Cover not available

In:Revisiting Sentence Adverbials and Relevance
Irina T. Pandarova
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 334] 2023
► pp. 233–248

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
authorization required

Bibliography

Published online: 27 June 2023
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.334.refs
Ahern, Aoife K., and Manuel Leonetti. 2004. “The Spanish Subjunctive: Procedural Semantics and Pragmatic Inference.” In Current Trends in the Pragmatics of Spanish, ed. by Rosina Márquez Reiter, and María E. Placencia, 35–57. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aijmer, Karin. 2009. “The Pragmatics of Adverbs.” In One Language, Two Grammars? Differences between British and American English, ed. by Günter Rohdenburg, and Julia Schlüter, 324–340. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2018. “Evidentiality: The Framework.” In The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality, ed. by Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, 1–43. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allerton, D. J., and Alan Cruttenden. 1974. “English Sentence Adverbials: Their Syntax and Their Intonation in British English.” Lingua 34 (1): 1–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allerton, D. J., and Allan Cruttenden. 1976. “The Intonation of Medial and Final Sentence Adverbials in British English.” Archivum Linguisticum 7 293–259.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Allott, Nicholas, and Mark Textor. 2012. “Lexical Pragmatic Adjustment and the Nature of Ad Hoc Concepts.” International Review of Pragmatics 4 (3): 185–208. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Altenberg, Bengt. 1987. “Predicting Text Segmentation into Tone Units.” In Corpus Linguistics and Beyond, ed. by Willem Meijs, 49–60. Amsterdam: Rodopi. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1990. “Automatic Text Segmentation into Tone Units.” In The London Lund Corpus of Spoken English: Description and Research, ed. by Jan Svartvik, 287–323. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Amaral, Patricia, Craige Roberts, and E. Allyn Smith. 2007. “Review of ‘The Logic of Conventional Implicature’ by Chris Potts.” Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (6): 707–749. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Anderson, Lloyd B. 1986. “Evidentials, Paths of Change and Mental Maps: Typologically Regular Asymmetries.” In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, ed. by Wallace L. Chafe, and Johanna Nichols, 273–312. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ariel, Mira. 2010. Defining Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Astruc-Aguilera, Lluïsa, and Francis Nolan. 2007. “Variation in the Intonation of Sentential Adverbs in English and Catalan.” In Tones and Tunes, Vol. 1: Typological Studies in Word and Sentence Prosody, ed. by Tomas Riad, and Carlos Gussenhoven, 233–262. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bach, Kent, and Robert N. Harnish. 1979. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Beaver, David I., Craige Roberts, Mandy Simons, and Judith Tonhauser. 2017. “Questions Under Discussion: Where Information Structure Meets Projective Content.” Annual Review of Linguistics 3 (1): 265–284. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile. 1958/1971. “Subjectivity in Language.” In Problems in General Linguistics, translated by Mary E. Meek, (pp. 223–230). Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Biskup, Petr. 2011. Adverbials and the Phase Model. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blakemore, Diane. 1987. Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1988. “‘So’ as a Constraint on Relevance.” In Mental Representations, ed. by Ruth Kempson, 183–195. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991. “Performatives and Parentheticals.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 91: 197–213. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. Understanding Utterances. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. “The Relevance of Reformulations.” Language and Literature 2 (2): 101–120. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. “Indicators and Procedures: Nevertheless and But.” Journal of Linguistics 36 (03): 463–486. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Divisions of Labour: The Analysis of Parentheticals.” Lingua 116 (10): 1670–1687. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007a. “Constraints, Concepts and Procedural Encoding.” In Pragmatics, ed. by Noel Burton-Roberts, 45–66. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007b. “‘Or’-Parentheticals, ‘That Is’-Parentheticals and the Pragmatics of Reformulation.” Journal of Linguistics 43 (2): 311–339. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Communication and the Representation of Thought: The Use of Audience-Directed Expressions in Free Indirect Thought Representations.” Journal of Linguistics 46 (3): 575–599. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Blass, Regina. 1990. Relevance Relations in Discourse: A Study with Special Reference to Sissala. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. “Particles, Propositional Attitude and Mutual Manifestness.” In Pragmatic Markers and Propositional Attitude, ed. by Gisle Andersen, and Torsten Fretheim, 39–52. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bogal-Allbritten, Elizabeth. 2013. “Modification of DPs by Epistemic Modal Adverbs.” In Proceedings of the 19th Amsterdam Colloquium, ed. by Maria Aloni, Michael Franke, and Floris Roelofsen, 51–58. Amsterdam: ILLC, University of Amsterdam. [URL]
Bogal-Allbritten, Elizabeth, and Andrew Weir. 2017. “Sentential and Possibly Subsentential Modification: The Ambiguity of Collins Conjunctions.” In NELS 47: Proceedings of the Forty-Seventh Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society. Vol. 1, ed. by Andrew Lamont, and Katerina Tetzloff, 89–102. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1989. Intonation and Its Uses: Melody in Grammar and Discourse. London/ Melbourne: Edward Arnold. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonami, Olivier, and Danièle Godard. 2007. “Parentheticals in Underspecified Semantics: The Case of Evaluative Adverbs.” Research on Language and Computation 5 (4): 391–413. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “Lexical Semantics and Pragmatics of Evaluative Adverbs.” In Adverbs and Adjectives: Syntax, Semantics, and Discourse, ed. by Louise McNally, and Christopher Kennedy, 274–304. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Bonami, Olivier, Danièle Godard, and Brigitte Kampers-Manhe. 2004. “Adverb Classification.” In Handbook of French Semantics, ed. by Francis Corblin, and Henriëtte de Swart, 143–184. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Breheny, Richard. 2019. “Language Processing, Relevance and Questions.” In Relevance: Pragmatics and Interpretation, ed. by Kate Scott, Robyn Carston, and Billy Clark, 42–52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burton-Roberts, Noel. 1999. “Language, Linear Precedence and Parentheticals.” In The Clause in English: In Honour of Rodney Huddleston, ed. by Peter Collins, and David Lee, 33–52. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn. 1993. “Conjunction, Explanation and Relevance.” Lingua 90 (1–2): 27–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. “Quantity Maxims and Generalised Implicature.” Lingua 96 (4): 213–244. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1998. “The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction: A View from Relevance Theory.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 1–30.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. “Explicature and Semantics.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 12: 1–46.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Malden: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. “Relevance Theory and the Saying/Implicating Distinction.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Laurence R. Horn, and Gregory Ward, 633–656. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “Linguistic Communication and the Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction.” Synthese 165: 321–345. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Relevance Theory: Contextualism or Pragmaticism.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 21: 19–26.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010a. “Explicit Communication and ‘Free’ Pragmatic Enrichment.” In Explicit Communication. Essays on Robyn Carston’s Pragmatics, ed. by Belén Soria, and Esther Romero, 217–287. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010b. “Lexical Pragmatics, Ad Hoc Concepts and Metaphor: A Relevance Theory Perspective.” Italian Journal of Linguistics 22 (1): 153–180.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Truth-Conditional Semantics.” In Philosophical Perspectives for Pragmatics (Handbook of Pragmatic Highlights), ed. by Marina Sbisà, Jan-Ola Östman, and Jef Verschueren, 280–288. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Word Meaning and Concept Expressed.” The Linguistic Review 29 (4): 607–623. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Word Meaning, What Is Said, and Explicature.” In What Is Said and What Is Not: The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface, ed. by Carlo Penco, and Filippo Domaneschi, 175–204. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016a. “Contextual Adjustment of Meaning.” In The Routledge Handbook of Semantics, ed. by Nick Riemer, 195–210. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016b. “The Heterogeneity of Procedural Meaning.” Lingua 175–176: 154–166. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. "Ad Hoc Concepts, Polysemy and the Lexicon." In Pragmatics, Relevance and Interpretation, ed. by Kate Scott, Billy Clark, and Robyn Carston, 150--162. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carston, Robyn, and Alison Hall. 2012. “Implicature and Explicature.” In Cognitive Pragmatics, ed. by Hans-Jörg Schmidt, 47–84. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Carter, Ronald A., and Michael M. McCarthy. 2006. Cambridge Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cerrudo, Alba. 2016. “Cyclic Transfer in the Derivation of Complete Parenthetical Clauses.” Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics 5 (1): 59–85. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. “Discourse Phenomena as a Window to the Interfaces.” Catalan Journal of Linguistics, Special Issue: 203–227. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chafloque, Héctor Velásquez. 2014. A Reduplicative Analysis of Sentence Modal Adverbs in Spanish. University of Southern California, PhD dissertation.
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. “Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework.” In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, ed. by Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, 89–156. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. “Derivation by Phase.” In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, ed. by Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. “Beyond Explanatory Adequacy.” In Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. III, ed. by Adriana Belletti, 104–131. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, Ángel J. Gallego, and Dennis Ott. 2019. “Generative Grammar and the Faculty of Language: Insights, Questions, and Challenges.” Catalan Journal of Linguistics, Special Issue: 229–261. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. “Issues in Adverbial Syntax.” Lingua 114: 683–710. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. The Syntax of Adjectives. A Comparative Study. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clark, Billy. 1991. Relevance Theory and the Semantics of Non-Declarative Sentences. University College London, PhD dissertation.
. 1993a. “Let and Let’s: Procedural Encoding and Explicature.” Lingua 90 (1-2) 1993: 173–200. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993b. “Relevance and ‘Pseudo-Imperatives.’” Linguistics and Philosophy 16 (1): 79–121. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. Relevance Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Clifton Jr, Charles, and Lyn Frazier. 2012. “Discourse Integration Guided by the ‘Question under Discussion.’” Cognitive Psychology 65 (2): 352–379. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
d’Avis, Franz J. 2004. “In front of the Prefield – inside or outside the Clause?” In The Syntax and Semantics of the Left Periphery, ed. by Horst Lohnstein, and Susanne Trissler, 139–178. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Davies, Mark. 2008–. The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): One Billion Words, 1990–2019. [URL]
. 2016–. Corpus of News on the Web (NOW): 10 Billion Words from 20 Countries, Updated Every Day. [URL]
. 2018–. The 14 Billion Word iWeb Corpus. [URL]
de Haan, Ferdinand. 2001. “The Relation between Modality and Evidentiality.” Linguistische Berichte 9: 201–216.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
de Vries, Mark. 2002. The Syntax of Relativization. PhD dissertation. Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.
. 2007. “Invisible Constituents? Parentheses as b-Merged Adverbial Phrases.” In Parentheticals, ed. by Nicole Dehé, and Yordanka Kavalova, 203–234. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Specifying Coordination: An Investigation into the Syntax of Dislocation, Extraposition and Parenthesis.” In Language and Linguistics: Emerging Trends, ed. by Cynthia R. Dreyer, 37–98. New York: Nova.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “Asymmetric Merge and Parataxis.” The Canadian Journal of Linguistics 53 (2/3): 355–385. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Unconventional Mergers.” In Ways of Structure Building, ed. by Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria, and Vidal Valmala, 143–166. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dehé, Nicole. 2007. “The Relation between Syntactic and Prosodic Parenthesis.” In Parentheticals, ed. by Nicole Dehé, and Yordanka Kavalova, 261–284. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. Parentheticals in Spoken English: The Syntax–Prosody Relation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Dehé, Nicole, and Yordanka Kavalova (eds). 2007. Parentheticals. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Djärv, Kajsa. 2019. Factive and Assertive Attitude Reports. University of Pennsylvania, PhD dissertation.
Döring, Sandra. 2015. “Parentheticals Are – Presumably – CPs.” In Parenthesis and Ellipsis. Cross-Linguistic and Theoretical Perspectives, ed. by Marlies Kluck, Dennis Ott, and Mark de Vries, 109–145. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph. 1979. "Appositive Relatives Have No Properties." Linguistic Inquiry 10: 211--243.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Elder, Chi-Hé. 2019. Context, Cognition and Conditionals. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Endo, Yoshido, and Liliane Haegeman. 2019. “Adverbial Clauses and Adverbial Concord.” Glossa 4 (1): 1–32. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Engels, Eva. 2004. Adverb Placement. An Optimality Theoretic Approach. University of Potsdam, PhD dissertation.
Ernst, Thomas. 2002. The Syntax of Adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Speaker-Oriented Adverbs.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 27 (3): 497–544. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “The Syntax of Adverbs.” In The Routledge Handbook of Syntax, ed. by Andrew Carnie, Yosuke Sato, and Daniel Siddiqi, 108–130. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Espinal, Teresa. 1991. "The Representation of Disjunct Constituents." Language 67: 726--762. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Falkum, Ingrid Lossius. 2009. “A Pragmatic Solution to the Polysemy Paradox.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 21: 27–54.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. The Semantics and Pragmatics of Polysemy: A Relevance-theoretic Account. University College London, PhD dissertation.
. 2015. “The How and Why of Polysemy: A Pragmatic Account.” Lingua 157: 83–99. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Falkum, Ingrid Lossius, and Agustin Vicente. 2015. “Polysemy: Current Perspectives and Approaches.” Lingua 157: 1–16. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Faller, Martina T. 2006. “Evidentiality below and above Speech Acts.” Unpublished manuscript. [URL]
Fischer, Kerstin. 2006. “Towards an Understanding of the Spectrum of Approaches to Discourse Particles: Introduction to the Volume.” In Approaches to Discourse Particles, ed. by Kerstin Fischer, 1–20. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Forceville, Charles, and Billy Clark. 2014. “Can Pictures Have Explicatures?” Linguagem Em (Dis)Curso 14 (3): 451–472. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frazier, Lyn, Katy Carlson, and Charles Clifton Jr. 2006. “Prosodic Phrasing Is Central to Language Comprehension.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (6): 244–249. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frazier, Lyn, Brian Dillon, and Charles Clifton Jr. 2018. “Together They Stand: Interpreting Not-at-Issue Content.” Language and Speech 61 (2): 199–226. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frey, Werner. 2000. “Über die syntaktische Position der Satztopiks im Deutschen.” ZAS Papers in Linguistics 20: 137–172. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004a. “A Medial Topic Position for German.” Linguistische Berichte 198: 135–190.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004b. “The Grammar-Pragmatics Interface and the German Prefield.” Sprache Und Pragmatik 52: 1–45.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Contrast and Movement to the German Prefield.” In The Architecture of Focus, ed. by Valéria Molnár, and Susanne Winkler, 235–264. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “On Two Types of Adverbial Clauses Allowing Root-Phenomena.” In Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons, ed. by Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman, and Rachel Nye, 405–429. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “On Some Correlations between Interpretative and Formal Properties of Causal Clauses.” In Co- and Subordination in German and Other Languages (Linguistische Berichte, Special Issue 21), ed. by Ingo Reich, and Augustin Speyer, 153–179. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frey, Werner, and Karin Pittner. 1998. “Zur Positionierung Der Adverbiale Im Deutschen Mittelfeld.” Linguistische Berichte 176: 489–543.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Freywald, Ulrike. 2016. “Clause Integration and Verb Position in German. Drawing the Boundary between Subordinating Clause Linkers and Their Paratactic Homonyms.” In Co-and Subordination in German and Other Languages (Linguistische Berichte, Special Issue 21), ed. by Ingo Reich, and Augustin Speyer, 181–220. Hamburg: Nelmut Buske Verlag.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Frisson, Steven. 2009. “Semantic Underspecification in Language Processing.” Linguistics and Language Compass 3 (1): 111–127. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gast, Volker, and Ekkehard König. 2008. “Sentence Anaphora in English and German”. Paper presented at the first meeting of the International Society for the Linguistics of English. Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany: University of Freiburg. [URL]
Geurts, Bart. 2019a. “Commitments Continued.” Theoretical Linguistics 45 (1–2): 111–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019b. “Communication as Commitment Sharing: Speech Acts, Implicatures, Common Ground.” Theoretical Linguistics 45 (1–2): 1–30. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giannakidou, Anastasia. 2011. “Negative and Positive Polarity Items.” In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning. Vol. 2, ed. by Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger, and Paul Portner, 1660–1712. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gibbons, John. 2013. The Norm of Belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra. 2014. “Prosodic Signals as Syntactic Formatives in the Left Periphery.” In On Peripheries: Exploring Clause Initial and Clause Final Positions, ed. by Anna Cardinaletti, Guglielmo Cinque, and Yoshio Endo, 161–188. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “Epistemic Adverbs, the Prosody-Syntax Interface, and the Theory of Phases.” In Romance Linguistics 2013. Selected Papers from the 43rd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), New York, 17–19 April, 2013, ed. by Christina Tortora, Marcel den Dikken, Ignacio L. Montoya, and Teresa O’Neill, 99–117. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gregoromichelaki, Eleni, and Ruth Kempson. 2019. “Procedural Syntax”. In Relevance, Pragmatics and Interpretation, ed. by Kate Scott, Billy Clark, and Robyn Carston, 187–202. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Griffiths, James. 2014. “Parenthetical Verb Constructions, Fragment Answers, and Constituent Modification.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33 (1): 191–229. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Griffiths, James, and Mark de Vries. 2019. “Parenthesis: Syntactic Integration or Orphanage? A Rejoinder to Ott (2016).” Linguistic Inquiry 50 (3): 609–629. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Griffiths, James, and Güliz Güneş. 2015. “Ki Issues in Turkish. Parenthetical Coordination and Adjunction.” In Parenthesis and Ellipsis. Cross-linguistic and Theoretical Perspectives, ed. by Marlies Kluck, Dennis Ott, and Mark de Vries, 173–217. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane. 2006. “Conditionals, Factives and the Left Periphery.” Lingua 116: 1651–1669. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1991/2009. “Parenthetical Adverbials: The Radical Orphanage Approach.” In Dislocated Elements in Discourse: Syntactic, Semantic and Pragmatic Perspectives, ed. by Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey, and Claudia Maienborn, 331–347. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. Adverbial Clauses, Main Clause Phenomena, and the Composition of the Left Periphery. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 8. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane, Benjamin Shaer, and Werner Frey. 2009. “Postscript: Problems and Solutions for Orphan Analyses.” In Dislocated Elements in Discourse: Syntactic, Semantic and Pragmatic Perspectives, ed. by Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey, and Claudia Maienborn, 348–365. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Haider, Hubert. 2006. “Mittelfeld Phenomena (Scrambling in Germanic).” In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, ed. by Martin Everaert, and Henk van Riemsdijk, 204–274. Oxford: Blackwell. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hall, Alison. 2004. “The Meaning of But: A Procedural Reanalysis.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 199–236.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Subsentential Utterances, Ellipsis, and Pragmatic Enrichment.” Pragmatics and Cognition 17 (2): 222–250. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Ad Hoc Concepts: Atomic or Decompositional?” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 23: 1–10.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2014. “‘Free’ Enrichment and the Nature of Pragmatic Constraints.” International Review of Pragmatics 6 (1): 1–28. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hardie, Andrew. 2012. “CQPweb – Combining Power, Flexibility and Usability in a Corpus Analysis Tool.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 17 (3): 380–409. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hickey, Raymond. 2020. “Sure in Irish English: The Diachrony of a Pragmatic Marker.” In Voices of English: Tapping into Records Past and Present, ed. by Ewa Jonsson, and Tove Larsson, 173–186. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holdcroft, David. 1978. Words and Deeds: Problems in the Theory of Speech Acts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Holmes, Janet. 1984. “Modifying Illocutionary Force.” Journal of Pragmatics 8: 345–365. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R. 1984. “Towards a New Taxonomy for Pragmatic Inference: Q-Based and R-Based Implicature.” In Meaning, Form and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications, ed. by Deborah Schiffrin, 11–42. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
1989. A Natural History of Negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hoye, Leo F. 1997. Adverbs and Modality in English. London/New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Huddleston, Rodney, and Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ifantidou, Elly. 2001. Evidentials and Relevance. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ifantidou-Trouki, Elly. 1993. “Sentential Adverbs and Relevance.” Lingua 90 (1–2): 69–90. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Itani, Reiko. 1995. Semantics and Pragmatics of Hedges in English and Japanese. University College London, PhD dissertation.
Itani-Kaufmann, Reiko. 1990. “Explicature and Explicit Attitude.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 2: 52–64.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Iten, Corinne. 2005. Linguistic Meaning, Truth Conditions and Relevance: The Case of Concessives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jackson, Rebecca C. 2016. The Pragmatics of Repetition, Emphasis, and Intensification. University of Salford, PhD dissertation.
Jary, Mark. 2002. “Mood in Relevance Theory: A Re-Analysis Focusing on the Spanish Subjunctive.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 14: 157–187.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. "Are Explicit Performatives Assertions?" Lingistics and Philosphy 30: 207-234. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. “Indicative Mood, Assertoric Force and Relevance.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 237–246.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2008. “The Relevance of Complement Choice: A Corpus Study of ‘Believe.’” Lingua 118 (1): 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. Assertion. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “Assertion, Relevance and the Declarative Mood.” In Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives, ed. by Victoria Escandell-Vidal, Manuel Leonetti, and Aoife Ahern, 267–289. Bingley: Emerald. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2013. “Two Types of Implicature: Material and Behavioural.” Mind and Language 28 (5): 638–660. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jary, Mark, and Mikhail Kissine. 2014. Imperatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “When Terminology Matters: The Imperative as a Comparative Concept.” Linguistics 54 (1): 119–148. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “Imperatives as (Non-)Modals.” In Mood, Aspect, Modality Revisited, ed. by Joanna Blaszczak, Anastasia Giannakidou, Dorota Klimek-Jankowska, and Krzysztof Migdalski, 255–285. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. “Mood and the Analysis of Imperative Sentences.” In Relevance, Pragmatics and Interpretation, ed. by Kate Scott, Billy Clark, and Robyn Carston, 115–126. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kearns, John T. 2006. “Conditional Assertion, Denial, and Supposition as Illocutionary Acts.” Linguistics and Philosophy 29: 455–485. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kluck, Marlies. 2011. Sentence Amalgamation. University of Groningen, PhD dissertation.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kluck, Marlies, and Mark de Vries. 2015. “On V2, Gaps, and Operators in Comment and Reporting Parentheticals.” In Parenthetical Verbs, ed. by Stefan Schneider, Julie Glikman, and Mathieu Avanzi, 103–132. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kluck, Marlies, Dennis Ott, and Mark de Vries (eds). 2015. Parenthesis and Ellipsis. Cross-Linguistic and Theoretical Perspectives. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 2013. “Response Particles as Propositional Anaphors.” In Proceedings of Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 23, ed. by Todd Snider, 1–18. Washington, DC: LSA. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “Assertions and judgements, epistemics, and evidentials.” Paper presented at the Workshop Speech Acts: Meanings, Uses, Syntactic and Prosodic Realizations Leibniz-ZAS Berlin, May 29–31, 2017. [URL]
Leonetti, Manuel, and Victoria M. Escandell Vidal 2009. “Fronting and Verum Focus in Spanish.” In Focus and Background in Romance Languages, ed. by Andreas Dufter, and Daniel Jacob, 155–204. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Liu, Mingya. 2012. Multidimensional Semantics of Evaluative Adverbs. Leiden/Boston: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ludwig, Rainer, Fabienne Salfner, and Mathias Schenner. 2012. “Adverbials in German. More on Embedding and Focus.” Belgian Journal of Linguistics 26 (1): 84–115. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matsui, Tomoko. 2002. “Semantics and Pragmatics of a Japanese Discourse Marker Dakara (So/In Other Words): A Unitary Account.” Journal of Pragmatics 34 (7): 867–891. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Matsui, Tomoko, Taeko Yamamoto, Yui Miura, and Peter McCagg. 2016. “Young Children’s Early Sensitivity to Linguistic Indications of Speaker Certainty in Their Selective Word Learning.” Lingua 175–176: 83–96. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mayol, Laia, and Elena Castroviejo. 2013. “(Non)Integrated Evaluative Adverbs in Questions: A Cross-Romance Study.” Language 89 (2): 195–230. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McCawley, James D. 1982. “Parentheticals and Discontinuous Constituent Structure.” Linguistic Inquiry 13 (1): 91–106.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Meinunger, André. 2004. “On Certain Adverbials in the German ‘Vorfeld’ and ‘Vor-Vor-Feld.’” Sprache und Pragmatik 52: 64–78.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Interface Restrictions on Verb Second.” Linguistic Review 23: 127–160. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Leftmost Peripheral Adverbs and Adjectives in German.” Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 12 (2): 115–135. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mittwoch, Anita. 1977. “How to Refer to One’s Own Words: Speech-Act Modifying Adverbials and the Performative Analysis.” Journal of Linguistics 13 (2): 177–189. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1979. “Final Parentheticals with English Questions: Their Illocutionary Function and Grammar.” Journal of Pragmatics 3 (5): 401–412. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1985. “Sentences, Utterance Boundaries, Personal Deixis and the E-Hypothesis.” Theoretical Linguistics 12 (2–3): 137–152. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Murray, Sarah E. 2017. The Semantics of Evidentials. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Müller, Kalle. 2019. “Sentence Adverbials, (Non-)at-Issueness, and Orientation in German – Evidence from Conditionals.” In Secondary Content. The Semantics and Pragmatics of Side Issues, ed. by Daniel Gutzmann, and Katharina Turgay, 311–340. Leiden: Brill. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ott, Dennis. 2014. “Connectivity in Left-Dislocation and the Composition of the Left Periphery.” Linguistic Inquiry 45: 269–303. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016a. “Ellipsis in Appositives.” Glossa 1 (1): 1–46. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016b. “Fragment Anchors Do Not Support the Syntactic Integration of Appositive Relative Clauses: Reply to Griffiths and de Vries 2013.” Linguistic Inquiry 47: 580–590. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ott, Dennis, and Mark de Vries. 2016. “Right-Dislocation as Deletion.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 34: 641–690. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Ott, Dennis, and Edgar Onea. 2015. “On the Form and Meaning of Appositives.” In Proceedings of NELS 45, Vol. 2, ed. by Thuy Bui, and Deniz Ozyildiz, 203–212. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Padilla Cruz, Manuel. 2009. “Towards an Alternative Relevance-Theoretic Approach to Interjections.” International Review of Pragmatics 1 (1): 182–206. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2010. “What Do Interjections Contribute to Communication and How Are They Interpreted? A Cognitive Pragmatic Approach.” In Pragmatic Perspectives on Language and Linguistics. Vol. I: Speech Actions in Theory and Applied Studies, ed. by Iwona Witczak-Plisiecka, 39–68. New Castle-Upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “On the Origin and Meaning of Secondary Interjections: A Relevance-Theoretic Proposal.” In Applications of Relevance Theory: From Discourse to Morphemes, ed. by Agnieszka Piskorska, and Ewa Wałaszewska, 299–326. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. “Expressive APs and Expletive NPs Revisited: Refining the Extant Relevance-Theoretic Procedural Account.” Lingua 205: 54–70. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R. 2001. Mood and Modality. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pandarova, Irina. 2020. “The Semantics and Pragmatics of Sure in Irish English.” Paper presented at New Perspectives on Irish English 6. Vienna, Austria: University of Vienna. [URL]. [URL]
Papafragou, Anna. 2000. Modality: Issues in the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “Epistemic Modality and Truth Conditions.” Lingua 116 (10): 1688–1702. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Piñón, Christopher. 2006. “Modal Adverbs Again.” Paper presented at the Syntax, Lexicon and Event Structure Conference, July 6, 2006, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem. [URL]
. 2009. “The Thing about Modal Adverbs.” Snippets 20: 42–45.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pittner, Karin. 1999. Adverbiale im Deutschen. Untersuchungen zu ihrer Stellung und Interpretation. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. “Where Syntax and Semantics Meet. Adverbial Positions in the German Middle Field.” In Adverbials: The Interplay between Meaning, Context, and Syntactic Structure, ed. by Jennifer R. Austin, Stefan Engelbrecht, and Gisa Rauh, 253–287. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher. 2005. The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London, New York: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Recanati, Francois. 1987. Meaning and Force: The Pragmatics of Performative Utterances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reis, Marga, and Angelika Wöllstein. 2010. “Zur Grammatik (vor allem) konditionaler V1-Gefüge im Deutschen.” Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 29: 111–179. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. “The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery.” In Elements of Grammar, ed. by Liliane Haegeman, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Roberts, Craige. 2011. “Solving for Interpretation.” Paper presented at the Workshop on Meaning and Understanding at the Centre for Advanced Study, Oslo. [URL]
. 1996/2012. “Information Structure in Discourse: Towards an Integrated Formal Theory of Pragmatics.” Semantics and Pragmatics 5 (6): 1–69. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2017. “Agreeing and Assessing: Epistemic Modals and the Question Under Discussion.” Paper Presented at the Oslo Workshop on Non-at-Issue Meaning and Information Structure“, June 30 2017. [URL]
Rooryck, Johan. 2001. “Evidentiality, Part I.” Glot International 5 (4): 125–133.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Rouchota, Villy. 1994. The Semantics and Pragmatics of the Subjunctive in Modern Greek. A Relevance-Theoretic Approach. University of London, PhD dissertation.
. 1998. “Connectives, Coherence and Relevance.” In Current Issues in Relevance Theory, ed. by Villy Rouchota, and Andreas H. Jucker, 11–57. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Safir, Ken. 1986. “Relative Clauses in a Theory of Binding and Levels.” Linguistic Inquiry 17: 663–689.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sailor, Craig. 2012. “You Can’t Regret So (Even if You Think So).” Paper presented at the Illinois Language and Linguistics Society 4. Illinois: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Sasamoto, Ryoko. 2008. “Japanese Discourse Connectives Dakara and Sorede: A Re-Assessment of Procedural Meaning.” Journal of Pragmatics 40 (1): 127–154. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scheffler, Tatjana. 2013. Two-Dimensional Semantics. Clausal Adjuncts and Complements. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scott, Kate. 2008. “Reference, Procedures and Implicitly Communicated Meaning.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 20: 275–301.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1979. Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Searle, John R., and Daniel Vanderveken. 1985. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shaer, Benjamin, and Werner Frey. 2004. “‘Integrated’ and ‘non-integrated’ left-peripheral elements in German and English.” ZAS Papers in Linguistics 35 (2): 465–502. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Shu, Chih-Hsiang. 2011. Sentence Adverbs in the Kingdom of Agree. Stony Brook University, PhD dissertation.
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie, and Karin Aijmer. 2007. The Semantic Field of Modal Certainty: A Corpus-Based Study of English Adverbs. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simons, Mandy. 2007. “Observations on Embedding Verbs, Evidentiality, and Presupposition.” Lingua 117 (6): 1034–1056. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simons, Mandy, David I. Beaver, Craige Roberts, and Judith Tonhauser. 2017. “The Best Question: Explaining the Projection Behavior of Factives.” Discourse Processes 54 (3): 187–206. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simons, Mandy, Judith Tonhauser, David I. Beaver, and Craige Roberts. 2010. “What Projects and Why.” In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 21, ed. by Nan Li, and David Lutz, 309–327. Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Speas, Peggy, and Carol Tenny. 2003. “Configurational Properties of Point of View Roles.” In Asymmetry in Grammar, ed. by Anna M. Di Scuillo, 315–344. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan. 1997. “Intuitive and Reflective Beliefs.” Mind and Language 12 (1): 67–83. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000. "Metarepresentations in an Evolutionary Perspective." In Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective, ed. by Dan Sperber, 117--137. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, Fabrice Clément, Christophe Heintz, Olivier Mascaro, Hugo Mercier, Gloria Origgi, and Deirdre Wilson. 2010. “Epistemic Vigilance.” Mind and Language 25 (4): 359–393. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1986/1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. 2nd ed. Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2015. “Beyond Speaker’s Meaning.” Croatian Journal of Philosophy 15 (2): 117–149.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Squartini, Mario. 2018. “Extragrammatical Expression of Information Source.” In The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality, ed. by Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald, 273–285. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert C. 1974/1999. Pragmatic Presuppositions. In Content and Context, 47–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2002. “Common Ground.” Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 701–721. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stenström, Anna-Brita. 1990. “Adverbial Commas and Prosodic Segmentation.” In The London Lund Corpus of Spoken English: Description and Research, ed. by Jan Svartvik, 253–266. Lund: Lund University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stowell, Tim. 2017. “Qualified Parenthetical Adjuncts.” Wiener Linguistische Gazette 82: 289–295.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
te Velde, John R. 2010. “Towards an Account of Adverbials in the Vor-Vorfeld: Beyond V2-Syntax.” Tampa Papers in Linguistics 4 (1): 62–86.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tescari Neto, Aquiles. 2013. On Verb Movement in Brazilian Portuguese: A Cartographic Study. Università Ca’ Foscari di Venezia, PhD dissertation.
Tonhauser, Judith. 2012. “Diagnosing (not-)at-issue content.” In Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on the Semantics of Under-represented Languages in the Americas (SULA6) and SULA-Bar, ed. by Elizabeth Bogal-Allbritten, 239–254. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tonhauser, Judith, David I. Beaver, and Judith Degen. 2018. “How Projective Is Projective Content? Gradience in Projectivity and At-Issueness.” Journal of Semantics 35 (3): 1–48. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tonhauser, Judith, David I. Beaver, Craige Roberts, and Mandy Simons. 2013. “Toward a Taxonomy of Projective Content.” Language 89 (1): 66–109. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 2015. “Intonation Phrases and Speech Acts.” In Parenthesis and Ellipsis. Cross-Linguistic and Theoretical Perspectives, ed. by Marlies Kluck, Dennis Ott, and Mark de Vries, 301–349. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan. 1999. “Multiple Spell-Out.” In Working Minimalism, ed. by Samuel D. Epstein, and Norbert Hornstein, 251–282. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Urmson, James O. 1952/1963. “Parenthetical Verbs.” In Philosophy and Ordinary Language, ed. by Charles E. Caton, 220–240. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Urquiza Arribas, Catalina. 2014. Constructing Concepts and Word Meanings: The Role of Context and Memory Traces. University College London, PhD dissertation.
van Gompel, Roger P. G. 2006. “Sentence Processing.” In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. ed. by Keith Brown, 251–255. Oxford: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Gompel, Roger P. G., Martin J. Pickering, and Matthew J. Traxler. 2000. “Unrestricted Race: A New Model of Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution.” In Reading as a Perceptual Process, ed. by Alan Kennedy, Ralph Radach, Dieter Heller, and Joël B. T. Pynte, 621–648. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vanderveken, Daniel. 1990. Meaning and Speech acts, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vicente, Begona, and Marjolein Groefsema. 2013. “Something out of Nothing? Rethinking Unarticulated Constituents.” Journal of Pragmatics 47 (1): 108–127. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
von Fintel, Kai. 2003. “Epistemic Modals and Conditionals Revisited.” Handout, Colloquium at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA. [URL]
von Fintel, Kai, and Anthony S. Gillies. 2011. “‘Might’ Made Right.” In Epistemic Modality, ed. by Andy Egan, and Brian Weatherson, 108–130. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wharton, Tim. 2009. Pragmatics and Non-Verbal Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “That Bloody So-and-So Has Retired: Expressives Revisited.” Lingua 175–176: 20–35. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wichmann, Anne. 2000. Intonation in Text and Discourse: Beginnings, Middles and Ends. London: Longman.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2001. “Spoken Parentheticals.” In A Wealth of English, ed. by Karin Aijmer, 177–193. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre. 2004. “Relevance and Lexical Pragmatics.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 343–360.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2006. “The Pragmatics of Verbal Irony: Echo or Pretence?” Lingua 116 (10): 1722–1743. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Irony and Metarepresentation.” UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 21: 183–226.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011. “The Conceptual-Procedural Distinction: Past, Present and Future.” In Procedural Meaning: Problems and Perspectives, ed. by Victoria Escandell-Vidal, Manuel Leonetti, and Aoife Ahern, 3–31. Bingley: Emerald. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2000/2012. “Metarepresentation in Linguistic Communication.” In Meaning and Relevance, ed. by Deirdre Wilson, and Dan Sperber, 230–258. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “Reassessing the Conceptual–Procedural Distinction.” Lingua 175–176: 5–19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Robyn Carston. 2006. “Metaphor, Relevance and the ‘Emergent Property’ Issue.” Mind and Language 21 (3): 404–433. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. “A Unitary Approach to Lexical Pragmatics: Relevance, Inference and Ad Hoc Concepts.” In Pragmatics, ed. by Noel Burton-Roberts, 230–259. London: Palgrave MacMillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Dan Sperber. 1979. “Ordered Entailments: An Alternative to Presuppositional Theories.” In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 11: Presuppositions, ed. by Choon-Kuy Oh, and David A. Dinneen, 299–323. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1988/2012. “Mood and the Analysis of Non-Declarative Sentences.” In Meaning and Relevance, ed. by Deirdre Wilson, and Dan Sperber, 210–229. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1992. “On Verbal Irony.” Lingua 87: 53–76. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1993. “Linguistic Form and Relevance.” Lingua 90: 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2002. “Truthfulness and Relevance.” Mind 111 (443): 583–632. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2004. “Relevance Theory.” In The Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Laurence R. Horn, and Gregory Ward, 607–632. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Deirdre, and Tim Wharton. 2006. “Relevance and Prosody.” Journal of Pragmatics 38 (10): 1559–1579. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wolf, Lavi. 2014. Degrees of Assertion. Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, PhD dissertation.
Wolf, Lavi, and Ariel Cohen. 2011. “Clarity as Objectivized Belief.” In Vagueness and Language Use, ed. by Paul Égré, and Nathan Klinedinst, 165–190. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Malte. 2008. “Discourse Particles in the Left Periphery.” In Dislocated Elements in Discourse: Syntactic, Semantic and Pragmatic Perspectives, ed. by Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey, and Claudia Maienborn, 200–231. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter. 2005. “Verb Second as a Function of Merge.” In The Function of Function Words and Functional Categories, ed. by Marcel den Dikken, and Christina M. Tortora, 11–40. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue