In:A Pragmatic Agenda for Healthcare: Fostering inclusion and active participation through shared understanding
Edited by Sarah Bigi and Maria Grazia Rossi
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 338] 2023
► pp. 252–262
Chapter 10Establishing common ground to achieve therapeutic goals
Published online: 17 November 2023
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.338.10all
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.338.10all
Abstract
Healthcare professionals can normally assume that their patients are rational people and approach verbal interaction with the patient as they would with any fellow human being. Common ground is context shared between S (speaker, writer, signer) and H (audience) where S utters U (utterance), evoking context C1 (the ‘world and time spoken of’) so as to bring about in C3 (the ‘situation of interpretation’ from H’s point of view) H’s understanding U in terms of the relevant beliefs that S holds or purports to hold uttering U, i.e. speaking of C1 in C2 (the ‘world and time spoken in’ or situation of utterance from S’s point of view).
Article outline
- 1.The significance of common ground
- 2.Common ground and its near synonyms
- 3.Defining common ground
- 4.The interdependence of common ground and context
- 5.Conclusion
Notes References
References (26)
Allan, Keith. 1986/2014. Linguistic Meaning. 2 vols. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Reprint edn, Beijing: World Publishing Corporation, 1991. Reissued in one volume as Routledge Library Editions: Linguistics Volume 8, 2014.).
. 2013. “What is Common Ground?” In Perspectives on Linguistic Pragmatics, edited by Alessandro Capone, Franco Lo Piparo, and Marco Carapezza, 285–310. Cham: Springer.
. 2023. “The Interdependence of Common Ground and Context.” In Common Ground in First Language and Intercultural Interaction, edited by Istvan Kecskes, 7–24. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Colston, Herbert L. 2008. “A New Look at Common Ground: Memory, Egocentrism, and Joint Meaning.” In Intention, Common Ground and the Egocentric Speaker-Hearer, edited by Istvan Kecskes, and Jacob L. Mey, 151–87. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Enfield, Nicholas J. 2008. “Common Ground as a Resource for Social Affiliation.” In Intention, Common Ground and the Egocentric Speaker-Hearer, edited by Istvan Kecskes and Jacob L. Mey, 223–254. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Grice, H. Paul. 1981. “Presupposition and Conversational Implicature.” In Radical Pragmatics, edited by Peter Cole, 183–198. New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in H. Paul Grice (1989) Studies in the Way of Words, 269–282. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
. 1989. “Indicative Conditionals.” In Studies in the Way of Words, 58–85. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Holtgraves, Thomas M. 2002. Language as Social Action: Social Psychology and Language Use. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kecskes, Istvan, and Fenghui Zhang. 2009. “Activating, Seeking, and Creating Common Ground: a Socio-cognitive Approach.” Pragmatics and Cognition 17 (2): 331–355.
Lee, Benny P. H. 2001. “Mutual Knowledge, Background Knowledge and Shared Beliefs: Their Roles in Establishing Common Ground.” Journal of Pragmatics 33 (1): 21–44.
Prince, Ellen. 1981. “Toward a Taxonomy of Given-new Information.” In Radical Pragmatics, edited by Peter Cole, 223–256. New York: Academic Press.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Li, Chengtuan, Jing Han & Zhiwei Zhao
2025. Establishing emergent common ground. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
