Cover not available

In:Risk Discourse and Responsibility
Edited by Annelie Ädel and Jan-Ola Östman
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 336] 2023
► pp. 2–37

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 1
From risk and responsibility to risk discourse

ORCiD logo with link | Dalarna University, Sweden
ORCiD logo with link | University of Helsinki, Finland
ORCiD logo with link | Stockholm University, Sweden
Published online: 24 July 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.336.01ade
Abstract
Risk communication is widely researched in the social sciences, but in linguistics the study of how risk is communicated has not yet formed a coherent field of its own. In this chapter, we approach risk from a discourse perspective, aiming to promote the establishment of risk discourse as a field of study with its own characteristics. We approach the question “What is “risk”?” through a discourse-linguistic analysis that crucially involves the concept of responsibility. We show that there is a body of previous research in linguistics that has dealt with some aspect of risk, but typically without foregrounding risk or using risk as an analytical tool. We show how this state of affairs also applies to responsibility. We argue that an understanding of discourse about risk and risk scenarios needs to be informed by an understanding of the concept of responsibility. The theoretical point of this chapter is therefore to conceive of and establish this type of responsibility-embedded Risk Discourse. Throughout the chapter, we discuss ways in which risk and responsibility can serve as analytical tools in risk discourse studies. This is illustrated by reference not only to previous research, but also to the chapters included in the current volume.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Defining ‘risk’ and ‘responsibility’
    • 2.1What is ‘risk’?
    • 2.2What is ‘responsibility’?
    • 2.3Linking risk and responsibility
  • 3.What the study of risk as discourse entails
  • 4.Previous work on risk from the perspective of three definitional scopes
    • 4.1Narrow scope: Risk as characterizing a discourse type
    • 4.2Broad scope: Risk as topic
    • 4.3Extended scope: Discourse-framing something as risk
  • 5.On responsibility
  • 6.A matrix for risk discourse
  • 7.Risk and responsibility in the volume chapters
  • 8.Concluding words and implications
  • Notes
  • References
References (76)
References
Abell, Jackie & Elizabeth H. Stokoe. 1999. ““I Take Full Responsibility, I Take Some Responsibility, I’ll Take Half of it But No More Than That”: Princess Diana and the Negotiation of Blame in the “Panorama” Interview.” Discourse Studies 1(3). 297–319. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ädel, Annelie. 2010. “How to Use Corpus Linguistics in the Study of Political Discourse.” In Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, ed. by M. McCarthy, and A. O’Keeffe, 591–604. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ädel, Annelie, and Jan-Ola Östman. 2023. “You may feel a few butterflies in your stomach the first time walking out on a frozen lake: Balancing between Positive and Negative Risk in Adventure Tourism Discourse from ‘Arctic Lapland’.” Presentation at IPrA’s 18th International Pragmatics Conference, Brussels, Belgium.
Ädel, Annelie, Catharina Nyström Höög, and Jan-Ola Östman. 2022. “Risks and Responsibilities in the Workplace: Employees Discussing Evacuation Situations.” Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice 16 (3) [2019]: 265–288. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Adelswärd, Viveka, and Lisbeth Sacks. 1998. “Risk Discourse: Recontextualization of Numerical Values in Clinical Practice.” Text 18 (2): 191–210.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Andrén, Mats, Johan M. Sanne, and Per Linell. 2010. ”Striking the Balance between Formality and Informality in Safety-Critical Communication: Train Traffic Control Calls.” Journal of Pragmatics 42: 220–241. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Archer, Wendy & Ruth Parry. 2019. “Blame attributions and mitigated confessions: The discursive construction of guilty admissions in celebrity TV confessionals.” Discourse and Communication 13(5): 591–611. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Atkinson, Paul. 1999. “Medical discourse, evidentiality and the construction of professional responsibility.” In Talk, Work and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings, ed. by Srikant Sarangi and Celia Roberts (eds), 75–108. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bamberg, Michael. 1997. “Positioning between Structure and Performance.” Journal of Narrative and Life History 7 (1–4): 335–342. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bamberg, Michael, and Alexandra Georgakopoulou. 2008. “Small Stories as a New Perspective in Narrative and Identity Analysis.” Text & Talk 28: 377–396. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bieswanger, Markus. 2016. “Aviation English: Two Distinct Specialised Registers?” In Variational Text Linguistics: Revisiting Register in English, ed. by Christina Sanchez-Stockhammer, and Christoph Schubert, 67–85. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bocanegra-Valle, Ana. 2011. “The Language of Seafaring: Standardized Conventions and Discursive Features in Speech Communications.” European Journal of English Studies 11 (1): 35–53.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Boholm, Max. 2018. “Risk Association: Towards a Linguistically Informed Framework for Analysing Risk in Discourse.” Journal of Risk Research 21 (4): 480–501. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bulcaen, Chris. 2016. “Reflexivity in the Institution, and how It Entangles with Research.” In Discourse and Responsibility in Professional Settings, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman, and Anna Solin, 141–159. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Candlin, Christopher N., Jonathan Crichton, and Arthur S. Firkins. 2016. “Crucial Sites and Research Orientations: Exploring the Communication of Risk.” In Communicating Risk, ed. by Jonathan Crichton, Christopher N. Candlin, and Arthur S. Firkins, 1–16. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cap, Piotr. 2017. The Language of Fear: Communicating Threat in Public Discourse. London & New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021. The Discourse of Conflict and Crisis: Poland’s Political Rhetoric in the European Perspective. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crichton, Jonathan, Christopher N. Candlin, and Arthur S. Firkins (eds). 2016. Communicating Risk. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Danesi, Marcel. 2022. Warning Signs: The Semiotics of Danger. London: Bloomsbury. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dietrich, Rainer (ed). 2003. Communication in High Risk Environments. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Shoshana. 2017. “‘Mum, the pot broke’: Taking responsibility (or not) in language.” Discourse & Society 28(4): 374–391. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
DuBay, William H. 2004. The Principles of Readability. Costa Mesa, CA: Impact information.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dudo, A., D.-H. Choi, and D. A. Scheufele. 2011. “Food Nanotechnology in the News. Coverage Patterns and Thematic Emphases during the Last Decade.” Appetite 56: 78–89. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dunmire, Patricia. 2005. “Preempting the Future: Rhetoric and Ideology of the Future in Political Discourse.” Discourse & Society 16: 481–513. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ekwall, Per Erik, Catharina Nyström Höög, and Annelie Ädel. 2021. “Towards a Unified Affordance Approach: Searching for Congruent Meaning Making in COVID-19 Warning Designs.” Social Semiotics. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita. 2016. “Political Interviews and Responsibility: A Case Study of its Interactional Organization.” In Discourse and Responsibility in Professional Settings, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman, and Anna Solin, 163–196. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., and B. T. S. Atkins. 1992. “Towards a Frame-Based Lexicon: The Semantics of RISK and Its Neighbors.” In Frames, Fields and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantics and Lexical Organization, ed. by A. Lehrer, and E. Kittay, 75–102. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Firkins, Arthur S., and Christopher N. Candlin. 2016. “Projecting a Definition of Risk Situation: Travel Advice and the Prudential Traveller.” In Communicating Risk, ed. by Jonathan Crichton, Christopher N. Candlin, and Arthur S. Firkins, 323–339. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Firkins, Arthur, and Christopher N. Candlin. 2006. “Framing the Child at Risk.” Health, Risk & Society 8 (3): 273–291. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fløttum, Kjersti, and Trine Dahl. 2014. “IPCC Communicative Practices: A Linguistic Comparison of the Summary for Policymakers 2007 and 2013.” LSP Journal 5 (2): 66–83.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forceville, Charles, and Jens E. Kjeldsen. 2018. “The Affordances and Constraints of Situation and Genre: Visual and Multimodal Rhetoric in Unusual Traffic Signs.” International Review of Pragmatics 10 (2): 158–178. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fuoli, Matteo. 2012. “Assessing social responsibility: A quantitative analysis of Appraisal in BP’s and IKEA’s social reports.” Discourse & Communication 6(1): 55–81. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Garcia, Angela Cora. 2016. “Air Traffic Communications in Routine and Emergency Contexts: A Case Study of Flight 1549 ‘Miracle on the Hudson’.” Journal of Pragmatics 106: 57–71. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1999. “Risk and Responsibility.” The Modern Law Review 62 (1): 1–10. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gorter, Durk. 2014. “Linguistic Landscape Studies.” In Handbook of Pragmatics 18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graber, D. 1981. “Political Discourse.” In Handbook of Political Communication, ed. by D. Nimmo, and K. Sanders, 195–224. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grundmann, Reiner, and Ramesh Krishnamurthy. 2010. “The Discourse of Climate Change: A Corpus-Based Approach.” CADAAD 4 (2): 125–146.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hamilton, Craig, Svenja Adolphs, and Brigitte Nerlich. 2007. “The Meanings of ‘risk’: A View from Corpus Linguistics.” Discourse & Society 18 (2): 163–181. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hansson, Sven Ove. 2018. “Risk.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2018 Edition), ed. by Edward N. Zalta. [URL]
Harmon, Michael M. 1995. Responsibility as Paradox. A Critique of Rational Discourse on Government. London: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haugh, Michael. 2012. “Epilogue: The First-Second Order Distinction in Face and Politeness Research.” Journal of Politeness Research 8 (1): 111–134. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jaworska, Sylvia, and Nanda, Anupam. 2018. Doing Well by Talking Good? A Topic Modelling-Assisted Discourse Study of Corporate Social Responsibility. Applied Linguistics 39(3): 373–399. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
John, Peter, Benjamin Brooks, and Ulf Schriever. 2019. “Speech Acts in Professional Maritime Discourse: A Pragmatic Risk Analysis of Bridge Team Communication Directives and Commissives in Full-Mission Simulation.” Journal of Pragmatics 140: 12–21. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Johnson, Alison. 2008. “‘From where we’re sat…’: Negotiating narrative transformation through interaction in police interviews with suspects.” Text & Talk 28: 327–349. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jolanki, Outi. 2016. “Whose Business is It Anyway? Distributing Responsibilities between Family Members and Formal Carers.” In Discourse and Responsibility in Professional Settings, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman, and Anna Solin, 96–119. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jore, Sissel H. 2019. ”The Conceptual and Scientific Demarcation of Security in Contrast to Safety.” European Journal of Security Research 4: 157–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jore, Sissel H., and Ove Njå. 2010. “Risk of Terrorism: A Scientifically Valid Phenomenon or a Wild Guess? The Impact of Different Approaches to Risk Assessment.” CADAAD 2 (4): 197–216.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Juhila, Kirsi, Suvi Raitakari, and Christopher Hall (eds). 2017. Responsibilisation at the Margins of Welfare Services. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lakoff, Robin Tolmach. 2016. “Taking ‘Responsibility’: From Word to Discourse.” In Discourse and Responsibility in Professional Settings, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman, and Anna Solin, 19–36. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lindgren, Ida, Richard Hirsch, and Peter Berggren. 2007. “It Takes Three Points to Define a Common Ground: Breathing Apparatus Fire-fighters’ Communication during Rescue Operations.” Journal of Pragmatics 39: 1482–1502. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Anina Kinzel, and Matteo Di Cristofaro. 2019. “The Communicative Modus Operandi of Online Child Sexual Groomers: Recurring Patterns in Their Language Use.” Journal of Pragmatics 155: 15–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria, Luke Walker, and Anina Kinzel. 2017. “The Role of Discourse Analysis in Terrorism Studies.” In Terrorists’ Use of the Internet: Assessment and Response, ed. by Maura Conway, Lee Jarvis, Orla Lehane, Stuart Macdonald, and Lella Nouri, 158–169. The Hague: iOS Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matarese, Maureen T. 2016. “‘Getting Placed’ in Time: Responsibility Talk in Caseworker-Client Interaction.” In Discourse and Responsibility in Professional Settings, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman, and Anna Solin, 120–140. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Minnema, Gosse, Sara Gemelli, Chiara Zanchi, Viviana Patti, Tommaso Caselli & Malvina Nissim. 2021. “Frame Semantics for Social NLP in Italian: Analyzing responsibility framing in femicide news reports.” In Proceedings of the Eighth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics, ed. by Elisabetta Fersini, Marco Passarotti and Viviana Patti. CEUR Workshop Proceedings (CEUR-WS.org).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murray, Jeffrey W. 2000. “Bakhtinian Answerability and Levinasian Responsibility: Forging a Fuller Dialogical Communicative Ethics.” Southern Communication Journal 65 (2–3): 133–150. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nisbet, Matthew C. 2009. “Communicating Climate Change: Why Frames Matter for Public Engagement.” Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 51 (2): 12–23. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
OED: Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press.
Olofsson, Anna, and Jens O. Zinn (eds.). 2019. Researching Risk and Uncertainty, Critical Studies in Risk and Uncertainty. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Östman, Jan-Ola. Forthcoming. “Responsibility in Construction Discourse.” In Structures in Discourse: Interaction, Adaptability, and Pragmatic Functions, ed. by Martin Gill, Aino Malmivirta, and Brita Wårvik. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Östman, Jan-Ola, and Anna Solin (eds). 2016. Discourse and Responsibility in Professional Settings. Studies in Communication in Organisations and Professions 3. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Popper, Karl. 1945. The Open Society and Its Enemies, vol. 1 & 2. Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1987. “Toleration and Intellectual Responsibility.” In On Toleration, ed. by Susan Mendus, and David Edwards, 17–34. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant. 2016. “Owning Responsible Actions/Selves: Role-Relational Trajectories in Counselling for Childhood Genetic Testing.” In Discourse and Responsibility in Professional Settings, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman, and Anna Solin, 37–63. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant, and Christopher Candlin. 2003. “Categorization and Explanation of Risk: A Discourse Analytic Perspective.” Health, Risk and Society 5 (2): 115–124. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaw, Christopher, Iina Hellsten, and Brigitte Nerlich. 2016. “Framing Risk and Uncertainty in Social Science Articles on Climate Change, 1995–2012.” In Communicating Risk, ed. by Jonathan Crichton, Christopher N. Candlin, and Arthur S. Firkins, 208–228. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Solin, Anna. 2016. “Construing Professional Norms in Journalism: Responsibility and Risk Reporting.” In Discourse and Responsibility in Professional Settings, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman, and Anna Solin, 285–303. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Solin, Anna, and Jan-Ola Östman. 2016. “The Notion of Responsibility in Discourse Studies.” In Discourse and Responsibility in Professional Settings, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman, and Anna Solin, 1–18. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stenvall, Maija. 2016. “Responsibility and the Conventions of Attribution in News Agency Discourse.” In Discourse and Responsibility in Professional Settings, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman, and Anna Solin, 239–258. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tang, Chris, and Gabriella Rundblad. 2017. “When Safe Means ‘Dangerous’: A Corpus Investigation of Risk Communication in the Media.” Applied Linguistics 38 (5): 666–687. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thomassen, Gøril, Srikant Sarangi, and John-Arne Skolbekken. 2016. “Negotiating Parental/Familial Responsibility in Genetic Counselling.” In Discourse and Responsibility in Professional Settings, ed. by Jan-Ola Östman, and Anna Solin, 67–95. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Verschueren, Jef. 2012. Ideology in Language Use. Pragmatic Guidelines for Empirical Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
WHO – World Health Organization ([URL]
Zinn, Jens (ed). 2010. Risk as Discourse: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. SI of CADAAD (Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines) 4 (2).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zinn, Jens, and Anna Olofsson. 2019. “Introduction.” In Researching Risk and Uncertainty: Methodologies, Methods and Research Strategies, ed. by Jens Zinn, and Anna Olofsson, 1–28. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Ädel, Annelie & Jan-Ola Östman
2025. Positive and negative risk in adventure tourism discourse: adrenaline hunting in “arctic Lapland”. Text & Talk 45:6 ► pp. 725 ff. DOI logo
Östman, Jan-Ola
2025. Construction Discourse. In The Cambridge Handbook of Construction Grammar, ► pp. 519 ff. DOI logo
Östman, Jan-Ola & Helena Halmari
2025. Death-Row inmates’ last statements. In Identity Perspectives from Peripheries [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 352], ► pp. 218 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue