Cover not available

In:The Pragmatics of Humour in Interactive Contexts
Edited by Esther Linares Bernabéu
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 335] 2023
► pp. 200–216

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Co-constructing humour and gender identity in live stand-up comedy

 | Universitat de València – IULMA
Published online: 24 May 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.335.09ber
Abstract
This chapter explores the role of kairos in female stand-up comedy, looking specifically at the co-construction of humour between performer and audience. Stand-up performers adapt their routines depending on their audiences, trying to draw these into the performance through the use of kairos, understood as the opportune and unpredictable moments of persuasion in which comedians choose to respond to and interact with their audience with the aim of promoting a humorous effect (Greenbaum 1999; Medjesky 2017). In order to verify this claim, the present study is an analysis of the FEMMES-UP corpus (Linares Bernabéu, 2020), which comprises 15 humorous stand-up comedy performances by 15 female Spanish comedians. The corpus has been transcribed and segmented into 504 sequences, and we focus here on 113 of these, in all of which there is direct dialogue between the comedian and one or more members of the audience. The findings show that humour facilitates friendly interaction and helps comedians to negotiate their identity. In fact, the stand-ups in these data use kairos to adapt their speech in light of how audiences respond. Overall, the research reported here confirms that female stand-up comedy is a type of planned discourse, and that it is used by comedians as a cultural and social tool in terms of confrontation and resistance.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The genre of stand-up comedy and interactional humour
    • 2.1Stand-up comedy performances
    • 2.2Kairos in comedy
    • 2.3Interaction with the audience
  • 3.Methodology
  • 4.Analysis of interactional humour in the stand-up comedy act
    • 4.1Frequency of direct interactions with the audience
    • 4.2Qualitative analysis of interaction in stand-up comedy
      • 4.2.1Audience participation
      • 4.2.2Checking knowledge
      • 4.2.3Attracting attention
      • 4.2.4Interruptions from the audience
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
References (46)
References
Adetunji, Akin. 2013. The interactional context of humor in Nigerian stand-up comedy. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA), 23(1), 1–22.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore. 2002. Humor and irony in interaction: From mode adoption to failure of detection. Emerging communication, 3, 159–180.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. Humor and mirth: emotions, embodied cognition, and sustained humor. In Emotion in discourse (pp. 189–211). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bell, Allan, and Andi Gibson. 2011. Staging language: An introduction to the sociolinguistics of performance. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 15(5), 555–572. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bing, Janet, and Joanne Scheibman. 2014. Blended spaces as subversive feminist humour. In Gender and Humour: Interdisciplinary and International Perspectives, edited by Delia Chiaro and Raffaela Baccolini, 13–29, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Briz Gómez, Antonio and Grupo Val.Es.Co., (2002): Corpus de conversaciones coloquiales. Anejo de la revista Oralia. Madrid: Arco-LibrosGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. The borders of humorous intent–The case of TV comedies. Journal of Pragmatics, 95, 58–66. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brown Jr, James J. 2017. Louis C.K.’s “weird ethic”. Kairos and Rhetoric in the Network. In Standing Up, Speaking Out: Stand-up Comedy and the Rhetoric of Social Change, edited by Meier, Matthew. R., and Casey R. Schmitt, 245–254, New York: Routledge, Taylor and FrancisGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chovanec, Jan., and Tsakona, Villy. 2018. “Investigating the dynamics of humor: Towards a theory of interactional humor”. In The Dynamics of Interactional Humor. Creating and negotiating humor in everyday encounters, edited by Jan Chovanec and Villy Tsakona, 1–26, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Coates, Jennifer. 2007. Talk in a play frame: More on laughter and intimacy. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(1), 29–42. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dore, Margherita. 2018. Laughing at you or laughing with you? In The Dynamics of Interactional Humor: Creating and negotiating humor in everyday encounters, edited by Tsakona, Villy, and Jan Chovanec, 105–126, Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dynel, Marta. 2018. Taking cognisance of cognitive linguistic research on humour. Review of Cognitive Linguistics. Published under the auspices of the Spanish Cognitive Linguistics Association, 16(1), 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Turner, Mark. 2013. Polysemy and conceptual blending. In Trends in linguistics studies and monographs, edited by Patrizia Noel Aziz Hanna, 79–94, Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gelang, Marie. 2013. Kairos, the Rhythm of Timing. In Off Beat (pp. 89–101). Brill Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fons, Kako. 2017. La creación del material de la comedia. In Micro abierto. Textos sobre stand-up comedy, edited by Alés, Dani; Navarro Romero, Rosa María, 179–186, Madrid: Servicio de publicaciones de la Universidad Autónoma de MadridGoogle Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1979. Footing. Semiotica, 25(1–2), 1–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenbaum, Andrea. 