Cover not available

In:The Pragmatics of Humour in Interactive Contexts
Edited by Esther Linares Bernabéu
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 335] 2023
► pp. 65–86

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

From mode adoption to saluting a dead kitten

Reactions to a humorous tweet by Ricky Gervais

 | University School for Advanced Studies IUSS – Pavia
 | Texas A&M University-Commerce
Published online: 24 May 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.335.03bis
Abstract
There has been some research in what can be broadly described as humor performance in the reactions to humorous turns (be they punch lines or jab lines). Two areas that have received particular attention are (1) the reactions to irony, which have been shown to range from mode adoption (i.e., when the respondent adopts the ironical mode and responds with irony to the irony) to treating the irony as a “literal” statement and reacting to it ignoring its ironical intention; and (2) failed humor, in which the range of reactions is much broader, from laughter to open expression of displeasure.
Much less has been written on reactions in online discourse and this case study of one humorous tweet by comedian Ricky Gervais, mocking the Academy Award ceremony (the Oscars), will be examined to examine the differences between a corpus of 200+ tweets as responses to Gervais’ original tweet, and proviso studies. We will also consider how much the exchange can be quantified as to its viral nature.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Methodology
    • 2.1Description of Ricky Gervais’ tweet
    • 2.2Data collection and corpus creation section
    • 2.3Replies categorization
    • 2.4Corpus creation
    • 2.5Data analysis
  • 3.Results
    • 3.1Corpus analysis and classification of tweets
    • 3.2Analysis of individual tweets
      • 3.2.1GTVH analysis of a plaudit
      • 3.2.2A case of seemingly failed intention recognition
      • 3.2.3The case of “aware” mode adoption
  • 4.Discussion
  • 5.Limitations of the study
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • Reference list
References (54)
Reference list
Aguert, Marc, Virginie Laval, Nadia Gauducheau, Hassan Atifi, and Michel Marcoccia. 2016. “Producing irony in adolescence: A comparison between face-to-face and computer-mediated communication.” Psychology of Language and Communication 20 (3): 199–218. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Alba-Juez, Laura, and Salvatore Attardo. 2014. “The evaluative palette of verbal irony.” In Evaluation in context, ed. by Geoff Thompson, and Laura Alba-Juez, 93–116. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore. 2000a. “Irony as relevant inappropriateness”. Journal of Pragmatics 32 (6): 793–826. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000b. “Irony markers and functions: Towards a goal-oriented theory of irony and its processing”. Rask 12: 3–20.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. “Humor and irony in interaction: From mode adoption to failure detection”. In Say not to say: New perspectives on miscommunication, ed. by Luigi Anolli, Rita Ciceri, and Giuseppe Riva, 159–179. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2020. “Memes, memeiosis, and memetic drift: Cheryl’s Chichier She Shed.” Media Linguistics 7 (2): 146–168. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore, and Anthony D. Mitzel. 2020. “Death of the Cool: Memeiosis, Virality, Dankness, and the Lifecycle of Memes.” Paper presented at the10th Humor Research Conference. Commerce, TX.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Attardo, Salvatore, and Victor Raskin. 1991. “Script theory revis(it)ed: Joke similarity and joke representation model.” Humor: International Journal of Humor Research 4 (3–4): 293–347. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bambini, Valentina, Luca Bischetti, Chiara G. Bonomi, Giorgio Arcara, Serena Lecce, and Mauro Ceroni. 2020. “Beyond the motor account of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Verbal humour and its relationship with the cognitive and pragmatic profile.” International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 55: 751–764. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Best, Paul, Roger Manktelow, and Brian Taylor. 2014. “Online communication, social media and adolescent wellbeing: A systematic narrative review.” Children and Youth Services Review 41: 27–36. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bischetti, Luca, Paolo Canal, and Valentina Bambini. 2021. “Funny but aversive: A large-scale survey of the emotional response to Covid-19 humor in the Italian population during the lockdown.” Lingua 249: 102963. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bischetti, Luca, Irene Ceccato, Serena Lecce, Elena Cavallini, and Valentina Bambini. 2019. “Pragmatics and theory of mind in older adults’ humor comprehension.” Current Psychology. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brasset, James. 2009. “British irony, global justice: a pragmatic reading of Chris Brown, Banksy and Ricky Gervais.” Review of International Studies 35 (1): 219–245. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bryant, Gregory A. 2011. “Verbal irony in the wild.” Pragmatics and Cognition 19 (2): 291–309. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burgers, Christian, and Margot van Mulken. 2017. “Humor markers.” In The Routledge handbook of language and humor, ed. by Salvatore Attardo, 385–399. New York, NY; London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Canal, Paolo, Luca Bischetti, Simona Di Paola, Chiara Bertini, Irene Ricci, and Valentina Bambini. 2019. “‘Honey, shall I change the baby?–Well done, choose another one’: ERP and time-frequency correlates of humor processing.” Brain and Cognition 132: 41–55. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, Emily, and Tom Jackman. 2021, November 22. “Florida man photographed with Pelosi’s lectern on Jan. 6 pleads guilty.” The Washington Post. [URL]
Deliens, Gaétane, Fanny Papastamou, Nicolas Ruytenbeek, Philippine Geelhand, and Mikhail Kissine. 2018. “Selective Pragmatic Impairment in Autism Spectrum Disorder: Indirect Requests Versus Irony.” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 48: 2938–2952. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Delignette-Mulle, Marie L., and Christophe Dutang. 2015. “fitdistrplus: An R Package for Fitting Distributions.” Journal of Statistical Software 64 (4): 1–34. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Eisterhold, Jodi, Salvatore Attardo, and Diana Boxer. 2006. “Reactions to irony in discourse: evidence for the least disruption principle.” Journal of Pragmatics, 38 (8): 1239–1256. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Farías, Delia I. H., Viviana Patti, and Paolo Rosso. 2016. “Irony detection in twitter: The role of affective content.” ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT) 16 (3): 1–24. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fetzer, Anita, Elda Weizman, and Lawrence N. Berlin (eds). 2015. The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and Functions of Follow-ups. Amsterdam; Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fleiss, Joseph L., Bruce Levin, and Myunghee C. Paik. 2013. Statistical methods for rates and proportions – 3rd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gal, Noam (2019). “Ironic humor on social media as participatory boundary work.” New Media and Society 21 (3): 729–749. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gamer, Matthias, Jim Lemon, Ian Fellows, and Puspendra Singh. 2019. “irr: Various Coefficients of Interrater Reliability and Agreement.” R package.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbs, Raymond W. 2000. “Irony in talk among friends.” Metaphor and Symbol 15 (1–2): 5–27. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giora, Rachel, and Inbal Gur. 2003. “Irony in conversation: salience, role, and context effects.” In Polysemy: Flexible patterns of meaning in mind and language, ed. by Brigitte Nerlich, Zazie Todd, Vimala Herman, and David D. Clarke, 297–316. Berlin; New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, Paul. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA; London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hacker, Jacob S., and Paul Pierson. 2020. Let them eat tweets: How the right rules in an age of extreme inequality. New York, NY: Liveright Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hancock, Jeffrey T. 2004a. “LOL: humor online.” Interactions 11 (5): 57–58. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2004b. “Verbal irony use in face-to-face and computer-mediated conversations.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology 23 (4): 447–463. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Herring, Susan C. 1999. “Interactional coherence in CMC”. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers: 13. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2010. “Computer-mediated conversation Part I: Introduction and overview.” Language@Internet 7: 2.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hinton, Andrew. 2014. Understanding context: Environment, language, and information architecture. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kotthoff, Helga (2003). “Responding to irony in different contexts: On cognition in conversation.” Journal of Pragmatics 35 (9): 1387–1411. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kreuz, Roger J., and Sam Glucksberg. 1989. “How to be sarcastic: The echoic reminder theory of verbal irony.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 118 (4): 374–386. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Landis, J. Richard, and Gary G. Koch. 1977. “The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.” Biometrics 33 (1): 159–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, Diane, and Lynne Cameron. 2008. “Research methodology on language development from a complex systems perspective.” The Modern Language Journal 92 (2): 200–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Livnat, Zohar, and Gonen Dori-Hacohen. 2018. “Indexing membership via responses to irony: Communication competence in Israeli radio call-in shows.” Language and Communication 58: 62–79. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McKenna, Tony. 2015. “From Tragedy to Farce: The Comedy of Ricky Gervais as Capitalist Critique”. In Art, Literature and Culture from a Marxist Perspective, ed. by Tony McKenna, 197–209. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Milner, Ryan M. 2013. “FCJ-156 Hacking the Social: Internet Memes, Identity Antagonism, and the Logic of Lulz.” The Fibreculture Journal 22: 62–92.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nuolijärvi, Pirkko, and Liisa Tiittula. 2011. “Irony in political television debates.” Journal of Pragmatics 43 (2): 572–587. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Olkoniemi, Henri, Viivi Strömberg, and Johanna K. Kaakinen. 2019. “The ability to recognise emotions predicts the time-course of sarcasm processing: Evidence from eye movements.” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (5): 1212–1223. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2021. “R: A language and environment for statistical computing.” R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rahtu, Toini. 2011. “Irony and (in) coherence: Interpreting irony using reader responses to texts.” Text and Talk 31 (3): 335–354. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reyes, Antonio, Paolo Rosso, and Davide Buscaldi. 2012. “From humor recognition to irony detection: The figurative language of social media.” Data and Knowledge Engineering 74: 1–12. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reyes, Antonio, Paolo Rosso, and Tony Veale. 2013. “A multidimensional approach for detecting irony in Twitter.” Language Resources and Evaluation 47: 239–268. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Teixeira, Carlos R. G., Gabriela Kurtz, Lorenzo P. Leuck, Roberto Tietzmann, Daniele R. de Souza, João M. F. Lerina, Isabel H. Manssour, and Milene S. Silveira. 2018. “Humor, support and criticism: a taxonomy for discourse analysis about political crisis on Twitter.” In Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age (dg.o '18), Article 68, 1–6. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, Dominic, and Ruth Filik. 2016. “Sarcasm in written communication: Emoticons are efficient markers of intention.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 21 (2): 105–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tsakona, Villy. 2020. Recontextualizing humor. Rethinking the analysis and teaching of humor. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weissman, Benjamin, and Darren Tanner. 2018. “A strong wink between verbal and emoji-based irony: How the brain processes ironic emojis during language comprehension.” PLoS ONE 13 (8): e0201727. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weizman, Elda. 2015. Irony in and through follow-ups. In The Dynamics of Political Discourse: Forms and Functions of Follow-Ups, ed. by Anita Fetzer, Elda Weizman, and Lawrence N. Berlin, 173–194. Amsterdam; Philadephia, PA: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Weller, Katrin, Axel Bruns, Jean Burgess, Merja Mahrt, and Cornelius Puschmann (eds). 2013. Twitter and Society. New York, NY; Bern; Berlin; Bruxelles; Frankfurt am Main; Oxford; Wien: Peter Lang Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whalen, Juanita M., and Penny M. Pexman. 2017. “Humor support and mode adoption”. The Routledge Handbook of Language and Humor, ed. by Salvatore Attardo, 371–384. New York, NY; London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue