In:Corpus Pragmatic Studies on the History of Medical Discourse
Edited by Turo Hiltunen and Irma Taavitsainen
[Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 330] 2022
► pp. 23–48
Chapter 2“A geography of names”
A genre analysis of nationality-driven names for venereal disease in seventeenth-century England
Published online: 1 July 2022
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.330.02mce
https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.330.02mce
Abstract
We investigate discourses surrounding venereal disease in a wide body of seventeenth-century texts in the one-billion-word Early English Books Online (EEBO) corpus. By combining quantitative methods with close reading of texts within EEBO, we explore whether perceptions of sufferers and responses to the illness itself shifted as the century progressed. In order to uncover the kinds of written works in which references to venereal disease appear, we undertake a genre analysis with the help of genre categories added to the corpus. The analysis shows that at the beginning of the century, references to these diseases were most likely to appear within historical works, while the end of the century witnesses an increase in references to venereal disease in scientific and medical texts.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 1.1Disease and place
- 2.Material and methods
- 2.1Corpus
- 2.2Genre
- 3.Results
- 3.1What words were used to refer to venereal disease?
- 3.2Genre distribution
- 4.Conclusion
Acknowledgements Notes References
References (74)
Primary sources
B.E. 1699. A New Dictionary of the Canting Crew in its Several Tribes of Gypsies, Beggers, Thieves, Cheats &c. London.
Bate, George, James Shipton and William Salmon. 1694. Pharmacopœia Bateana, or, Bate’s dispensatory. London.
Culpeper, Nicholas. 1651. Semeiotica Uranica, or, An Astrological Judgment of Diseases from the Decumbiture of the Sick. London.
Glisson, William, Anthony Gulston, William Style and Henry Applegarth. 1679. The Common Law Epitomiz’d with Directions How to Prosecute and Defend Personal Actions, Very Useful for All Lawyers, Justices of Peace, and Gentlemen. London.
J.T. 1619. The Hunting of the Pox a Pleasant Discourse betweene the Authour, and Pild-Garlicke. London.
Lowe, Peter. 1569. Easie, certaintie, and perfect method, to cure and preuent the Spanish sicknes. London.
Pechey, John. 1692. A Collection of Chronical Diseases viz. the Colick, the Bilious Colick, Hysterick Diseases, the Gout, and the Bloody Urine from the Stone in the Kidnies. London.
. 1694a. The Compleat Herbal of Physical Plants Containing All Such English and Foreign Herbs, Shrubs and Trees as are Used in Physick and Surgery. London.
. 1694b. The London Dispensatory, Reduced to the Practice of the London Physicians wherein are Contain’d the Medicines, Both Galenical and Chymical, that are Now in Use. London.
. 1697. A Plain Introduction to the Art of Physick Containing the Fundamentals, and Necessary Preliminaries to Practice. London.
Secondary sources
Bailey-Goldschmidt, Janice, and Martin Kalfatovic. 1993. “Sex, Lies and European Hegemony: Travel Literature and Ideology.” Journal of Popular Culture 26 (4): 141–153.
Bergs, Alexander. 2004. “Letters: A New Approach to Text Typology.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 5 (2): 207–227.
Burford, Ephraim John. 1973. The Orrible Synne: A Look at London Lechery from Roman to Cromwellian Times. London: Calder and Boyars.
Churchill, Wendy. 2005. “The Medical Practice of the Sexed Body: Women, Men, and Disease in Britain, circa 1600–1740.” Social History of Medicine 18 (1): 3–22.
Eastaugh, Nicholas, Valentine Walsh, Tracey Chaplin and Ruth Siddall. 2008. Pigment Compendium: A Dictionary and Optical Microscopy of Historical Pigments. London and New York: Routledge.
Fraser, Antonia. 1984. The Weaker Vessel: Woman’s Lot in Seventeenth Century England. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Gowing, Laura. 1993. “Gender and the Language of Insult in Early Modern London.” History Workshop Journal 35: 1–21.
Furdell, Elizabeth. 2002. Publishing and Medicine in Early Modern England. New York: University of Rochester Press.
Green, Jonathan. 2020. Green’s Dictionary of Slang. Digital Edition. [URL]
Hamlin, William. 2014. “God-language and Scepticism in Early Modern England: An Exploratory Study Using Corpus Linguistics Analysis as a Form of Distant Reading.” English Literature 1 (1): 17–41.
Hardie, Andrew. 2012. “CQPweb – Combining Power, Flexibility and Usability in a Corpus Analysis Tool.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 17 (3): 380–409.
Kohn, George (ed.) 2008. Encyclopedia of Plague and Pestilence: From Ancient Times to the Present. New York: Facts on File.
Lancashire, Ian. 2015. Lexicons of Early Modern English. Toronto: University of Toronto Library and University of Toronto Press. [URL]
McEnery, Tony, and Helen Baker. 2016. Corpus Linguistics and 17th-Century Prostitution: Computational Linguistics and History. Bloomsbury: London.
. 2017a. “Language Surrounding Poverty in Early Modern England: A Corpus-Based Investigation of How People Living in the Seventeenth-Century Perceived the Criminalised Poor.” In From Data to Evidence in English Language Research, ed. by Carla Suhr, Terttu Nevalainen and Irma Taavitsainen, 225–257. Leiden and Boston: Brill.
. 2017b. “The Public Representation of Homosexual Men in Seventeenth-Century England: A Corpus Based View.” Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics 3 (2): 197–217.
Murphy, Sean. 2019. “Shakespeare and His Contemporaries: Designing a Genre Classification scheme for Early English Books Online 1560–1640.” ICAME Journal 43: 59–82.
Orr, Leah. 2011. “Genre Labels on the Title Pages of English Fiction, 1660–1800.” Philological Quarterly 90 (1): 65–95.
Qualtiere, Louis F. and William W. E. Slights. 2003. “Contagion and Blame in Early Modern England: The Case of the French Pox.” Literature and Medicine 22 (1): 1–24.
Ratia, Maura. 2013. “Investigating Genre through Title-Pages: Plague Treatises of the Stuart Period in Focus.” In Principles and Practices for the Digital Editing and Annotation of Diachronic Data, ed. by Anneli Meurman-Solin and Jukka Tyrkkö. Helsinki: Varieng. [URL]
Sharpe, James A. 1980. Defamation and Sexual Slander in Early Modern England: The Church Courts at York. York: Borthwick.
Siena, Kevin. 1998. “Pollution, Promiscuity, and the Pox: English Venereology and the Early Modern Medical Discourse on Social and Sexual Danger.” Journal of the History of Sexuality 8 (4): 553–574.
. 2001. “The ‘Foul Disease’ and Privacy: The Effects of Venereal Disease and Patient Demand on the Medical Marketplace in Early Modern London.” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 75 (2): 199–224.
Smitterberg, Erik, and Merja Kytö. 2015. “English Genres in Diachronic Corpus Linguistics.” In From Clerks to Corpora: Essays on the English Language Yesterday and Today, ed. by Philip Shaw, Britt Erman, Gunnel Melchers and Peter Sundkvist, 117–133. Stockholm: Stockholm University Press.
Spates, William. 2006. “Proverbs, Pox, and the Early Modern Femme Fatale.” Notes and Queries 53 (1): 47.
Spongberg, Mary. 1997. Feminizing Venereal Disease: The Body of the Prostitute in Nineteenth-Century Medical Discourse. New York: New York University Press.
Sullivan, Ceri. 2007. “Disposable Elements? Indications of Genre in Early Modern Titles.” The Modern Language Review 32 (2): 641–653.
Sumich, Christi. 2013. Divine Doctors and Dreadful Distempers: How Practicing Medicine Became a Respectable Profession. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.
Szreter, Simon. 2017. “Treatment Rates for the Pox in Early Modern England: A Comparative Estimate of the Prevalence of Syphilis in the City of Chester and its Rural Vicinity in the 1770s.” Continuity and Change 32 (2): 183–223.
Taavitsainen, Irma. 2001a. “Changing Conventions of Writing: The Dynamics of Genres, Text Types, and Text Traditions.” European Journal of English Studies 5 (2): 139–150.
. 2001b. “Middle English recipes: Genre characteristics, Text Type Features and Underlying Traditions of Writing.” Journal of Historical Pragmatics 2 (1): 85–113.
Tapié, Victor. 1976. “Louis XIV’s Methods in Foreign Policy.” In Louis XIV and Europe, ed. by Ragnhild Marie Hatton, 3–15. London: Macmillan.
Vazquez, Maegan. 2020. “Trump says he’s pulling back from calling novel coronavirus the ‘China virus’”. CNN. 24 March 2020. [URL]
Vazquez, Maegan, and Betsy Klein. 2020. “Trump again defends use of the term ‘China virus’. CNN, 17 March 2020. [URL]
Cited by (2)
Cited by two other publications
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 november 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.