1999. Stand-up comedy as rhetorical argument: An investigation of comic culture. Humor 12(1). 33–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Greenbaum, Angela. 1999. Stand-up comedy as rhetorical argument: An investigation of comic culture. Humour-International Journal of Humour Research, 12(1), 33–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer. 1995. Gender and humour: Beyond a joke. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. The pragmatics of humor support. Humor – International Journal of Humor Research, 14 (1): 55–82, Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Karachaliou, Rania, and Archakis, Argis. 2015. Identity construction patterns via swearing:: Evidence from Greek teenage storytelling. Pragmatics and Society, 6(3),421–443. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kramer, Elise. 2011. The playful is political: The metapragmatics of internet rape-joke arguments. Language in Society, 40(2), 137–168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linares Bernabéu, Esther. 2020. La construcción discursiva de la identidad de género femenina en el monólogo humorístico subversivo (Doctoral dissertation, Universitat d’Alacant-Universidad de Alicante).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2021a. El monólogo humorístico subversivo en español: Pragmática, humor verbal y construcción discursiva del género. Madrid: Iberoamericana Vervuert. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Linares Bernabéu, Esther. 2021b. Cognitive strategies and figurative language in subversive stand-up comedy: the case of trumping. Studies in Psychology (Special Issue), 1–34.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lockyer, Sharon., and Pickering, Michael. 2005. Introduction: The ethics and aesthetics of humour and comedy. In Beyond a Joke, edited by Sharon Lockyer, and Michael Pickering, 1–24, London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Martínez-Alés García, Daniel. 2016. El monólogo cómico español como género autoficcional: apuntes para una poética. Tesis doctoral inédita leída en la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras, Departamento de Lingüística, Lenguas Modernas, Lógica y Filosofía de la Ciencia, Teoría de la Literatura y Literatura Comparada.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Medjesky, Christopher. A. 2017. How can rape be funny? Comic persona, Irony and the Limits of rape jokes. In Standing Up, Speaking Out: Stand-up Comedy and the Rhetoric of Social Change, edited by Matthew R. Meier, and Casey R. Schmitt, 227–244, New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meier, Matthew R., and Casey R. Schmitt, eds. 2017. Standing Up, Speaking Out: Stand-up Comedy and the Rhetoric of Social Change. Routledge, Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mock, Roberta. 2012. Stand-up comedy and the legacy of the mature vagina. Women and Performance: a journal of feminist theory, 22(1), 9–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rao, Sameer. 2011. “Joke’s on you!” Stand-up comedy performance and the management of hecklers. Senior thesis, Department of Sociology, Haverford College.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rodríguez Santos, José María (2019). El posicionamiento del “ethos” como estrategia retórica en la comedia de “stand-up” de Valladolid. Signa: Revista de la Asociación Española de Semiótica, (28), 1295–1327. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz Gurillo, Leonor. (2012). La lingüística del humor en español. Madrid: Arco-Libros.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ruiz Gurillo, Leonor. 2013. El monólogo humourístico como tipo de discurso. El dinamismo de los rasgos primarios. Cuadernos Aispi, (2), 195–218.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2019). Humor de género del texto a la identidad en español. Editorial Iberoamericana Vervuert. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rutter, Jason. 1997. Stand-up as interaction: Performance and audience in comedy venues (Doctoral dissertation, University of Salford).Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. (2001). Rhetoric in stand-up comedy: Exploring performer-audience interaction. Stylistyka, 10, 307–325.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsakona, Villy. 2017. Genres of humor. The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humour. New York: Routledge, pp. 489–503. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scarpetta, Fabiola, and Anna Spagnolli (2009) The interactional context of humor in stand-up comedy. Research on Language and Social Interaction 42.3: 210-230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schnurr, Stephanie., and Chan, Angela. (2011). Exploring another side of co-leadership: Negotiating professional identities through face-work in disagreements. Language in Society, 40(2), 187–209. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwarz, Jeannine. 2009. Linguistic aspects of verbal humor in stand-up comedy. Thesis dissertation.[URL]
Val.Es.Co. 2014. Las unidades del discurso oral. La propuesta Val.Es.Co. de segmentación de la conversación (coloquial). Estudios de Lingüística del Español, 35, 13–73.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Yus, Francisco. 2016. Humour and Relevance (Vol. 4). John Benjamins Publishing company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zillmann, Dolf, and Joanne R. Cantor. 1996. A disposition theory of humor and mirth. In Humor and laughter: Theory, research and applications, edited by Antoni J. Chapman, and Hugh C. Foot, 93–115, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Filani, Ibukun
2025. The comedian’s identity, audience’s perspective(s) and problematic jokes. Pragmatics & Cognition 32:1 ► pp. 69 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue