References (35)
References
Behn-Taran, Angelika. 2014. “I am my own worst enemy.” A linguistic analysis of interactive dynamics of relational patterns in business coaching conversations. [URL].Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Brinker, Karl, and Sven Frederik Sager. 2010. Linguistische Gesprächsanalyse. Eine Einführung. Berlin: Schmidt.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Burt, Daniel, and Zenobia Talati. 2017. “The unsolved value of executive coaching: A meta-analyses of outcome using randomized control trial studies.” International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring 15 (2): 17–24.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Haan, Erik, and Judie Gannon. 2016. “The Coaching Relationship.” In The SAGE Handbook of Coaching, ed. by. Tatiana Bachkirova, Gordon Spence, and David Drake, 195–216. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, doi.org/10.4135/9781473983861.n11Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
De Meuse, Kenneth P., Dai, Guangrong, and Robert J. Lee. 2009. “Evaluating the effectiveness of executive coaching: beyond ROI?Coaching, 2(2): 117–134.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deplazes, Silvia, Eva-Maria Graf, and Hansjörg Künzli. 2018. “Das TSPP-Modell – Eine Blaupause für die Coaching-Prozessforschung.” Coaching | Theorie & Praxis 4: 69–82. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Deppermann, Arnulf. 2008. Gespräche analysieren. Eine Einführung (4. Aufl.). Wiesbaden: VS. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graf, Eva-Maria. 2015. “Kommunikative Basisaktivitäten im Coaching-Gespräch: Ein linguistischer Beitrag zur Coaching-Prozessforschung.” Coaching | Theorie & Praxis 1: 5–14. . Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2018. “Äußerung für Äußerung zum Coaching-Prozess: Das Potential einer gesprächsanalytisch fundierten Coaching-Prozessforschung.“ In Coaching-Prozessforschung. Forschung und Praxis im Dialog, ed. by Robert Wegener, Michael Loebbert, Agnes Fritze, and Marianne Hänseler, 141–161. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graf, Eva-Maria, and Thomas Spranz-Fogasy. 2018. “Welche Frage, wann und warum? – Eine qualitativ-linguistische Programmatik zur Erforschung von Frage-Sequenzen als zentrale Veränderungspraktik im Coaching.” Coaching | Theorie & Praxis 4: 17–32. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Graf, Eva-Maria. 2019. The Pragmatics of Executive Coaching. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Henne, Helmut, and Helmut Rehbock. 2001. Einführung in die Gesprächsanalyse. Berlin: De Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Jones, Rebecca J., Stephen A. Woods, and Yves R. F. Guillaume. 2015. “The effectiveness of workplace coaching: a meta analysis of learning and performance outcomes from coaching.” Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 89: 249–277. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kramer, Ueli, and Williams Stiles 2015. “The Responsiveness Problem in Psychotherapy: A Review of Proposed Solutions.” Clincal Psychology Science and Practice 22(3): 277–295. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mannhardt, Sonja, and Erik De Haan. 2018. ”Coaching-Beziehung”. In Handbuch Schlüsselkonzepte im Coaching, ed. by. Siegfried Greif, Heidi Möller, and Wolfgang Scholl, 85–94. Berlin: Springer. . Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Migge, B. 2018. Handbuch Coaching und Beratung. Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Mroczynski, Robert. 2014. Gesprächslinguistik. Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Nothdurft, Werner, Ulrich Reitmeier, and Peter Schröder. 1994. Beratungsgespräche. Analyse asymmetrischer Dialoge. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Oxford Dictionaries. 2022. “Responsiveness.” [URL]Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi, Charles Antaki, Sanna Vehviläinen, and Ivan Leudar (eds). 2008. Conversation Analysis of Psychotherapy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Peräkylä, Anssi. 2013. “Conversation Analysis in Psychotherapy.” In The Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. by. Jack Sidnell, and Tanya Stivers, 551–574. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2019. “Conversation Analysis and Psychotherapy: Identifying transformative sequences.” Research on Language and Social Interaction 52:3: 257–280, .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pick, Ina (ed.). 2017. Beraten in Interaktion. Eine gesprächslinguistische Typologie des Beratens. Frankfurt am M.: Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sarangi, Srikant. 2002. “The Language of Likelihood in Genetic Counselling Discourse.” Journal for Language and Social Psychology 21(1): 7–31. .Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Scarvaglieri, Claudio. 2013. “Nichts anderes als ein Austausch von Worten. Sprachliches Handeln in der Psychotherapie.” Berlin/Bosten: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction. A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Schwitalla, Johannes (1979). "Nonresponsive Antworten." Deutsche Sprache, Zeitschrift für Theorie, Praxis, Dokumentation. 7. Jahrgang. 193-211.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Selting, Margret et al.. 2009. “Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT 2).” Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion 10: 353–402.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sonesh, Shirley C., Chris W. Coultas, Christina N. Lacerenza, Shannon L. Marlow, Lauren E. Benishek, and Eduardo Salas. 2015. “The power of coaching: a meta-analytic investigation.” Coaching 8(2): 73–95. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Stivers, Tanja. 2015. "Coding Social Interaction: A Heretical Approach in Conversation Analysis?" Research on Language and Social Interaction 48:1: 1-19. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Theeboom, Tim, Bianca Beersma, and Annelies van Vianen. 2014. “Does coaching work? A meta-analysis on the effects of coaching on individual level outcomes in an organizational context.” The Journal of Positive Psychology 9(1): 1–18. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Vehviläinen, Sanna. 1999. Structures of Counselling Interaction. A Conversation Analytic Study of Counselling Encounters in Career Guidance Training. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Voutilainen Liisa, Anssi Peräkylä, and Johanna Ruusuvuori. 2010. “Recognition and Interpretation: Responding to Emotional Experience in Psychotherapy.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 43(1): 85–107. 10.1080/08351810903474799. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Voutilainen, Liisa, and Anssi Peräkylä. 2016. “Interactional Practices of Psychotherapy.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Adult Mental Health, ed. by. Michelle O’Reilly, and Jessica Lester, 540–557. Houndmills: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Winkler, Oliver. 2017. “Anwendung der Gesprächsanalyse als Feedback-Instrument im Chat-Coaching.” Coaching | Theorie & Praxis: 17–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (4)

Cited by four other publications

Mikkola, Piia, Riikka Nissi & Esa Lehtinen
2025. Emergent professional practices. Language and Dialogue 15:3  pp. 438 ff. DOI logo
Fleischhacker, Melanie & Eva-Maria Graf
2024. A closer look into the ‘black box’ of coaching – linguistic research into the local effectiveness of coaching with the help of conversation analysis. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice 17:1  pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Fleischhacker, Melanie & Eva-Maria Graf
2024. New ways of investigating coaching: linguistic research on executive, business and workplace coaching – a systematic scoping review. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice 17:1  pp. 90 ff. DOI logo
Kabatnik, Susanne
2024. “Because he was disgusting”: transforming relations through positioning in messenger-supported group psychotherapy. Frontiers in Psychology 14 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue