:356.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lewiński, M. 2022. Challenging Authority with Argumentation: The Pragmatics of Arguments from and to Authority. Languages 7(3), 207. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Macagno, F. & Walton, D. 2017. Interpreting Straw Man Argumentation: The Pragmatics of Quotation and Reporting. Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maillat, D. & Oswald, S. 2009. Defining manipulative discourse: the pragmatics of cognitive illusions. International Review of Pragmatics 1(2): 348–370. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. Constraining context: a pragmatic account of cognitive manipulation. In Hart, C. (ed.). Critical discourse studies in context and cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 65–80. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Maillat, D. 2013. Constraining Context Selection: On the Pragmatic Inevitability of Manipulation. Journal of Pragmatics, special issue, Maillat, D. & Oswald, S. (eds) Biases and constraints in communication: argumentation, persuasion and manipulation. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Marinho, Cristina & Bililig, Michael. 2024. “How can governments be prevented from manipulating statistics about Covid-19? An example from UK politics”. In Manufacturing Dissent: Manipulation and counter-manipulation in times of crisis, edited by Cornelia Ilie. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mazzarella, D. 2013. ‘Optimal relevance’ as a pragmatic criterion: the role of epistemic vigilance. UCLWPL, 20–45.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. 2011, 2011/04//. Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(02), 57–74. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2017. The enigma of reason. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oswald, S. 2010. Pragmatics of Uncooperative and Manipulative Communication [Université de Neuchâtel]. ms. [URL]
Oswald, S., Lewiński, M., Greco, S., & Villata, S. 2022. The Pandemic of Argumentation. Cham: Springer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Padilla Cruz, M. 2012. Epistemic vigilance, cautious optimism and sophisticated understanding. Research in Language, 10(4), 365–386. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Science Task Force 2020. “Role of Face masks as part of non-pharmaceutical interventions against coronavirus disease.” Accessed 20 June 2023. [URL]
Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G., & Wilson, D. 2010). Epistemic Vigilance. Mind & Language, 25 (4), 359–393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. 1995. Relevance: Communication & Cognition (second ed.). Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stanley, J. 2015. How propaganda works. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stopfner, Maria. 2024. Spanish Influenza 1918/19: A diachronic and cross-cultural perspective on blame and blame-avoidance in media and politics in times of crisis”. In Manufacturing Dissent: Manipulation and counter-manipulation in times of crisis, edited by Cornelia Ilie. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Talisse, R., & Aikin, S. 2006. Two Forms of the Straw Man. Argumentation, 20(3), 345–352. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wagner-Egger, P., & Bangerter, A. 2008. La vérité est ailleurs: Corrélats de l’adhésion aux théories du complot. Revue internationale de psychologie sociale, 20(4), 31–61.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. 2002. Truthfulness and Relevance. Mind, 111 (443), 583–632. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2012. Meaning and relevance. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zagarella, R. M., & Annoni, M. 2019. A rhetorical perspective on conspiracies: The Stamina case. Journal of Argumentation in Context, 8(2), 262–283. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Berrocal, Martina
2024. Maintaining political authority and credibility during the Covid-19 crisis. In Manufacturing Dissent [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 339], ► pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Ilie, Cornelia
2024. Crisis manipulation. In Manufacturing Dissent [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 339], ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Ilie, Cornelia
2024. Manipulating citizens’ beliefs and emotions. In Manufacturing Dissent [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 339], ► pp. 85 ff. DOI logo
Marinho, Cristina & Michael Billig
2024. How can governments be prevented from manipulating statistics about Covid-19?. In Manufacturing Dissent [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 339], ► pp. 186 ff. DOI logo
Stopfner, Maria
2024. Spanish influenza 1918/19. In Manufacturing Dissent [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 339], ► pp. 26 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue