Cover not available

In:Corpus Pragmatic Studies on the History of Medical Discourse
Edited by Turo Hiltunen and Irma Taavitsainen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 330] 2022
► pp. 179–202

Get fulltext from our e-platform
JBE logo with link
PDF logo with download linkDownload Book PDF
EPUB logo with download linkDownload Book EPUB
authorization required

Chapter 8
Language, labour and ideology

Constructing epistemologies of childbirth in the first three centuries of English-language midwifery texts (1540–1800)

 | University of Nottingham
Published online: 1 July 2022
DOI logo with link
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.330.08whi
Abstract
Writings on midwifery and women’s medicine related to childbirth reflect the many changes affecting this field during the Early Modern period, which in turn reflect changes in epistemological values Through the lens of critical discourse analysis, this paper discusses existing and emergent ideological demarcations between the wide range of midwifery texts published between 1500 and 1800 through a qualitative examination of prefatory material in these texts. It is shown that the earliest midwifery texts make much recourse to the authoritative knowledge of classical authors, following the tradition of medieval Scholasticism. As female midwives enter the textual scene, personal experience and empathy become valued sources of knowledge. Finally, the emergence of 'man-midwives' led to scientific prowess combined with personal experience touted as the most superior form of knowledge relating to the care of parturient women.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.A brief history of midwifery and (textual) practice, 1540–1800
  • 3.Methodology
    • 3.1Knowledge, ideology and Critical Discourse Analysis
    • 3.2Creating a corpus of early midwifery texts (1540–1800)
  • 4.An overview of language and ideology in the prefatory material
    • 4.1The value and audience of knowledge dissemination
    • 4.2Authors as the curators of knowledge
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
References (57)
References
Arons, Wendy. 1994. “Translator’s Introduction.” In When Midwifery Became the Male Physician’s Province: The Sixteenth Century Handbook The Rose Garden for Pregnant Women and Midwives, Newly Englished, by Eucharius Rosslin, trans. by Wendy Arons, 1–25. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Böhme, Gernot. 2017. “Midwifery as Science: An Essay on the Relation between Scientific and Everyday Knowledge.” In Society and Knowledge: Contemporary Perspectives in the Sociology of Knowledge and Science, ed. by Nico Stehr, and Volker Meja, 373–392. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cahill, Heather A. 2001. “Male Appropriation and Medicalization of Childbirth: An Historical Analysis.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 33 (3): 334–342. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cody, Lisa Forman. 2005. Birthing the Nation: Sex, Science, and the Conception of Eighteenth-Century Britons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Crawford, Patricia. 2015. Blood, Bodies and Families in Early Modern England. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Dijk, Teun A. 1995. “Discourse, Power and Access.” In Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard, and Malcolm Coulthard, 84–104. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2011. “Discourse, Knowledge, Power and Politics: Towards Critical Epistemic Discourse Analysis.” In Critical Discourse Studies in Context and Cognition, ed. by Christopher Hart, 28–63. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Evenden, Doreen. 2000. The Midwives of Seventeenth-Century London. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 2010. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fissell, Mary E. 2004. Vernacular Bodies: The Politics of Reproduction in Early Modern England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Flügge, Sibylla. 1998. Hebammen und heilkundige Frauen: Recht und Rechtswirklichkeit im 15. und 16. Jahrhundert. Frankfurt a. M./Basel: Stroemfeld.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Fritz, Gerd, Thomas Gloning, and Juliane Glüer (eds). 2018. Historical Pragmatics of Controversies: Case Studies from 1600 to 1800. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Green, Monica H. 2008a. Making Women’s Medicine Masculine: The Rise of Male Authority in Pre-Modern Gynaecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2008b. “Gendering the History of Women’s Healthcare.” Gender & History 20 (3): 487–518. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2009. “The Sources of Eucharius Rösslin’s ‘Rosegarden for Pregnant Women and Midwives’ (1513).” Medical History 53: 167–192. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Gubalke, Wolfgang. 1985. Die Hebamme im Wandel der Zeiten: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des Hebammenwesens. 2nd edition, ed. by Ruth Kölle. Hannover: Elwin Staude.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hanson, Clare. 2004. A Cultural History of Pregnancy: Pregnancy, Medicine and Culture, 1750–2000. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Harley, David. 1993. “Provincial Midwives in England: Lancashire and Cheshire, 1660–1760.” In The Art of Midwifery: Early Modern Midwives in Europe, ed. by Hilary Marland, 27–48. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Hobby, Elaine. 1999. “Introduction.” In The Midwives Book, or the Whole Art of Midwifery Discovered, by Jane Sharp, ed. by Elaine Hobby, xi–xxxi. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2009. “Introduction.” In The Birth of Mandkind: Otherwise Named, The Woman’s Book, by Thomas Raynalde, ed. by Elaine Hobby, xv–xxxix. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Keller, Eve. 2000. “Embryonic Individuals: The Rhetoric of Seventeenth-Century Embryology and the Construction of Early-Modern Identity.” Eighteenth-Century Studies 33 (3): 321–342. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2003. “The Subject of Touch: Medical Authority in Early Modern Midwifery.” In Sensible Flesh: On Touch in Early Modern Culture, ed. by Elizabeth D. Harvey, 62–80. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2007. Generating Bodies and Gendered Selves: The Rhetoric of Reproduction in Early Modern England. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
King, Helen. 1993. “The Politick Midwife: Models of Midwifery in the Work of Elizabeth Cellier.” In The Art of Midwifery: Early Modern Midwives in Europe, ed. by Hilary Marland, 115–130. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 1995. “‘As if none understood the art that cannot understand Greek’: The Education of Midwives in Seventeenth-Century England.” In The History of Medical Education in Britain, ed. by Vivian Nutton, and Roy Porter, 184–198. Amsterdam/Atlanta: Rodopi.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Midwifery, 1700–1800: The Man-Midwife as Competitor.” In Nursing and Midwifery in Britain since 1700, ed. by Anne Borsay, and Billie Hunter, 107–127. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Kruse, Britta-Juliane. 1994. “Neufund einer handschriftlichen Vorstufe von Eucharius Rößlins Hebammenlehrbuch Der schwangeren Frauen und Hebammen Rosengarten und des Frauenbüchleins Ps.-Ortolfs”. Sudhoffs Archiv 78: 220–236.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
van Leeuwen, Theo. 1995. “The Representation of Social Actors.” In Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard, and Malcolm Coulthard, 32–70. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lieske, Pam. 2007–2009. Eighteenth-Century British Midwifery. 12 Vols. London: Pickering & Chatto.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Lingo, Alison Klairmont. 2017. “Editor’s Introduction.” Midwife to the Queen of France: Diverse Observations, by Louise Bourgeois, trans. by Stephanie O’Hara, and ed. by Alison Klairmont Lingo, 1–65. Toronto: Iter Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
McIntosh, Tania. 2012. A Social History of Maternity and Childbirth: Key Themes in Maternity Care. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
O’Hara, Stephanie. 2017. “Translator’s Introduction.” Midwife to the Queen of France: Diverse Observations, by Louise Bourgeois, trans. by Stephanie O’Hara, and ed. by Alison Klairmont Lingo, 67–77. Toronto: Iter Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pahta, Päivi. 2011. “Eighteenth-Century English Medical Texts and Discourses on Reproduction.” In Languages of Science in the Eighteenth Century, ed. by Britt-Louise Gunnarsson, 333–355. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pahta, Päivi, and Irma Taavitsainen. 2010. “Scientific Discourse.” In The Handbook of Historical Pragmatics, ed. by Andreas H. Jucker, and Irma Taavitsainen, 549–586. Berlin/New York: de Gruyter. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Perkins, Wendy. 1996. Midwifery and Medicine in Early Modern France: Louise Bourgeois. Exeter: University of Exeter Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Plappert, Garry. 2019. “Not Hedging but Implying: Identifying Epistemic Implicature through a Corpus-Driven Approach to Scientific Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 139: 163–174. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Pomata, Gianna. 2011a. “Observation Rising: Birth of an Epistemic Genre, 1500–1650.” In Histories of Scientific Observation, ed. by Lorraine Daston, and Elizabeth Lunbeck, 45–80. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2011b. “A Word of the Empirics: The Ancient Concept of Observation and Its Recovery in Early Modern Medicine.” Annals of Science 68 (1): 1–25. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Potter, Jonathan. 1996. Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: Sage. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reinarz, Jonathan, and Rebecca Wynter (eds). 2015. Complaints, Controversies and Grievances in Medicine: Historical and Social Science Perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin. 2017. “The Discourse-Historical Approach.” In The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by John Flowerdew and John E. Richardson, 44–59. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Reisigl, Martin, and Ruth Wodak. 2001. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2016. “The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA).” In Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, ed. by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer, 23–61. 3rd edition. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Richards, Jennifer. 2015. “Reading and Hearing The Womans Booke in Early Modern England.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 89 (3): 434–462. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Simpson, Paul. 1993. Language, Ideology and Point of View. London: Routledge. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Sommers, Sheena. 2011. “Transcending the Sexed Body: Reason, Sympathy, and ‘Thinking Machines’ in the Debates over Early English Midwifery.” In The Female Body in Medicine and Literature, ed. by Andrew Mangham, and Greta Depledge, 89–106. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Staub, Susan C. 2011. “Surveilling the Secrets of the Female Body: The Contest for Reproductive Authority in the Popular Press of the Seventeenth Century.” In The Female Body in Medicine and Literature, ed. by Andrew Mangham, and Greta Depledge, 51–68. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2001. “Evidentiality and Scientific Thought-Styles: English Medical Writing in Late Middle English and Early Modern English.” In Modality in Specialized Texts: Selected Papers of the 1st CERLIS Conference, ed. by Maurizio Gotti, and Marina Dossena, 21–52. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
. 2012. “Audience Guidance and Learned Medical Writing in Late Medieval English.” In Advances in Medical Discourse Analysis, ed. by Maurizio Gotti, Marina Dossena, and Françoise Salager-Meyer, 431–456. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Taavitsainen, Irma, Päivi Pahta, Turo Hiltunen, Martti Mäkinen, Ville Marttila, Maura Ratia, Carla Suhr, and Jukka Tyrkkö. 2010. Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus. In Early Modern English Medical Texts: Corpus Description and Studies, ed. by Irma Taavitsainen, and Päivi Pahta. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Tatlock, Lynne. 2005. “Volume Editor’s Introduction.” In The Court Midwife, by Justine Siegemund, trans. and ed. by Lynne Tatlock, 1–30. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Thompson, John B. 1984. Studies in the Theory of Ideology. Cambridge: Polity Press. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Walsh, Katharine Phelps. 2014. “Marketing Midwives in Seventeenth-Century London: A Re-Examination of Jane Sharp’s The Midwives Book.” Gender & History 26 (2): 223–241. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Whitt, Richard J. 2016a. “Evidentiality in Early Modern English Medical Treatises (1500–1700).” Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 2 (2): 235–263. Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
2016b. “Using Corpora to Track Changing Thought Styles: Evidentiality, Epistemology, and Early Modern Scientific Discourse in English and German.” Kalbotyra 69: 265–291.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Wilson, Adrian. 1995. The Making of Man-Midwifery: Childbirth in England, 1660–1770. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar logo with link to Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Whitt, Richard J.
2023. Satire in Eighteenth-Century Medical Discourse: Elizabeth Nihell, Tobias Smollett and the Advent of Man-Midwifery. English Studies 104:8 ► pp. 1363 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

Mobile Menu Logo with link to supplementary files background Layer 1 prag Twitter_Logo_Blue